Dangling Conversation, Debate Edition: Should JP Go?
Hugo and I thought it might be a good idea to have a debate. There were a couple of reasons for it, one, of course, was it seemed like a fun idea. The other is that we were a little bothered by how often in the comments section people seemed to be taking personal shots at each other instead of debating the issue at hand, so we thought maybe we could show how we would prefer it done. Then, of course, I made a lawyer crack, so much for not making it personal (that's ok, he knows he's a lawyer).
I guess it is worth pointing out that this is a debate, we picked sides of the issue pretty much at random. We don't necessarily agree with the side we are on, just one of us had to be on each side. It is often the same on the site, we'll take the opposite position of a commenter to get conversation going, even if we don't always agree with that position. We may add to it from time to time and feel free to add in your opinions in the comments.
Anyway to the debate:
Tom: Should JP Ricciardi be let go as General Manager of the Toronto Blue Jays?
Tom: Yes he should. JP became GM after the 2001 season selling himself to ownership by promising the team could compete with a lower payroll than they had at the time. He dumped some veteran players, brought down the payroll and we didn't win. So he told management that the team couldn't compete with a low payroll and soon we were paying players $100 million and we still didn't win. We've had 4 different managers not be able to win with JP's players. Soon you gotta look at the guy putting the team together.
First the guy decides we can't afford to pay Carlos Delgado, likely the best bat ever to play for the team, and then he signs Vernon Wells to an even bigger contract than Delgado had. Then he signs AJ Burnett and BJ Ryan to big contracts. Has signing a free agent reliever to a large, long term contract ever worked out? Didn't Billy Beane teach him anything out there in Oakland? I think it's time to try someone else.
Hugo: You know, a couple of years ago, I think I would've agreed with you. Let's take the 2006-2007 off-season. Yes, BJ Ryan had just had an excellent first season for the Jays, but a 5-year deal for a reliever not named Mariano Rivera is rarely a god idea. A.J. Burnett had spent almost half the season on the DL, making just 21 starts, and, while he pitched well when he was healthy, he was hardly dominating (1.30 Whip, 3.98 ERA). Worst of all, afraid of losing Vernon Wells to free agency (to which he would have been eligible following 2007), J.P. and the Jays inked Wells to a 7-year, $126 million deal. While that deal was arguably market value for someone of Wells' calibre, one could also very easily argue that Wells had only had 2 really excellent seasons (2003 and 2006) and was just ok in between. But worse for me was the fact that Alex Rios had had a breakout season, both offensively and defensively, marred only by a staph infection. While Wells had been a great contributor to the Jays, it seemed pretty clear that Rios could handle centrefield for a fraction of the cost and the Jays could go elsewhere to get a corner outfielder, a position far easier and cheaper to fill than centre. While I was happy, as a fan, to see Wells back, from the team's perspective it seemed like bad business and the type of contract a mid-market team like the Jays could ill afford should it go wrong. In another move I thought was unnecessary, Ricciardi signed Lyle Overbay to a 4-year contract that off-season. Overbay, like Wells, was coming off one of the best years of his career (125 OPS+) but was under team control for two more seasons and similar players to Lyle had historically not aged very well. While Lyle was an above-average first-baseman on both sides of the ball in 2006, it hardly seemed necessary to sign him to a 4-year deal while he was still under team control for another two seasons.
Troy Glaus had had a good first season for the Jays, but Orlando Hudson, for whom Glaus was traded, had broken out offensively for Arizona and Aaron Hill had not yet emerged. And acquiring Glaus had created a logjam at third base when both Glaus nor Shea Hillenbrand objected to DHing, forcing the Jays to trade away the best fielder of the three, Corey Koskie, who the Jays had acquired expensively to play third just a season before and then were forced to give away at pennies on the dollar. These moves seemed like a man without a plan, squandering away chances when ownership had finally agreed to increase payroll.
Perhaps worst of all, JP's draft choices were looking dismal. JP's first first-rounder, Russ Adams had spectacularly flamed out as a starting SS (and second baseman) with an OPS+ of 56 and horrid defense. Aaron Hill, the subsequent first-round pick, looked like a capable regular but hardly a star (just 6 HRs and a .735 OPS in 2006). David Purcey, the 2004 first-rounder, had an awful season in the minors (1.66 Whip) and didn't look close to making the majors. And 2005 first-rounder Ricky Romero, who was picked because he was expected to move quickly through the minors, struggled at AA. While a few other pieces, like Casey Janssen and Shaun Marcum, mid-round draft picks by JP, looked decent in their Jays debuts, only Adam Lind, who had enjoyed an excellent season in the minors and a promising callup, and Travis Snider, the 2006 pick who had just a few at-bats under his belt and was only a few months out of high school, looked like they could be above-average regulars someday. My biggest criticism of Ricciardi at the time was that he lacked the imagination, spark, and creativity necessary for the Jays to contend with the monumental payrolls of the Yankees and Red Sox.
But things have changed since then. Sure, the B.J. Ryan deal tanked, as most multi-year deals to relievers are destined to. The Vernon Wells deal isn't looking any better (though Wells was the Jays' best offensive weapon last season) and the Overbay deal, while at reasonable cost, has hurt the Jays' flexibility a bit. But the market soon revealed the AJ Burnett deal to be the floor for extremely mediocre pitchers, making the Jays' deal with Burnett, a very good pitcher, about as much of a bargain as a long-term deal for a free-agent starter can be. When Burnett left, the Jays didn't go over the top to try to retain him, letting the Yankees pony up the big bucks for the talented, if mercurial, pitcher. The Jays locked up Alex Rios and Aaron Hill at very good deals for the team. Ricciardi took a chance on Scott Rolen for Troy Glaus, but Rolen has the better upside because of his talent on both sides of the ball.
And Ricciardi showed a real skill for picking up undervalued talent on the cheap. Scott Downs, originally picked up for nothing, turned into a dominant late-inning reliever. This was a smart pickup for the Jays - they saw that Downs had had a very good season as a starter in the hitters paradise league of the PCL, and bet correctly that it would translate into major-league success. Brian Tallet, for whom the Jays traded Bubbie Buzachero, turned into a quality reliever and now, it appears, a very effective starter. Marco Scutaro was acquired for two minor prospects and it appears that Ricciardi was among major-league GMs in seeing Scutaro as a quality major-league starting shortstop. And Scott Richmond was brought in from the Independent Northern League and has put together a very good half-season as a major-league starter. While most teams scrap-heap pickups are the like of Sidney Ponson, Ricciardi has brought in quality players like Tallet, Downs, Scutaro, and Richmond.
As for his draft picks, David Purcey, through fits and starts, has shown the potential to be a quality major-league starter. Ricky Romero has shown excellent stuff and poise on the mound and looks now to be a significant part of the team's future. Shaun Marcum emerged as a legitimate number 2 starter before Tommy John surgery put his career temporarily on hold, but all accounts are that he is recovering quite well. Adam Lind looks for all the world like a quality major-league hitter. Aaron Hill has emerged as a legitimate star second baseman. Travis Snider is one of the best-regarded prospects in all of baseball. Casey Janssen and Jesse Litsch have already made positive contributions to the team. And the 2007 draft class consists of Brett Cecil, one of the better left-handed starter prospects in baseball, and J.P. Arencibia, one of the top catching prospects in the game, as well as still-raw but full-of-potential young position players Kevin Ahrens, Justin Jackson, and John Tolisano. Ricciardi and his team have revamped their approach of "no number of college kids too many" and have diversified their approach by looking at prep school kids and international talent like Moises Sierra and Johermyn Chavez. The Jays farm system, ranked near the bottom at the 2006-2007 off-season, is now one of the better systems in the league.
And I would be remiss if I didn't mention the fact that Ricciardi has kept one of, if not the best, pitcher in the majors with Toronto for far below his market value. Doc has been nothing short of spectacular for the Jays and the young pitchers who have succeeded have often pointed to Halladay as mentor, example, and a significant contributor to their own success.
You are correct, of course, to say that Ricciardi's Jays haven't made the playoffs, and I also agree with you that has to be the ultimate gauge in judging a GM's performance. But I think Ricciardi has really improved and has learned from his mistakes (even when he hasn't admitted them, haha). Bringing in another GM will just start that learning curve all over again. Ricciardi isn't perfect but he has shown skill and perception and has put the Jays in position to contend in the near future without mortgaging their long-term prospects or putting us through a brutal rebuilding period. While he hasn't gotten the team to the playoffs, I'm not sure he isn't the best person to get us there at this point.
Tom: I should have known better than to debate a lawyer...they never know when to shut up. Where to start? Let's start with public relations; the man is a nightmare at it. From pissing off potential free agents (Adam Dunn) to ‘it's not a lie if we know the truth' to telling fans this summer that the team wouldn't compete, the man can't seem to open his mouth without saying something either stupid or insulting, but generally both. I guess the one that bothers me most at the moment is telling us the team wouldn't compete this year. Not only was he wrong, it was the wrong time to say it, in the middle of season ticket buying time. Why not sell folks on the excitement of watching young players and having a full season of Cito sitting on the bench. No instead it is ‘hey guys, we are going to be crappy this year but just wait until 2010'. Shouldn't trying to sell tickets be part of the job description for a GM or at least he shouldn't work against selling tickets.
His drafting? Well, I'd prefer not to decide he has improved at drafting until we get more than a month's worth of good major league play out of some of his picks. Yeah I'm glad he's off the ‘safe' college draft choice bandwagon, but let's see if any of these ‘full of potential' guys pan out before we say he's learned how to draft. If he is drafting so well, how come none of our minor league teams can win? Bill James used minor league records as one of several future performance indicators. It doesn't bode well for us since only one of our top four minor league teams has a win percentage above .400 (why does baseball insist on 3 digit ‘percentages'). If we are drafting well, why can't any of our minor league teams win?
I'll give in that Halladay's contract is a good one and Scott Downs was an amazing pick up. Hill's contract looks to be a good one. But then Wells, Rios, Ryan, Overbay ....it seems that he is shooting 50/50 at best on big contracts. And really isn't that how you'd want to judge a GM, on the big money contracts. Because the big contracts are what limit what a team can do in the future.
I do kind of agree that JP seems to learn from his mistakes but then he seems to be constantly making new mistakes. I guess my biggest complaint is, like you said, he doesn't seem to have a plan. Or at best, the plan changes by the season. So let's try someone that can make a plan and stick to it.
Hugo: Well, I'm tempted to say that it's typical for an engineer to resort to lawyer jokes when his arguments fail, but you make some excellent points so I won't. I agree with you that J.P. Ricciardi's skill at public relations is, shall we say, limited. I especially didn't like the way the Jays handled the offseason.
As far as the drafting goes, unless the draftees name is Longoria, you can't expect more from the draft class of 2007 than what J.P. has done. Brett Cecil looked darn good in the majors and J.P. Arencibia is one of the best catching prospects in the game. And other players from that draft are looking good as well. Sure, there are no sure things, but it's looking like a great class, and there's no doubt about how the Jays' farm system has pulled itself up to respectability in most experts' estimation. That's very encouraging, and the more the team can rely on its farm system the less you will see it looking to fill its needs via the free agent market, which is always a good thing.
1 recs |
63 comments
|
Comments
I agree with both sides
Woohoo Fence Sitting 101!
To expand on that, I love what our scouting has turned out with Hill, Cecil, JP, Romero, Purcey, Snider, Lind and Richmond.
Props to Hugo for mentioning Market Value with regards to Wells Contract
I disagree 100% with using minor leagues teams records as proof of their drafting/prospect calibre. The minors are used for people to learn things and hone their craft. It is not an accurate representation of potential. Especially considering that when someone really gets on a role they can get promoted and screw things up. Imagine your team is playing well and all of sudden you lose your #1 starter and to replace him your given someone who has been struggling? Tough.
And I still like the Rios deal.
All that being said JP should have had a filter for the offseason and last year with the whole Adam Dunn and competing things.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 9:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way....
I’m with you on the fence, I was hoping the exercise would push me off the fence….didn’t.
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, Ricciardi has made some questionable choices but.........
….if we played in another division, every single year we would either have a good chance to win the division or to grab the wild card. Too bad, we play in the damn AL East with two elephants in the same room! Right now we are one good offensive player plus one or two good starters and a good reliever away from being right on the same level as those two other teams of our division! Ricciardi could certainly be a good subject for a change inside the club but to me the biggest problem is: right now, in this very delicate moment, does the club have enough money to significantly increase the payroll to add some good players? Didn’t the club let go some front-office employees this offseason?
by Marco1978 on Jun 9, 2009 10:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
JP has said they could add at the deadline...
I think that’s when it’s most likely to see something happen.
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good argument on both sides
Its a tough debate because ultimately the players are still the ones on the field playing the game – not JP. I think JP has made some good and bad moves in the past… but just like Marco said in his comment… we play in the AL East and its just hard to win sometimes.
But JP says that if were are in it during July… he will get someone… so Im curious as to who could be that person possibly
by Aquamelli on Jun 9, 2009 10:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nick Johnson from the Nationals is a name mentioned all over the place....
I like him.
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Johnson would be a good pickup
he’s a high-OBP guy who has shown flashes of moderate power in the past (23HR in 147G in 2006, his last full season). However, he’s had lots of injury problems in the past and hasn played only 92 games spanning the 2007-2009 seasons. So far this year he is putting up an impressive 133 OPS+.
If the Jays end up as buyers at the deadline, he would be a good guy to go after. Maybe due to his recent injury troubles he can be gotten on the cheap (at least relative to other guys with similar stats).
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know. I've always hated the rent-a-player
How many have actually worked out. Ricky Henderson was a spectacular failure, even though we did win the WS. I would say that was a move that didn’t need to be made.
Having said that, If they can trade for someone they can control for a few years, like a corner OFer who can actually play in LF, I’d be happy. For how much I like Snider, I just don’t think he’s a good defensive player, and Lind is worse.
I just don’t like Johnson. He’s got a great eye, but I don’t know that I’d want to trade a Brad Mills or Justin Jackson for him. He’s essentially Overbay, anyways.
We don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. - Calvin
by solace on Jun 9, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd gladly take another Overbay
he’s leading the team in OBP and SLG at the moment and plays great defense. Can’t hurt to have another guy around. Yes, he’s an injury risk, but he puts up good stats and could be acquired not-too-expensively because of his injury history.
You are right about Snider and Lind’s adventures in LF (though Snider has shown a good arm and is still quite young, so he may have room for improvement). But hitting produces far more runs from a lower priority defensive position like corner OF (and even from moderate priority positions as well, but that’s another story). And with Wells and Rios manning the rest of the OF (even though Wells isn’t the OF he was in 2006), we can afford to have an average-to-below-average defender in LF if it means another plus bat in the lineup. If Snider isn’t yet ready to be that bat, I’d take a flier on Nick Johnson to DH and struggle through Lind in LF, assuming the price is right.
As well, though you balk at giving up a hot prospect for Nick Johnson, it would likely cost far less to obtain him than it would to get your ideal of a young, good bat, good glove corner OF with significant team control time left. Of course we all want to get a Nick Markakis or the like, but it’s gonna cost a hell of a lot more in prospects to get a guy like that than a Nick Johnson.
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, that first paragraph was poorly written
it should say "he’s leading the team in OBP and SLG at the moment and plays great defense. Can’t hurt to have another guy LIKE THAT around. Yes, JOHNSON IS an injury risk, but he puts up good stats and could be acquired not-too-expensively because of his injury history.
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
even though its too late...
i would have loved to have Nate McLouth
by Aquamelli on Jun 9, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya, that would have been great
especially for this season, since it looks like Snider could use some more time in AAA. Might have been a good idea to try to get in on that deal, since the cost of the trade is probably less than a deadline deal will be. Of course, for all we know, JP may have been trying to do that and gotten outbid, though there weren’t really any rumours about the Jays’ interest in McLouth.
That said, with another OF in the mix, we would have to trade someone when Snider is ready for the big time permanently (probably next season). We would have Snider, McLouth, Rios, Wells, Overbay, Lind for 3 OF spots, 1B and DH. Unfortunately, Rios, Wells and Overbay are probably not very tradeable due to their contracts, so the team probably wouldn’t have been significantly improved over the long run. Might have been nice to have good trading chip for the offseason, though.
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 digit percentage.
Tom, I think they use 3 digit because there is more than 100 games. If they only used 2 digits, teams with different records could end up with the ‘same’ 2 digit winning . (For example 106 wins = 65, 105 wins=65%). Three digits, 106 wins=0.654% and 105 wins=0.648.
Just a guess but makes sense to me…(kind of)
by masterkembo on Jun 9, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that certainly makes sense
If one wanted to be a stickler about it (and clearly I do), .654 is not a winning “percentage,” but is actually a winning “average,” since it represents the average frequency of wins by the team. It’s calculated and expressed the same was as batting average (which is also a true average). Interestingly, though OBP and SLG are calculated and expressed in much the same way, they are also not true percentages, they are averages.
Or, put another way: If a team is 33-27, their winning percentage would be expressed as 55%, while they winning average (or average frequency of wins) is .550.
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
JP has made questionable moves in the past
and I’ve been very critical of many. However, he has also shown great ability to find quality players for virtually nothing and to put together good, young, cheap pitching staffs behind Doc (AJ’s contract notwithstanding — as explained above it actually turned out to be quite a bargain on the open market).
There also seems to be a glut of quality pitching in the minors, even if the quality of position players is slightly lacking (though Arencibia and Snider are both very highly touted). I also tend to agree with the annoyingness of his inability to shut his mouth and hiring Gibbons to largely follow his direction rather than manage the team.
One thing that gets lost in the “fire JP” debate is that while he may not be the ideal GM, he has the team ready to compete in the near term. Bringing in another GM to clean house will ensure another several years of non-competing teams. As well, there is no guarantee that this hypothetical new GM will be any better than JP is. I think we need to consider that while it has taken longer than we’d like, JP has put together a competitive team at present and shaking things up is more likely to lead to immediate failure than to guarantee success.
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
There is a reason that the Jays have been making more money with TV ratings and gate receipts over the past couple of years.
JP made the team entertaining again and brought quite a few fans back. Myself included.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They are entertaining this year....
Last year less so.
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, they didn't win last year until the end of the season
so they weren’t that entertaining. But, as has been said before, they were a good team with a better pythagorean W-L than the Yankees and the Rays. It was a very good team, but certainly fatal flaws (poor situational hitting, the LF/DH black holes, some bad luck) doomed them to another mediocre result.
by SuckaMD on Jun 9, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t disagree with me!
Throws a wrench at Tom
But in all seriousness that’s why I mentioned the past couple of years. Although personally I enjoyed last year as well watching some of the pitchers and bullpen work, but that may just be me.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A wrench? Ive never had a wrench thrown at me before.....I've been married awhile, I've had lots of things thrown at me...
there was like a month or so they were entertaining last year….August I think…..
No they are great fun to watch this year. I even enjoy the losses because I think there is a chance. I love watching the young pitchers win or lose, watching young players is the best part of baseball because they can surprise you.
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
...and not only fun, but suprising
Look at the last couple games. We won the Romero vs Grienke game convincingly, was a Hugo Freaking Chavez HR away from being shut out against a kid with an ERA over 10 and then won last nights game against a guy who was 5-0 with Casey Janssen striking out people! What the hell?
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 9, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Raul Freaking Chavez...you mean....
unless, that’s Hugo’s last name and he moon lights as a backup catcher…wouldn’t surprise me
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha good catch.
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 9, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+ freaking 1 on that
despite his hitting woes…. ive enjoyed watching Snider in the outfield every time he played
by Aquamelli on Jun 9, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sportsillustrated article
Alot of talk around here in the “Pro-JP” circles has been his ability to draft well and develop young tallent. Interesting enough there is an article in SI.com ranking Jays as the 21st best team at drafting over the last decade. Article is here
I offer no commentary on its validity, I simply offer it as a FYI.
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 9, 2009 12:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ya know, Im starting to think drafting in the MLB is so hit and miss you can’t really gauge it. So many late bloomers and 1st round hit and miss guys its nuts.
Secondly there are plently of times that teams don’t draft a certain player because they know they will not be able to afford the bonuses that they demand. So teams like the Yankees and Sox and even the Tigers in recent years can go out and stock up their minor league system but signing players for a stupid amount over slot.
What a broken system.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For example, See Rick Porcello in Detroit. Kid dropped in the draft because teams thought he would be too expensive.
Now this looks great for the Tigers and bad on everyone else for passing on the kid. However it wasn’t like they missed his talent, They made a conscience informed financial decision to pass.
So in saying that I have to withdraw my argument for JP about his drafting choices. I still like what he has done with our system but I just can’t argue for both sides at once. The more I think about it the more I think it is impossible to gauge an MLB drafting ability due to the financial concerns that some teams face.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't really been following
But isn’t what they are saying about that “can’t miss prospect” in todays draft? Washington is afraid of what will cost to sign this kid. Scott Boras is his agent and might be asking $52M. That is rediculous. Scott Boras and the Yankees are ruining baseball.
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 9, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remarkable enough...
Some collegues at work and I are having a similar conversation regarding draft prospects… he sent around that SI article as well saying it proves the Jays suck (he is a Tigers fan). He then proceeded to say that the funniest thing about all of this are the unsigned prospects, how they would rather go back into the draft then sign with the team. This was my response:
The ones are doing that are very good players.
Plus, you spend one more year playing rookie ball and all of a sudden you’re a year older and little more of a sure thing prospect. You get ranked higher because of your age and skill level being higher and then you get sign for even more money over slot.
Considering most people spend 3-4 years in the minors, spending one extra year in a non-pro league while still honing your craft is a no brainer. It gets you into a higher draft class with higher signing bonuses and slot amounts.
It isn’t like the NHL where the players are vaulted to the AHL or close to NHL in 1 to 2 years and spending another year in the QMJHL or OHL or WHL, There are also age concerns, players play ball a lot longer then players play hockey.
What would you do, sign with a team for a small amount of money, and spend the next 3 or 4 years driving around on a bus playing in minor league stadiums in front of a couple thousand people (at most?). Or refuse to sign, spend 1 extra year in a non-pro league driving around on a bus playing in minor league stadiums in front of maybe a thousand people and then sign for a larger amount of money and spend the next 2-3 years doing the same?
Your still driving around on a bus, but your richer.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yes that is the fear from the Nationals but I think the consensus is that they will pay whatever to get the Kid and that he could be in the majors as early as Sept Callups this year.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think they actually said
he will not pitch in the majors this season
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I heard something at some point different but I admit that could of changed now, That being said when I first heard it I thought it was the dumbest thing I had heard in awhile.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
i saw that a month (at least) ago, so they may have changed their stance. i think it’s a little insane to have him pitch in the majors this year unless they want to do so just to sell tickets.
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn’t put it past em.
I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. - Dogbert
by JohnnyG on Jun 9, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what, i think SBN is screwing around on me
i actually said “i think it’s a little insane to pitch him in the majors, although it would sell some tix”
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
JP and Moneyball
I would fire the heck out of him. While I was at it, i would call the A’s and get them to fire Moneyball Beane too. The two of them have coasted on their reputations/legends for too long….when you actually look at the A’s , what they accomplished can be summed up as this:
they did well when they combined the good pitching caused by their pitcher friendly ballpark with good hitting caused by steroid friendly hitters…
the jays under JP were ‘built’ the same way, except they lacked the juicers Giambi, Tejada etc—-and until Cito came in last year, started preaching, if not small, then at least ‘smaller’ ball, and brought up Adam Lind, the Jays were a floundering 500 team full of 270 hitters with some pop.
And don’t forget that without Halliday being a saint and accepting approximately $10 million A YEAR less than his market value ($15 million this year), this discussion would be academic, because even management in a brain free sports management town like toronto would have fired JP.
so unless it can be proven that Doc is only staying here because JP has some strange psychic hold on him, then JP should be shunted to the dustbin of history a la Moneyball.
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 1:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's a strange comment
Ricciardi built the Jays of the past few years around pitching and defense, not “steroid-friendly hitters” (whatever that means) or high-OBP hitters. If anything, one could say JP built one of the first post-steroid era teams with the Jays, even signing Thomas, the poster boy for steroid-free slugging. And as a former scout, JP has never really been a true Beane disciple – he likes to see his players, he likes undervalued, utility-type guys, and he likes them to be hustlers. Without taking a position on Beane, JP really isn’t very much like Beane at all.
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
by hugo on Jun 9, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nitpicking
(agreeing with hugo, this argument is really odd)
Cito had nothing to do with Lind being brought up, he had played two partial seasons (i think 88 games each) already, not including his September callup. Maybe Cito helped him become the hitter we knew he’d be, and maybe he just needed the MLB experience (after a great minor league career). Either way, it’s not at all a bad thing on JP… certainly he should be applauded for drafting him.
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not a strange comment---
I didn’t say the Jays were built around steroid friendly hitters—-the A’s were….the reason the jays haven’t achieved the success of the early 2000’s A’s is that while the jays patterned themselves after the A’s in their usage of good OBP and decent power hitting players, they neglected to add the ingredient which pushed the A’s to the ‘top’, namely a couple of slugging juiceheads (with exception of a couple of Troy Glaus years)
also i wouldnt call signing thomas an indication of post steroid thinking…rather a stinging indictment of JP’s slavish adhesion to Moneyball principles. JP signed Thomas after his comeback with the A’s—-blatantly aping Beane’s moves. But he neglected to think of how a 265 pound aging behemoth would fit in with a field turf, gap hitting, base running team like the jays…
as for the defence, while Overbay and Rolen are exceptional for their positions, the rest of the infield while good, benefit tremendously from the guaranteed bounces and true hops of the Skydome…and while Wells is an above average center fielder, Rios is all potential, little realized.
as for the pitching, the fact that the jays can consistently trot out numerous kids who succeed, even in the short term, suggests a spectacular pitching coach—-I don’t know whether JP can be directly credited for that, be it is definitely a feather in his cap.
as for your comment that JP liking hustiling, utility type players (code for white guys), how is this different from Billy beane? my point is that a lineup full of such players and good pitching will win you a max of 85-90 games. to get you into the playoffs, fielding a lineup of slow guys clogging the basepaths, you need the base clearing of a Giambi or a tejada.
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 4:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Funny
I hadn’t heard that infielders of other teams enjoy playing on the field turf at SkyDome or feel like they benefit from the “guaranteed bounces and true hops” there. I have heard the exact opposite of that quite a bit though.
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
by hugo on Jun 9, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
with regards to Rios' defence
pretty sure he’s universally recognized as one of the best defensive outfielders in the game (though i actually haven’t looked at UZR numbers myself)
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so the argument here is that teams should have neither
hustling, utility-type players nor “steroids-friendly” sluggers with high on-base percentages?
"The NY Mets are my favorite squadron" -- Apu Nahasapeemapetilon
by jessef on Jun 9, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
correction re. above
in my bit about frank thomas, i meant to say that thomas doesnt fit in with what the jays should be, not are—— namely, a team that takes advantage of skydome to be gap hitting and base running…
i think the template for a successful jays team was laid out in early 90’s….lineup of quick players who can steal and take the extra base, who can hit balls to the gap, who can run out high baltimore chops in the infield….the pitchers should aim to take advantage of the ‘true bounces’ to give up lots of groundballs and dp’s….
it worked well before, and we are one good left handed bat from reaching that now…. or, if wells and/or rios started hitting 40 points higher now, it would work now too….
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 4:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Rios and Wells hit 40 points higher
And the rest of the team played roughly the same, this would be an unstoppable lineup. I have very little confindence that they can get the job done anymore. Remember when Delgado was at bat and there was someone on 2nd it seemed like he always drove him in. Of course I could still have rose coloured glasses about Carlos but he was the greatest Jay cleanup hitter ever.
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 9, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no doubt Carlos is
likely the best hitter to ever play for the Jays, not to mention one of my favourite players ever. But of course him being great doesn’t mean that Wells and Rios aren’t any good or can’t be part of a winning Jays team – the two of them have had some pretty good seasons for the Jays as well.
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
by hugo on Jun 9, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not stating that Rios and Wells aren't any good.
I am just talking about my confidence in the players, as a fan. With a runner on 2nd, I was confident Carlos would get the job done. With Rios and Wells unfortunately I got so pessimistic that they would ground out to Short or pop up.
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 9, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
funny---infield's bounces are great home field ad for team
there is an obvious marked difference between the way the ball bounces in skydome (and other ersatz surfaced locales) and the way it bounces in grass surfaced stadia….just look at the how far from home plate the fielders (especially second baseman) can play, and how many singles to outfield are turned into doubles to wall….
as home team accustomed to this, jays possess a large advantage both when fielding and pitching) and hitting and running (knowing when to take extra base etc…0
that some fielders from visiting teams complain (as you claim—-i have never read this) about the field would further buttress my argument that jays enjoy a significant advantage here—— since the experience of playing on such a surface favors the home team
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 5:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
every team caters to their home ballpark
The Rangers have a lineup full of homerun hitters because of their ballpark, the Padres/As etc. have strong pitching staffs because of playing in pitchers parks etc. etc.
Onions Baby Onions
by ohmybosh on Jun 9, 2009 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed--- all teams cater to their ballpark
or at least should…although there could be a chicken/egg scenario with some teams and parks (i.e is jake peavy that good or only good because of petco)….
that being said, the jays should field a team that takes advantage of skydome’s quirks—-and i think the early 90’s Jays showed us what the constituent parts of such a team are…
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 5:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
payroll
yanks have had highest payroll by far and havent won world series in 9 years…rays made it to world series with no payroll (albeit lots of draft choices)
jays are 1 very good hitter away from playoffs (as they were last year) and can get that hitter by trading away some prospects
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 5:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The point I was making about payroll
was that the Jays were third in MLB in payroll in 1992 and first in 1993. In 2009, the Jays are 16th in baseball. There are nine teams spending at least 25 M USD more. Joe Carter and Jack Morris were the sixth and seventh (respectively) highest-paid players in the game. No one on today’s team is even in the top-10.
"The NY Mets are my favorite squadron" -- Apu Nahasapeemapetilon
by jessef on Jun 9, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
A. it’s impossible to buy the world series, the best you can do is buy a playoff spot
B. number of games the Rays won (2001 – 2008): 62, 55, 63, 70, 67, 61, 66, 97. It’s very easy to say you’d rather be a Rays fan now, but what about just two years ago?
"The NY Mets are my favorite squadron" -- Apu Nahasapeemapetilon
by jessef on Jun 9, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what trade would you suggest?
propose something
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
by hugo on Jun 9, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love Johnson but I have this feeling the only young pitcher the Nationals would want is Cecil
and I’m not giving him up easy. With Litsch gone for a long while I’d be careful giving up someone that’s sure to be good. I can’t imagine the Nats wanting Richmond or Ray but never know I guess.
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Nats might want Purcey
what would you think about that deal?
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
by hugo on Jun 9, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Purcey a lot, I hate to give up on a guy that strikes people out
since we have so many ‘pitch to contact’ guys. Can I think about it for a month, see if we are still in the race?
by Tom Dakers on Jun 9, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this idea floated through my head recently
Why not try him out in the bullpen? he’s got a plus fastball and solid breaking pitches and he can come in, throw hard and get out. seems to me he’s not so good at changing speeds.
plus, he’s a lefty.
i’d love to hear arguments to the contrary, it was just an idea.
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
only problem is that
a relief pitcher with a high walk rate isn’t very trustworthy. If he can control his pitches better, he’d be a great reliever I think. Of course, if he could do that, he’d be a great starter.
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
by hugo on Jun 9, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
definitely true
maybe if he didn’t have to worry he’d be able to work on his command more. you’re right though.
Prehistoric Hoops - a neat little Raps blog
by boo15749 on Jun 9, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
payroll in 92,93
while we may have had the highest payroll then, i don’t think the disparity between number 1 and number 16 was as high as it is now…i dont have numbers in front of me, but i am sure payrolls were much more closely bunched then than now
that being said, our payroll definitely suffices to get into playoffs last year and this year—- considering we pay halliday about 10-15 million less than market rate because he is our martyr (god bless him) the ‘value’ of our team’s payroll is close to top 8 —-which is the number of teams that get into playoffs…
as for attendance, i don’t think getting into playoffs for a couple years would be a panacea…at best it would increase our attendance to 35,000—-a far cry from the 50,000 we averaged back in the day but still very good…the major impediment to attendance is probably the misuse of the skydome——keeping the roof closed most of the time…as i and many others have stated before, with the roof open, the skydome is a nice to very nice place to see a game
with the roof closed it is one of the worst in the majors
by norm depalma on Jun 9, 2009 8:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
true
the differences in the large and small payrolls is very different today, but how do you figure that Doc brings the Jays to 8th highest payroll? Assume he should be making 10 M more than he does, Jays are now at 90 M, which is still 14th in MLB.
As far as getting into the playoffs, my point about TB was that it’s easy for bandwagon fans to want the team to suck for years in exchange for one good season, but I think die-hards would rather the team be competitive year-in and year-out.
"The NY Mets are my favorite squadron" -- Apu Nahasapeemapetilon
by jessef on Jun 9, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about that
but I think die-hards would rather the team be competitive year-in and year-out.
Competitive every year yes, but the problem with the Jays is they are stuck in perpetual pergatory. Never too far down, but never good enough for the playoffs. Would I rather be a Jays fan and always be around .500 or a Marlins fan, win a WS every 6 years and in between have a terrible team? I honestly don’t know my answer.
Happiness is a long walk with a putter in your hand.
by craig in calgary on Jun 10, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














