Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Jays financial situation for 2011

 

There’s been a lot of talk lately about the Jays’ offseason, what should be done, and how much money the team will have to spend on acquiring new players. Unfortunately, it seems like not everyone is always on the same page with regards to player costs and savings from various transactions. Therefore, I have created the following list to provide an estimate of what various moves will cost the Jays for the 2011 season and how to come up with money to sign new players (e.g. Manny, Pena, Thome, etc).

This post is meant as a combination reference manual (with 2010 salaries, 2011 guaranteed salaries where applicable, and my estimates for arbitration raises where applicable) and suggestion guide for where I see the Jays going this offseason. Feel free to quibble with my numbers and suggestions, though I think my arbitration raise estimates are probably pretty good. As well, I use only salary numbers, not including pro-rated bonuses.

A huge thanks goes out to Cot's Contracts, a great website that you should all refer to frequently for all your MLB contract, free agency, and arbitration reference needs.

 

On to the $$$.

Star-divide

 

Coming off the books – Doc ($10M), Ryan ($6M), Ruiz ($400k) = $16.4M total

 

Player name      2010 salary                  2011 comment

           

Under contract for 2011 (total guaranteed raises =$16.25M)

 

Lind                 $400k                          $5M = $4.5M raise

Wells                $12.5M                        $23M = $10.5M raise

Romero            minimum                      $750K = $0.25M raise

A Hill               $4M                             $5M = $1M raise

Johnny Mac      $1.5M                          $1.5M = no raise

 

So, the guaranteed raises for our players already signed in 2011 completely accounts for the money saved by no longer paying players not to play for us. Thus, if we are to sign Manny, Pena, or any other FA’s and keep the payroll around 2010 numbers, we need to find savings elsewhere.

 

Still under team control

These guys are not yet arbitration eligible, so the Jays can do as they please with them, essentially. They are paid around the minimum salary each year, which generally comes to between $400-450k, but I like to assume $500k for simplicity of calculation.

Our pre-arbitration guys who should make the team are: Snider, Cecil, and JP2. Others include Rzep…, Drabek, Roenicke, Carlsson, Mills, Mastroianni, Ray and basically anyone else in the minors.

 

Now is where the fun begins. First, let’s look at potential free agents and the returns in money saved and draft picks they will return. 

Free Agents

(losing Type A gets sandwich pick and pick from signing team, Type B just sandwich)

Overbay           $7M                    non-typed FA

Downs             $4M                       Type A FA – assume he will get $5M for 2011 on the FA market

Frasor              $2.65M                  Type A FA

Buck                $2M                       Type B FA

Gregg               $2M                        $4.5M if pick up option – optional raise of $2.5M – type B FA

J Molina           $0.8M                    $1M club option

 

I figure we will keep Molina as the back up catcher, costing an additional $200k, which can also come out of the money saved from Ruiz’s contract coming off the books. Overbay should be non-tendered, saving $7M. I think we offer arbitration to all the other guys on the list. I doubt any of them will accept, since they can probably get multiyear deals on the open market. If we lose all the remaining guys plus Overbay, we can save $17.65M through attrition. I however, hope we keep Downs, so that will cost ~$5M. If that happens, we have ~$12.5M saved so far (I fudged the figure from $12.65M to $12.5M).

 

Arbitration eligibles

Now let’s look at the guys from our 2010 roster who are arbitration eligible for the 2011 season. Since guys usually get raises in the arbitration, I will assume everyone will get one should they go to arbitration, though some guys probably will get a very minimal raise, largely insignificant to the overall payroll numbers.

 

Bautista           $2M                          raise of ~$6M ($8M this season in arb or pre-arb signing)

E5                    $4.75M                        assume raise of ~$1M if resigned

Tallet                $2M                             minimal raise

Escobar            minimum                      raise of $1M

Lewis               minimum                     raise of $0.5M

Morrow           minimum                 raise of $0.5M

Marcum           $850k                          raise of $1.5M

Camp               $1.15M                        raise of $0.5M

Janssen $700k                          raise of $0.25M

Litsch               minimum                    minimal raise

Wise                minimum                    raise of $0.5M

McGowan        minimum                     minimal raise    

S Hill                minimum                   raise of $0.25M

Buckholz          $1.05M                        raise of $0.5M

Accardo           $1.08M                        raise of $0.25M

 

Some guys are obviously going to be back. First is Bautista, either through the arbitration process or signing a deal to avoid arbitration. So that’s $6M we need to spend. Then we are definitely keeping Escobar, Morrow, and Marcum. By my estimation, that’s $3M more for a total of $9M. I think we also keep Camp, Janssen, S. Hill , either Lewis or Wise, and either Buckholz or Accardo. I estimate that will cost raises of ~$2M total bringing arbitration raises to ~$11M on top of 2010 levels.

Tallet is an obvious non-tender. I also figure we non-tender one of Buckholz or Accardo (I’d probably prefer Buckholz). So we save $3M on them, bringing our total savings to present to ~$4.5M (assuming we keep Downs and with a small fudge factor to keep the numbers round).

 

So, before we start signing FA’s and figuring out what to do with E5 and other bubble arb-eligible guys, I figure we have the following on the 2011 squad: 

Starting position players: Lind, Wells, Hill, Bautista, Escobar, Snider, JP2

Backup position players: J-Mac, Molina, Lewis/Wise (4th OF)

Starting pitchers: Romero, Marcum, Cecil, Morrow, Drabek/S Hill/Rzep

Relievers: Downs, Camp, Roenicke, Janssen, Accardo, S Hill/Rzep

 

If we non-tender E5, that gives us ~$9M to spend, assuming we don’t go above our 2010 payroll. If we figure Manny or Pena will cost about $8M for 2011, we are left with $1M to play around with and we don’t have a third starting OF (if Bautista plays 3B) or 3B (if Bautista plays RF). We may also need to fill out our bullpen, though that can probably be done internally with relatively cheap guys like Carlsson, Buckholz/Accardo, S Hill, Rzep…, etc. I will leave it to the discussion board how good such a bullpen would actually be.

One proposed solution is to call up Mastroianni, put him in CF for his defense, move Wells to RF (where he would be a plus defender) and put Bautista at 3B. This could easily work, leave money to sign a big bat FA (Manny preferably, or Pena, etc.). Depending on need and Rogers’ willingness to add a bit more payroll, we could also acquire a relatively cheap 5th starter and/or reliever (Jeff Francis?) while staying close to the 2010 payroll. Another suggestion has been to trade for Colby Rasmus, who is not yet arbitration eligible and thus would be playing for ~$0.5M. This would require trading some serious players/prospects, and rejiggering the offseason goals somewhat. However, perhaps we could offer up some of our minor league depth at C (Perez, D’Arnaud, JP2, etc) to make this or another good deal happen.

Anyway, I leave it to the discussion board to hash out what people think the Jays should do. But I thought it would be a good and important resource for people to know the Jays financial obligations for the 2011 season before discussing possible personnel moves.

Comment 57 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great post, thanks for the research!

However, I disagree with this

keep the payroll around 2010 numbers

There has (as far as I know) never been an indication that the Jays wouldn’t be willing to raise payroll for next year. They’ve shown a willingness to spend $100M in the past, and I’m sure if AA feels as though he has an appropriate trade or freeagent signing that he can convince the upper echelon to spend the money.

For all I know, the payroll does stay the same, but if so, I think that’s moreso due to following a plan (that has the team contending in 2012 or 2013), then it is because of payroll limitations implemented by Rogers.

by masterkembo on Oct 27, 2010 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Wells

Wells earned $21m last year. He received a bonus of $8.5m on March 1.

by ayjackson on Oct 27, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

since you’re not accruing bonuses, you should recongize them when actually paid.

by ayjackson on Oct 27, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

fair enough

it was just easier to go with straight salary numbers rather than deal with bonuses and such.

Given that the Jays paid an additional $8.5M to Wells last year, if they were willing to spend that amount again this year, that would essentially pay for a Manny-type player right there, leaving the rest of the money that I described above to go after other players or save for future transactions. That makes their financial situation look even better.

by SuckaMD on Oct 27, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Romero

Earned a $1.25m signing bonus in addition to his $400k base salary.

by ayjackson on Oct 27, 2010 1:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Guys we can't sign Manny

he’s a type A free agent.

Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!

by boo15749 on Oct 27, 2010 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought that too

but he won’t be offered arbitration, so he won’t be a type A

by lambo on Oct 27, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair

We certainly COULD sign a type A free agent. It’s just highly unlikely that we will. Of course, since Manny won’t be offered arbitration, it is irrelevant for him.

If Rogers decides they want to open up the cashboxes to sign a type-A free agent, that is A-OK with me.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Oct 27, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

The key thing is that we can't sign exactly one type A free agent

If we sign two, then the second one only costs a second round pick, which is nothing when you figure we could be getting multiple first round picks from our departing type As that can’t be lost to compensation.

They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.

by Torgen on Oct 27, 2010 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Damn Math… How does it work?

by JohnnyG on Oct 27, 2010 2:33 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Rogers is willing to spend the money when the right moment comes along. Payroll will be increased this year due to the fact of all the arbitration that will happen. Rogers media president Keith Pelly has confirmed this with his appearance on Prime Time with Bob McCown. He said “Rogers wants to win a World Series” I do believe that means spending money to get there.

by Selects10 on Oct 27, 2010 5:44 PM EDT reply actions  

That would be great

but one of the reasons behind my post is to show what could be done even without going cap in hand to management. If they want to throw an extra $10M or so at AA, all the better, but I think the team can be very successful and productive this offseason without taking on a lot more payroll (if that’s the decision that’s made).

by SuckaMD on Oct 27, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

We´ve signed Molina... 1 million is fix...

"Without a catcher we´ll have a lot of passed balls!" Casey Stengel

by jaysfanfromeurope on Oct 27, 2010 5:56 PM EDT reply actions  

well technically

they probably had to sign the option to effect it. but the same thing really. : )

btw, enjoyed my time in Calgary, but didn’t have enough time to look you up for a drink. apologies.

by ayjackson on Oct 27, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh… SBNation is really messing up for me at home. I can’t navigate comment threads anymore. Z, Shift A nothing will work. I’ve tried clearing history, reinstalling the browser. It doesn’t seem to help.

by JohnnyG on Oct 27, 2010 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Question for All...

We keep talking about throwing 8Mill at Manny, and a bit of money to plug the other holes… But what about going big after Carl Crawford… not sure what he’s going to be making, but assuming it’s something crazy like 20 Mill a season… Wouldn’t spending the extra 10 or 11 be well worth it… It would solve the lead off spot, the speed, defense and would make us a contender.. Thoughts???

Just thinking but…
Crawford CF, Escobar SS, Wells RF, Lind 1B, Bautista 3B, Hill 2B, Snider LF, JPA DH, Molina C

by Lanky07 on Oct 27, 2010 10:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I would love to have Crawford here, but I don’t think he will happen. It has been somewhat known that he wants off turf and the way the Rays tried to rest him off the turf as much as possible seems to support that.

by JohnnyG on Oct 27, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very true

Forgot all about the turf issue…

by Lanky07 on Oct 28, 2010 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

JPA DH, Molina C = fail

and I don’t think Crawford has played much if any CF in his career—not sure if he has the arm.

They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.

by Torgen on Oct 28, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

he's played about 400 innings in centre in his career

so some, but probably not enough to draw any conclusions about his fielding ability there

by benk on Oct 28, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't see why he wouldn't be good in Center

he has great speed, maybe not the greatest arm but if he gets to all the balls, who cares about the arm.

by Tom Dakers on Oct 28, 2010 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Runners at third

They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.

by Torgen on Oct 28, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Would you rather Vernon in CF???

Of course we could just leave vernon in CF and put Carl in LF.. Either way, I’d rather have him in CF.. Just a thought tough…

As for the JPA DH and Molina at C.. why a fail… gives JPA a chance to get used to major league pitching, and us a solid defensive catcher.. JPA isn’t the long term solution at C anyways, might as well see what kind of bat he has and maybe he get ’s moved to 1B later anyways…

by Lanky07 on Oct 28, 2010 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

and why isn't JPA a possible solution at catcher?

the guy is well-regarded defensively and is still improving, and if he can hit for power in the bigs anything like he has in the minors, he’ll be a very solid catcher in the Majors

besides, we should try to address the DH hole through free agency

by benk on Oct 29, 2010 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not only do I not understand why people have decided that JP2 is not the solution at catcher

for the reasons benk just outlined, but I further don’t get why everyone has decided that Molina is such an amazing defender. When I watched him this season (I probably watched about half the games), I saw a guy who doesn’t move very well anymore and has trouble blocking balls in the dirt to his side. I didn’t see a phenomenal arm and he certainly can’t hit.

I can’t imagine JPA will be significantly worse defensively and his numbers in the minors show he should develop into a much better hitter. But his projected batting line this season does not warrant a regular DH spot.

I this most people see around league average OPS as a good benchmark. He may not put up a great OBA, but Molina’s was .304 this season, so he can’t be much worse, and he’ll post a better SLG. These numbers are fine at catcher, but would be unacceptable from a DH and a FA DH who hits better than this will be easy and cheap to find.

by SuckaMD on Oct 29, 2010 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

You didn't see a phenomenal arm?

Molina threw out 44% of guys dumb enough to try to steal off him. There were too many wild pitches with him but then he did a terrific job with Brandon Morrow. I wouldn’t want Molina as an everyday catcher either but as a backup I’m ok with it.

by Tom Dakers on Oct 29, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

agree

plus Molina is awesome Morrow and will provide much needed leadership for JP and the whole team without complaining for more playiing time

by lambo on Oct 29, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

okay, I stand corrected

I still don’t want him as a starter. As a backup and for ~$1M, I’m fine with him. But JP2 should still start

by SuckaMD on Oct 29, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, and that 44% doesn’t count the number of runners who don’t bother to steal because they are worried they’ll get thrown out. It’s a little like outfield assists. For a little while, base runners will try to take an extra base and a really good arm will rack up the assists. Then the base runners stop trying to take the extra base and the assists go way down. It’s not that the arm has gone bad, but the opportunities have dried up.

Last year was very pleasant from a base stealing perspective. After years of opponents running wild of the bases, this year our catchers pretty much nullified it. Even Buck improved by using the throwing from the knees technique.

by siggian on Oct 29, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

JPA at 1B is also a fail

It’s all about the defensive spectrum.

They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.

by Torgen on Oct 29, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really don't get it

why does everyone insist on putting JP anywhere but catcher?

by SuckaMD on Oct 29, 2010 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

agreed

"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman

by hugo on Oct 30, 2010 6:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because 6 years of a mediocre player

is apparently better than 6 years of a very good one and then his knees explode a few years into his big Yankees/Red Sox contract.

They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.

by Torgen on Oct 31, 2010 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't get it

are you assuming Arencibia is going to be a mediocre Major Leaguer? I think there’s a perfectly legitimate possibility he could be a top-10 maybe even top-5 catcher in the bigs.

by benk on Oct 31, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think his point

is that a good hitting catcher often makes a mediocre-hitting 1st baseman/dh so it’s more valuable to keep Arencibia at catcher

"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman

by hugo on Oct 31, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

.750-.800 OPS is more than acceptable from a catcher, but I definitely don’t want my 1B hitting like that

by SuckaMD on Oct 31, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

certainly

besides that JPA is pretty good defensively, he could (but of of course also may not) be a top-tier catcher

by benk on Oct 31, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great financial thumbnail! Very thorough synopsis.

However, most of the comments on here fly in the face of reality. The new manager, John Farrell, stated his objectives very clearly: At end the 2011 season, fifth in the AL East in both ERA (10th at 4.22 in 2010, Yankees were 5th at 4.06) and runs scored (6th in 2010, 105 runs behind Yankees).

Jays pitching in 2011 should improve dramatically at 5th starter. Rzepchynski had 2.31 ERA his last four starts after coming back from a broken finger injury. I believe Hill’s ERA was 2.61 in Sept.; his location and stuff were good but he needs to work up arm strength. Drabek will push the top five hard.

The article’s suggested 2011 bullpen stinks, pure and simple. Only closer is Accardo, who: (1) had a MLB ERA over 8.00 in 2010 ( 2) enjoys a pathological hatred of the Blue Jays’ organization.

In American English, Kevin Gregg closes real good and real adventurous and chews gum better. Let’s kiss him goodbye to save some dough, even though his save rate was 86% in 2010. Rest of pen were 8-18 or 44% successful.

One other thing. Who’s Manny? Is he the ageing guy who can still hit a little, but reminds people of Milton Bradley?

by BumWino on Oct 28, 2010 4:05 AM EDT reply actions  

no he's the guy...

who would project to be one of our two best hitters – even at 39

by ayjackson on Oct 28, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's a guy who put up an OBA>.400 and 2WAR at the plate in half a season (322 PA)

Which is well worth $8M in salary for an entire season. Give him 650PA at DH and, even with mild regression of his stats, and he’ll put up 3-3.5WAR easy.

by SuckaMD on Oct 28, 2010 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

i don't understand your bullpen assessment at all

(or your Manny assessment but that’s been covered already). first you say that we should get rid of Kevin Gregg (which enough other people think too) because he maybe wasn’t as good as his numbers suggest. but only using W-L and S numbers, you point out that the rest of the bullpen was far worse. you also describe how Accardo “stinks” despite pitching 6.2 Majors innings in 2010 and putting up ERAs of 3.00 and 3.48 the past two years in an extremely hitter-friendly AAA environment. you also state he “hates” the Blue Jays – maybe it’s because we have really only given him one real shot after his absolutely excellent 2007 (64 games, 30 saves, 2.14 ERA, 2.5 WAR).

Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!

by boo15749 on Oct 28, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Downs could easily be the closer

and we would plug Purcey (who I stupidly left off the list of team controlled guys) into his former LOOGY/Lefty set up role. Camp, Accardo or Roenicke would become the righty setup man and could be given opportunities to close as needed/wanted. I think a back end of the bullpen of Downs, Accardo/Roenicke/Camp, and Purcey would be solid. Filling out the back end are Camp, Roenicke, Rzep, and Janssen who are all capable pitchers.

Not the most amazing bullpen on paper, but I think more than capable and with good potential for improvement. Perhaps there are other relatively cheap guys available on the FA market, but I think we can put together a solid bullpen internally if we need to save money. Plus, relievers are notoriously difficult to project, so spending money on a big name FA reliever (aside from a few top notch studs) isn’t usually a good risk.

by SuckaMD on Oct 29, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

The article’s suggested 2011 bullpen stinks, pure and simple.

Actually, that doesn’t strike me as that bad a bullpen. I disagree with the OP on the contents a bit because I think the Jays will bring back Gregg over Accardo.

Gregg is an average closer. He has definite weaknesses that prevent him from being an elite closer and I don’t think that he can overcome them. On the other hand, when used properly, he can be effective. To my mind, you don’t get rid of him until you know you can replace him with a better closer. I don’t think the Jays have identified that better closer yet.

Downs, Camp, Roenicke, Janssen, Accardo, S Hill/Rzep

Downs has been incredibly reliable over the years. For a reliever, that’s unusual. He may have the occasional hiccup, but when the season ends, he just ends up with the same numbers year after year. You do have to wonder when he will decline though as he is getting up there in years.

Camp also had a good year last year and he’s actually improved the last 3 years he’s pitched for the Jays. He is also the same age as Downs so age is a concern. But overall, he’s been pretty effective as a reliever.

Roenicke has the stuff to be a closer but the control eludes him. I think he can fill the spot reliever role but I wouldn’t trust him with the game on the line unless I had to. You can do worse than him and you can do better.

Jannsen had a bounce back year and was effective for the most part. I think he can repeat.

Frasor was missing off the list but he could also be a reliever. It’s entirely possible no team signs him because it will cost draft picks so he could be back. He was also effective last year.

Hill or Scrabble can both be effective as relievers. In particular, I think I’d rather see Hill there because I think Scrabble has more types of pitches.

by siggian on Oct 29, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correction

That should read “5th in the American League,” not “5th in AL East.”

by BumWino on Oct 28, 2010 4:12 AM EDT reply actions  

You lost me at "ACCARDO"

Pay him 20M$ to stay away!

Festina Lente

by HESS2479 on Oct 29, 2010 2:38 PM EDT reply actions  

i'm sorry but i really do not get the hatred for Accardo

the guy has put up ERA+es of 210 and 175 while in Toronto. 2008 wasn’t great by any strech, but judging his 2010 as giving any information as to his career potential is laughable. especially considering he has posted two straight seasons in AAA (in an insane hitter’s environment) with ERAs under 3.50. not seeing the reason to hate him at all.

by benk on Oct 29, 2010 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

never mind about 2009

upon further review it was, in fact, quite bad

by benk on Oct 29, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ignore the man season behind the curtain!

by JohnnyG on Oct 29, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about our heroic azure-tinged corvidae, the Toronto Blue Jays.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Brett Lawrie's historic defensive prowess

Recent FanPosts

Small
Jays Future Closer?
N41306733_31278203_7401_steve_golfin_small
my MLB power ranking, May Edition
Jaysfanimage_small
Blue Jays Farm Report - Apr 29-May 5
Jaysfanimage_small
BBBers on Twitter
Grain-of-salt_small
An Open Letter to John Farrell (and the Blue Jays front office)
Small
WAR worries?
Small
NHL Mentality?
Profiel_small
Bluebirdbanter League at Fangraphs the Game
Small
Frustration...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Bluejayperched_small hugo

Rincewind-1_small Tom Dakers

Assistant Manager

Smith_up_small JohnnyG

Authors

Hiro_small jessef

Profile_small masterkembo

Profiel_small Woodman663

Minorleaguer_small Minor Leaguer

Tony_fernandez_small TonyFernandezSavedMyLife

Moderators

J_bau_small jays182

Aejfuulciaar18g_small Bowling_Guy25