Recommended roster moves and predictions for 2011
A lot of the roster seems set for 2011 but the following decisions need to be made:
Catcher - Whether to try to sign John Buck or not? Also, whether or not to exercise Jose Molina's option. A lot depends on where JPA is in his development. Unfortunately we haven't seen very much of him at the major league level. It seems a little early to hand him the #1 catcher's job. The draft pick for John Buck is also tempting as he has had a career year and is likely to regress a bit. I'd like to see John Buck and JPA with JPA getting some extra at bats either at DH or at first (if he can play there). I wouldn't be too bothered about other options however.
1st base - Adam Lind, signing Overbay, signing EE, Jose Bautista, or a free agent. I'd like to see Adam Lind play up to half the games here. That would free up the DH spot to rest some players. In particular I would like Vernon Wells and Aaron Hill to DH at least 10 times a year. EE would probably be better defensively here as most of his errors are throwing ones.
3rd base - offering EE arbitration, Bautista, or a free agent.
Bullpen - We will likely lose Fraser and Downs to free agency. They will both Type 'A' free agents as far as I know. Likely they will be picked up by teams as their 2nd type 'A' signing, with the Jays receiving supplemental round draft picks (similar to what we received for A.J. Burnett). Brian Tallet will probably be gone. These jobs will likely be filled internally. Who do you like for the Jays bullpen next year?
Closer - Do the Jays pick up the option for Gregg? If so, for one or 2 years? I'd take him for one more year. He will probably still bring a draft pick next year at this time and might even be type 'A'. It is also good to have a veteran around and someone who has experience closing.
5th starter - Unless Drabek is clearly superior to other options I'd like him to go to AAA. First for his development - he looks to me like he could still improve a bit with more time in the minors. In general, you won't harm a prospect by going a bit too slow but you can do harm by advancing him too rapidly. Secondly, if he stays in the minors until June then the Jays get one more year of service time. Shawn Hill has had a good year and looked good in September too.
Outfielders - What is our 'normal' outfield for 2011? Wells and Snider are locks for me. I think you offer Lewis arbitration but I'm not sure if he should be the starting outfielder or the 4th one. I prefer Bautista at third base. I'd like to see more range for the every day right fielder. Any thoughts?
Free Agents - A couple of free agents I think would be a fit for the Jays are Orlando Hudson (with Aaron Hill moving to third) and Coco Crisp (if the A's decline his $5.25 million option). Both would improve the Jays defense and add some speed to the lineup and I don't believe either of them are type 'A' free agents. Any other players you would like to see the Jays sign?
Predictions for 2011 are a bit difficult at this stage. But here they are anyway:
Playoffs - 20%
Contention in September - 30%
Same as this year - 25%
Worse than this year - 25%
If pressed, I would guess a win total of 91 for the Jays of 2011.
187 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cool Analysis
I agree with most of it but aren’t you forgetting about Yunel Escobar? He had a bad year in Atlanta and so far has rebounded to closer to his career norms, which are actually pretty good for his age. Unfortunately I think two of Buck, Encarnacion and Overbay has to be let go and replaced with already internal options or potentially free agent signings that won’t cost the Jays a pick to sign. I think Drabek should be looked at in the coming spring training of 2011 and see how he does, same with every other spot/5th starter this year because Triple A’s hitting environment isn’t very beneficial to a pitcher’s psyche. Good pitcher’s there have 4.00 era and getting hit around might hurt him in the long run.
Playoffs – 5%
Contention in September – 15%
Same as this year – 30%
Worse than this year – 50%
I’m being a bit pessimistic since we had career years from Buck, Gonzalez, huge year from Bautista and bounceback from Wells while having below-par years from Hill and Lind, even though they still hit a bunch of homers. Plus Cito is gone and with a new manager in place, the team could have a large coach turnover rate. You never know how things will go the first time round.
None of our top 4 pitchers sustained any long-lasting injury and were consistently good throughout the year, which should ahve been highly improbable given their age and experience. Just think of 2006 as things gone wrong and falling short.
I think they’ll have 81 wins next year.
Sorry for my long post
I think his position breakdown was more where we had questions going forward.
Since Yunel got here SS is no longer a question for next year
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
Yes, Yunel is a lock for next year. He can build a house at short if he wants…
I did forget about Jeremy Accardo however. I could see a scenario where he is with the Jays next year. The Jays still have one year of arbitration left with him. They will probably offer it to him rather that losing him for nothing. His trade value is also negligible right now I would think.
Jeremy’s option would be to play for the Jays or fail to report to spring training in his free agent year. He is guaranteed to be with the Jays unless he is released. The Jays have no options remaining so can’t send him to the minors. He could play out his year and then go wherever he wants as a free agent. Of course the Jays might be tired of the entire situation and just release him. It would have made more sense to do that during the year though.
I think it is more likely that Cito was preventing him from being called up this year than that AA was. It didn’t make sense to pay him $1 million if the plan was for him to play in the minors.
As for The Beatles, we have been much more cautious with our pitchers than in previous years. If that continues, they are a lot more likely to remain healthy. They don’t have a lot of injury history either. In the event of an injury we have better depth at starter than we did entering 2010. I don’t think we can make the playoffs if one of them is injured though.
by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 4, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
lol at
the beatles
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions
There's going to be so many questions answered over the off-season and spring training
My favourite are:
1) 5th starter – Looks like this could go anyway, love to see it go to Drabek as I simply don’t see Rzep as more than a 5th starter, so why not have all 5 guys being 3rd type starters. Possible candidates: Drabek, Rzep, Hill, Richmond, Stewart.
2) Bullpen – I see Rzep moving there and becoming a bit of a Tallet (spot starter/long relief) on top of that I see Gregg coming back but Downs and Frasor are completely up in the air, I wouldn’t be surprised either way. I could also see Stewart coming up into the bullpen. Possible bullpen arms: Rzep, Stewart, Purcey, Camp, Carlson, Roenicke, Lewis, Ray, Accardo (if he hasn’t burned every bridge already)
3) Rookies playing for spots – I’d like to see at least one of the following rookies competing and possibly earning a spot on the team next ST, Mastroianni, Thames, Hechavarria, Emaus, Stewart.
4) Utility Players carving out niches – There’s many players on this team that can play multiple positions and there’s so many combinations that I could really see anyone playing anywhere. Utility guys include Bautista (3B, RF), Lind (DH, 1B), Hill (2B, 3B), Emaus (2B, 3B), etc.
5) Re-signings – There are many guys who I’d be pleasantly surprised to find back in here come April, among them are Buck, Molina, Overbay, Frasor, Downs, Gregg and to be honest I’d not be surprised if any of these guys swung one way or the other.
I’d like to see John Buck and JPA with JPA getting some extra at bats either at DH or at first (if he can play there)
Here’s the problem with this plan: if they use JPA as a DH, they have to hope that Buck does not have an in-game injury. If JPA goes to play catcher, the Jays lose their DH and their pitchers would have to bat.
I feel very confident that will never present a problem
I mean even if we bring back Buck, then the amount of games they’d play in that formation with one being C and the other DH, then the likelihood of an in game injury is so minuscule that you take the already small chance and knock it down farther then you need to further knock it down because that would really only pose a problem in the earlier innings before you’d like to see the starter exit, or if he’s doing well enough you don’t want him exiting at all then you’re probably winning pretty soundly already so again no problem. Basically, don’t worry about it, we’ll be fine.
its one game
not gonna make a HUGE difference,
we probably won’t be in contention next year anyways (but i’d like to be wrong)
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Sticky situation at Catcher, you point out that JPA hasn’t had a lot of experience at the big league level behind the plate and that may be a sign to bring back Buck. Problem is if we bring back Buck he still won’t have a lot of experience.
While Im not trying to directly compare JPA to big name prospects such as Wieters and Santana it should be noted that they toiled in the minors until they were ready and then were given the starting job, and in either case it wasn’t out of spring training.
Should the Jays decide to go with JPA he would have all offseason and spring to get ready with the pitchers.
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
JPA has absolutely nothing left to prove at AAA
.986 OPS (yes, in the PCL, but still outstanding)
MLEs are .240/.291/.474 (compare to Buck’s .281/.314/.489) which would make JPA about league-average offense from the most (or second most, depending whom you ask) demanding defensive position. he’s well-regarded defensively and his power isn’t going anywhere (predicted 23 homers in a tad over 400 PAs, which is probably close to what he’d get in the Bigs. even his walk rate was solid last year (8.3%), and he isn’t turning 25 (still young) until January. if the Jays are serious about developing Arencibia (for trade value, as a 1B, as a starter, anything – which they should be) it’s time to make him an everyday player.
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
hope you're right
i know its a small sample
but arencibia looked terribly clueless at the plate for a while now
I REALLY hope this changes
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions
yes
i said i know
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions
How many guys looked clueless against the Cy Young candidates that JP hit against?
if we aren’t going to use the guys that looked bad against those pitchers, who are we going to use?
If Russell Martin is Non-Tendered I tink AA will be all over him.
JPA gets the nod out of Spring training and Russell ‘Can-Con’ Martin is a solid back-up. If JPA flames out Russell can step in with a his high OBS abilities and sound defense. Russ Martin has sound defensive ability right?
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 4, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Yup. He’s not a defensive specialist, but he’s solid enough. If Martin can avoid getting injured and they can get him at the bottom of his value, he’d be a nice pickup and a strong candidate for a bounce back year.
sign me up
I didn’t know Martin was a non-tender candidate. He can play some third too.
I think the number one thing I would like to see the Jays do is add a couple of hitters that can hit for a good average/have a good on base percentage. So I would dump Overbay and Encarnacion, add Hudson, like Tom suggested, since he’s popular in Toronto as well, and Adam Dunn, if he’s willing to come to Toronto after what J.P said lol.
If the Jays are going to serioesly contend for a playoff spot I think they’ll also need to add a top tier leadoff hitter, allstar type closer(Gregg isnt going to cut it for a playoff team, and certaintly not a world series team). How about Ichiro, and Soria? lol
Adam Dunn
I forgot about that. Here is the National Post article:
I don’t think we need more power though. I reckon he’s also a Type ‘A’ free agent, which means we’d have to give up our first round pick.
by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 4, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Also
Dunn can’t play D worth a lick so having him and Lind on the team is a bit redundant…both are bad LF, unproven/likely bad 1B, LH power hitters…
this is true
but any team would love to have a (nother) 138 OPS+, 3.9 WAR slugger.
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
Dear God!!!
No more home runs!!! The Jays need to hit for average to win ballgames! We tried slugging our way to a division and failed. The games were exciting, but in the end, we failed.
All this buttoning and unbuttoning
Adam Dunn
had a very good .356 OBA (and owns an excellent .381 career OBA). oh yeah, and more home runs > fewer home runs
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
You have to like Dunn's OBP that is for sure
But I personally want to see the Jays looking for more gap power. Hit the ball in the gaps and get rallies going. A middle of the order guy who takes a lot of walks is nice, but we can do better.
All this buttoning and unbuttoning
i don't understand the definition of gap power
isn’t it just hitting a lot of line drives, not at outfielders?
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
and why would you trade homers for doubles?
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
Doubles prolong innings, homers do not and yes I do realize that the Jays were near or at the top of doubles and homers.. It is especially evident when it comes to the Jays inefficiency at obp. Dunn would certainly help increasing obp but the Jays don’t need more homers.
Homers keep innings going just as long as a double…. as neither is an out…
And HR always scores runs, doubles do not
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
No problem, Thanks for setting me up for the easy comment
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
by JohnnyG on Oct 11, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
There's a reason
That every baseball statistic (traditional or advanced) values Homeruns more than doubles. I would take a guy with 50HR’s and zero doubles over a guy with 502Bs and no homers any day.
pretty funny comment actually
i guess since doubles are part of long"rally" innings it seems like they prolong innings. otherwise it makes no sense
by upstate jay fan on Oct 11, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
A gap hitter
That sounds exactly what Overbay was billed as when the Jays traded for him a few years ago. Now most Jays fans are ready to run him out of town…
2011 Jays
I could see there being a surprise move in the off-season to pick up a legit 3B prospect. My thought would be that the Jays might consider trading Lind and get a 3B prospect that is near ready for the Show…then either bring back Overbay or sign someone like Carlos Pena (power and great D) or Paul Konerko to play 1B?
Having 3B, SS filled for the future would be a huge improvement over where the Jays were a year ago at those 2 positions. 1B/DH/LF types aren’t too hard to come by in free agency
trading Lind makes no sense
his value is basically rock-bottom right now. he wasn’t even replacement level this year (-0.2 WAR this year, 3.5 last season) and you think we’ll get a legit 3B prospect for him? even if this is somehow Lind’s career potential (a very bad DH), his value isn’t getting any lower. the Jays have no one decisively better to stick at DH, so if they want to trade him, they need to give him another season or so to regain some trade value
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
I don’t think he has no trade value, he’s still young and only a year removed from a huge season…I’m not saying to dump him for nothing, but if AA can get someone of equal value to the team that can also play at an important defensive position I’d go for it.
but theres no way AA can get someone of equal value for Lind this off-season
unless the other GMs have completely lost their bonkers
or they can see into the future and find out that Lind becomes a perenial 50 HR slugger
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions
We had a legit 3B prospect
and he was near ready for the Show. But we threw him away. That was Bret Wallace.
You are correct...
Well, except for the fact that the Jays organization…and most scouts…and evidently the Houston Astros felt that he didn’t have the reflexes to play 3B, and as such he now plays first base.
Other than that though…bang on!
no need to be rude
but yeah, no one thought he could hold his own at 3B. he also did not perform even close to expectations in AAA, especially for a 1B. (small sample size alert) have you seen his ’Stros numbers?
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
Have you seen Wallace's family?
They all look exactly like him and they are all morbidly obese. Wallace’s weight will become a problem wait and see…
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 7, 2010 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions
offering EE arbitration
No way you offer EE arbitration. Not because he’s glaring awful, since he isn’t, but he’d get $5mil+ in arbitration, and there’s no way he’s worth that to the Jays. If you want EE back, you decline arbitration, and you offer him between 2-3 million to come back in a 1B/DH role, and if he signs, great.
In terms of Buck/Encarnacion/Overbay, personally, the guy I’d keep is Overbay. Left handed bat that draws a ton of walks, plays great defense, and has some pop. If you don’t make a move to get a big 1B bat, Overbay will likely provide good value for a small investment.
If you sign Buck, assuming his agent isn’t a moron, you’re looking at his contract being a three year deal, at a decent amount. If JPA is the real thing, you’ve overpaid for a backup catcher. If he isn’t, you’re then just hoping he doesn’t regress too much. I think there’s just too much risk there. I say, shake the man’s hand, let him cash in elsewhere, and if JPA can’t hack it, you get another cheap catcher on the market and see what D’Arnard/Perez/Jarolman do.
No way you offer EE arbitration. Not because he’s glaring awful, since he isn’t, but he’d get $5mil+ in arbitration, and there’s no way he’s worth that to the Jays.
Not far off maybe. According to FanGraphs, he accumulated 1.8WAR this season, which would be worth $7.2M on the free agent market.
Let someone else pay him that money. The Jays have enough defensive flexibility that they we’re going to invest $7.3mil on a player for next year, they should get a much higher return than a guy with a wild arm and some pop in his bat to plug into the field.
I wouldn't mind bringing him back
on a two-year deal at $3.5m per. I’d stick him at 1B.
He's not likely to hit well enough to stick at 1B
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
nope
he’s a decent enough bat to warrant a spot at 3B (or maybe DH if need be) but not 1B…
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
If his bat can't stick at 1B
there’s no way it sticks at DH.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
not talking about sticking, sorry
i meant as a stopgap till we sign someone/solve the 1B issue, if they choose to move Lind over for now.
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
If you want to be even remotely good, E5 isn't good enough
If you don’t care how good you are, Dopirak is cheaper.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
And Dopirak might surprise you and be an option going forward
if E5 surprises you, he takes it to the bank with another team.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
that’s a good point, though based on last year’s stats I’d much rather see Lubanski…
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
i dont think overbay could repeat this year's results
i’d rather bring back EE
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Kevin Gregg
I think the Jays will pick up his option
hopefully just 1 year
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Any chance of a bigger deal?
How about trying to land Kemp
I like how you think RogerbJR
With the situation in LA, they may be willing to trade kemp. As long as we dont have to give up Bautista, Snider, or Drabek I would love that. Should definitely try to get Soria from KC and consider signing Ordonez (for average) or Crawford (for everything!).
I would trade snider for kemp in a blue jay second.
Avi: Should I call you Bullet? Tooth?
Bullet Tooth Tony: You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.
by syc on Oct 5, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Why?
Kemp just turned 26, Snider is 22. If you compare Kemps career numbers up to the year he was 22 (his first 2 years) with Snider’s numbers up to this year, there isn’t much of a difference.
Kemp played in 150 games, and accumulated 477 PA with a .312/.346/.496 slash line (which is jacked partly due to a .411BABIP in 311 PA in 2007). Meanwhile, Snider has played in 183 games with 675 PA and a .255/.318/.446 slash line. Yes there is a difference, but not a whole lot of difference (Snider has actually been worth slightly more WAR over the same time frame).
In addition, Kemp is pretty much the worst defensive centre fielder in baseball, with a career -10.4 UZR/150 in the outfield, (including a league worst -24.3 UZR this year among all position players). He has also shown a decrease in speed this year 19SB/15CS) and I heard earlier in the year that he has shown a lack of focus as well.
I’m not sure that I see the advantage of trading Snider for Kemp because I think at worst, Snider will be at Kemp’s level in a couple of years – maybe even by next year. He is still going to break out and be a star for the Jays and I would much rather have some homegrown talent then some overrated celebrity from the Dodgers.
Kemp is an all star, snider is a bloggers wet dream. Not even to mention that Snider gets injured every year. Kemp is a proven player that can legit hit 30 HR and steal 20-30 bases. Yes kemp had a bad year but Travis hasent even had a good year yet.
I love the guy but he’s not ever going to be the player everyone wants him to be.
Avi: Should I call you Bullet? Tooth?
Bullet Tooth Tony: You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.
by syc on Oct 5, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Kemp is a good (not great) hitter
Nothing more than that. He’s never played in an all star game and he’s never hit 30 HR. It’s only a matter of time until he’s moved to a corner outfield spot – he’s one of the most overrated players in baseball right now. I think at worst, Snider becomes Kemp (minus the speed).
Besides, if Kemp is such a great all-star, why the hell would the Dodgers be considering trading him? He’s club controlled, relatively young and it’s not as if they have a gaggle of guys sitting around and waiting to replace him – considering they had guys like Garret Anderson and Scott Posednik play this year, their outfield depth isn’t the greatest.
by masterkembo on Oct 5, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
making statements like that about a 22 year old
Is just not understanding baseball. How you can think a 22 year old gets injured every season because he missed a couple of week is guessing at a lot of stuff not yet known. Point out ten 22 year olds that had a better season. This is like the folks the first month of this year that tough they could guess travis would never hit 275 in the majors because he wasn’t hitting much at that point. A guy that is an averager hitter in the majors at 22 is going to be a very good player.
by Tom Dakers on Oct 7, 2010 4:16 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
What difference does it make if a Jays player is 22 or 26?
Unless he is Canadian, we cannot hold him for more than five years anyway. If he is any good, he then goes free agent and we’re not even on his list.
Hill, Lind, Wells, and Rios would disagree
As a Toronto sports fan I proudly follow the lessons of lachrymology.
by Redonred on Oct 9, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
what about the rhianna factor?
does that help his WAR?
by upstate jay fan on Oct 11, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Catcher: Arencibia, with Molina as back up. Basically, I think it’s time to turn the page and give this guy the starting job. See what you’ve got. Take the picks that go along with Buck, and I don’t think there aren’t really any other viable affordable FA Catchers out there in my opinion. AAA backup Jeroloman.
1B: This one is interesting. I say let Lind play there. There are quite a few interesting FA 1B, but they won’t come cheap and may want a multi-year deal. Playing Lind at 1B opens up the DH for an older free agent slugger.
2B: Hill
SS: Escobar, with McDonald as backup
3B: The FA market is horrible at this position. Therefore, option B is to stick Bautista there. However, Bautista’s D is not much better than EE’s at 3B, and I like Bautista in RF. So I say take a chance with Encarnacion. It seems like every time he struggled this season, he went on the DL shortly afterward. Still, if you give him 600 AB’s this season, as opposed to the 330 he had, it would prorate his HR total to 38 HR’s. Not bad for a bad season eh. His OPS was also at .790, yet he didn’t get on base at his career rate. His D is not great, but it’s probably not as bad as we make it out to. I say give him a full season in Rogers Centre, and he might surprise.
LF: Snider
CF: Wells. I think he showed he can still get the job done out there this season. Not a gold glove, but an OK CF
RF: Bautista
DH: Delgado or Thome or Matsui. I like Delgado if he’s healthy.
1 Marcum
2 Romero
3 Morrow
4 Cecil
5 Drabek
Relief
CL Gregg
SU Frasor (accepts arbitration)
SU Purcey
SU Camp
MR Janssen
MR Rzepczynski
LR Richmond
AAA: Litsch, Stewart, Mills, Ray,
how about
get a OBP guy in RF, bring Bautista to 3B and let EE DH or vise versa
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions
thing is
this looks way too much like this year’s team
i know the playoffs are still year(s) away, but would we be able to win more games next year with a similar team as this years?
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 4, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions
ya, I know. I thought that too. But think about it...
Unless there are trades, there aren’t many changes to be made. Not many FA options at 3B, and EE’s numbers are a little surprising.
However, I think EE somewhat agrees with you, as in a recent MLB.com article, I read AA wants to balance the lineup more (maybe more OBP guys?). So I think we’ll see some significant changes.
im thinking (hoping) AA has a lot of trades up his sleeves
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
this year's team was young... and good
Isn’t it possible that another year of seasoning with a similar lineup, might put us in the hunt. Especially since the rays should be worse, and the yanks and Sox will be old.
by upstate jay fan on Oct 11, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
What happens if JPA gets injured or needs to go back down for an extended period of time? That would mean Molina is our starter and the invisible man is the back up.
Avi: Should I call you Bullet? Tooth?
Bullet Tooth Tony: You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.
by syc on Oct 5, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions
That wouldn’t be the end of world. We’re not contending next year and Molina is good at developing pitchers. Plus,with a decent amount of playing time, we can turn him into type B free agent
how do you know we are not contending next year? everyone thought we were losing 100 games this past season and we won 85
Avi: Should I call you Bullet? Tooth?
Bullet Tooth Tony: You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.
by syc on Oct 5, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m of the mind set we overacheived this year and 10 wins is still alot to make up in the AL East. I think we need to continue the rebuilding process at any expense, including sacrificing a one or two more years to play younger guys and build our system until. We can get a couple consistent years of high 80’s or one 90 win season. before we can call ourselves contenders. One season of 85 wins just doesn’t do it for me.
Not talking about wining the east we are talking about contending. If we got one more win each month this season we would have been at 92 wins. Take away Gregg's blown saves and we are contending.
I think you have to build off the success we had this year. No way AA and company are looking at this season and saying. “you know this year we over achieved, Im going to wait a few more years before we make a real run at it.” The pitching is ready, and we have a core of players under team control. How much more do we need?
Avi: Should I call you Bullet? Tooth?
Bullet Tooth Tony: You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.
by syc on Oct 5, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
to cherrypick
you can’t take away a closer’s blown saves because EVERY CLOSER BLOWS SAVES. MULTIPLE.
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
i doubt we can win much more than 85 next year
definetely not 90, unless we have as many career years from players as this year
Hill and Lind probably won’t be able to repeat 09 (they certainly won’t repeat 2010) ,
Buck’s gone and we dont know if JPA is the real deal or bust
debatable whether Wells could repeat this year’s numbers,
Bautista will fall back to Earth at least a little bit,
our starting rotation was almost always heathy except a few minor scratches here and there
we wont have downs and possibly frasor in the pen next year
gregg has been lucky with a lot of his saves
with these things in mind, i don’t know if we could
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions
if we could contend*
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
There are definitely players with downside. There is more upside though:
1. I read somewhere that our 5th starter position went 7-17. I’m not sure if that is correct, but intuitively it feels about right. It isn’t unreasonable to expect 5 more wins there. We will have a lot more depth at starter next year than we did starting this year.
2. Losing Brian Tallet should gain a couple of wins. Not necessarily meaning that our worst pitcher will pitch better than Tallet, but that the pitcher in Tallet’s role will pitch better.
3. Romero, Cecil, and Morrow still have upside. Even if they don’t pitch better, they will still likely give us more quality innings.
4. Hill, Lind and Snider all have upside in comparison to 2010. I think you missed Snider.
by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 5, 2010 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree that we have more players with upside looking into this year. Snider, Hill and Lind, a better fifth starter, and less dependency on Tallet. I also think we need to see what we have in both Bautista and Arencibia before breaking the bank. I think AA should always be looking for Gonzalez like trades that can make us younger/faster/and with better OBP, and maybe someone with good speed and OBP at any number of positions b/c Hill is flexible bw 2nd and 3rd and Bautista is flexible as well. I wouldn’t go to crazy this offseason till after we see a little bit more what we have. Who comes back and who declines. I think we should wait another year especially before giving up to much in prospects to go for it. I also think Cooper is going to have a breakout year, and I think Mastrionni has a good future and is the type of player the Jays need right now. I wouldn’t be too eager to change things up. Given the uncertainty going into next year I don’t even think EE at DH is a bad idea.
I think the Jays should be looking for an Ellsbury, Figgins, type player who might be cheap given an off year or a non-contending team in Figgins’ case.
Good call on JPA, I wouldn’t want the team to sign him to a big deal until 1 or two years in the majors unless he really does something special.
Bautista is going to be a tough/weird case all around. Hes under control for one more year so I imagine a 1 year deal is in the cards but depending on what happens he could be looking for a big big deal to set him up instead of a shorter term one.
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
i wouldn't worry about JPA
he’s still got at least 5 years of team control left before he’s a FA, seriously doubt AA is planning to extending him anytime soon
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
I wasn’t completely clear, but I meant I don’t think we should go for it and break the bank in terms of big free agent signings or trading major prospects until Bautista and Arencibia have proven themselves. If they decline or Arencibia flops then I think we should be another year or two away from spending to get the last couple of pieces.
Jeroloman
he’d probably be better than Molina
still pretty bad to have any of those guys get a major bulk of time at C
Avi: Should I call you Bullet? Tooth?
Bullet Tooth Tony: You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.
by syc on Oct 5, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
A new bat or two?
The Globe and Mail’s Robert Macleod has a good interview with Anthopoulos, with this tidbit:
Anthopoulos said the Blue Jays cannot be counted on to crank out as many home runs next season, so it is imperative they locate a new bat or two to add more balance to the attack.
Though the way it’s written, I’m not sure whether it’s Macleod or Anthopoulos saying the team needs a new bat or two.
Well to me since it says “it is imperative they” instead of “it is imperative we”, I think it’s McLeod saying that part.
Yeah, that’s probably right, though hard to tell, as reporters often do this to mix it up so that their stories are not too full of quotes. The end result becomes it’s hard to know for sure if they’re paraphrasing their interviewee or giving their own opinion.
If Jays wanna contend
It can’t be similar lineup with similar bullpens, cause I think the Jays were overachieving this year even though it seems like we dropped a bunch of silly games at unlucky times
Lets not worrying about contending for another year or two
It’s time to rebuild. One decent year of overachieving can make us lose sight of our long term objectives. I think they should acquire and play as many young guys as possible, with strong vetran leaders as backups.
One year of underachieving can apparently make you throw away multiple years of cost-controlled players
and bear in mind that it was a year in which the GM wasn’t even allowed to try to achieve.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
If you think you contend you can
You can start using them as trade bait too early. I’m saying get rid of anyone who can get us a type B or a prospect in a trade
I don’t think we completely over achieved. Lind and Hill who were the best Jays hitters in regressed sharply and were maybe the worst Jays hitters in 2010. Buck overachieved, and Bautista came out of nowhere. Vernon Wells was better but inconsistent. Alex Gonzalez overachieved and was turned over for Yunel Escobar.
1b- If Lind Get’s the job he should be better than Overbay this year. I would guess he’ll hit .280 with 25-30 Hr’s and bring his OBP up again.
2b- Hill had an awful year. His low Line drive rate and high pop up rate suggest he was trying to hit to much for power. His strikeouts remained low, and so I would guess he can return to hitting atleast .270 with 15-25 Hrs, a pretty big improvement relative to this year.
SS- Given the Jays lack of early in the order hitters, I think their offense will be improved with Escobar around for a full year, compared to the Gonzalez Escobar split this year.
3rd- I think EE showed some signs of improvement towards the end of the year at 3rd base, and project for almost 40 hrs over 600 ABS. that being said, the Jays have a lot of players with low OBP, high HR’s and will continue to probably in 2011 with Arencibia, Hill, Snider, and so I don’t think EE is the type of player Toronto needs right know. I would suggest that whoever ends up here will be atleast equal to this years 3rd baseman.
In the OF Bautista had an enormous year but I suspect he won’t regress too far hitting b/w 240 and 260 with 25-40Hrs and a High obp.
For Vernon Wells I would also assume a similar year. Maybe a slight regression (260 with 20-30 Hrs)
I would expect to see a huge improvement in Snider. In fact his numbers jump I would expect to replace Bautista’s regression. I expect Snider to hit .280 with 25-35 Hrs.
At Catcher it’s unlikely that Arencibia doesn’t have a pretty slow adjustment to the majors given his struggles in unfortunately limitted chances this year. I think he deserves the shot, and I would expect 15-20 HR power with a batting average b/w .230 and .250. I think that Lind/Hill’s improvement will more than make up for the jays regression at catcher. I also think room for improvement from Snider and at Ist base/Dh means that the Jays offense could be as potent next year as this.
I really think we need faster high OBP guys at 1 and 2 and 9 in the order. I really think the Jays should wait one more year be for topping up through the FA market. I’d like to see Mastrionni given a chance in the OF. He could be the kind of top of the order player they are looking for, or if Ellsbury is cheap after a poor year in Boston, I think he’d be worth a look. I would consider a high obp second baseman and moving Hill two third. But I also wouldn’t mind giving Emaus a chance at 3rd. If it’s recognized as a rebuilding year, it wouldn’t be bad to see what we have in the minors. All in all I think because of the flexibility of both Bautista and Hill (moving to third), I think we need to more hitters with high obp, one to go along with Escobar at the top of the order and one to round out the bottom.
I expect our starting five to be better next year. I think the battle b/w Rzep/Drabek/Hill/maybe Stewart will leave us far improved in the fifth spot compared to this year. Morrow shouldn’t have the slow start he had this year, and our young starters should have a little more built in arm strength to last later into the year. Rzep actually looked really good to me his last couple of starts.
I think the reason we weren’t in the race in september this year is their weren’t enough runners on base when we hit our home runs, and we did not have a dominating bullpen so I feel like we lost a lot of close and late games. It doesn’t matter who you send out when the game is over, but I think you need a strong bullpen to win the close games and I don’t think we were strong enough or consistent enough in that department.
Unfortunately we did not get to see much of Roenicke and have destroyed our relationship with Accardo, and are probably losing at least Downs. I think our Bullpen is a work in progress, and I wish we would have experimented more with Mills, and some of our minor league starters in the pen in seeing what we had for next year, especially knowing that we might lose quite a few of our current relievers. I think we should have a decent amount of strong arms between those who don’t make the rotation next spring.
I don’t think it makes sense to spend to much this offseason until we see what we have in the minors Mastrionni and possibly Emaus and in Drabek, Stewart and Rzep, Roenicke, etc. In the majors we need to see how Snider, Arencibia, produce in full years and if Bautista can produce again, and if Hill and Lind can rebound. I think theirs a good chance that between who we currently have we could have a pretty strong team, and I actually think we underemphasize the real weaknesses that the Yankees, Rays or Red Sox have in the lineup.
I expect us to be marginally better next year, and if we solve our weaknesses at the top of the order, and in the pen, I think we can compete. However i think it makes sense to stay in rebuild mode at the start of next year, and only trade to shore up the bullpen and the top of the order after we see what we have internally, and we recognize that we have a strong shot at the playoffs (say at the midway point of next season).
I really think the Jays should trade Marcum for a very very good hitting prospect
And start Drabek and Stewart in the rotation next year.
We could probably get a top prospect or 2 for Marcum, who has shown he can pitch in the hardest division in baseball consistently with an ERA of 3.50 – 4… theres not many pitchers in the league that could do that. Plus hes only 28 i believe…
Onions Baby Onions
Marcum alone for a very very good hitting prospect?
he could probbly fetch a good one, but not elite talent,
probably better to keep him, or package with leftover pitchers (i.e. Rzep or Mills or etc.) for elite prospect
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I think if you trade everyone who does well for prospects we will start to look more and more like the Pirates and Expos (RIP). It isn’t good for either the fan base or team morale. If you can’t sign him and he is heading into his free agent year that is different. At this point Marcum could be an asset for the Jays for the next 7+ years.
by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 5, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Then do we trade drabek or stewart?
cuz I think Stewart in the pen is kind of a waste
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 5, 2010 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Both of them could use more time in the minors. Starting your mlb career in the pen can be helpful too. It hasn’t hurt Phil Hughes for example.
by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 5, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
but look at Morrow
who’s to say Seattle wouldn’t have another ace to pair with Felix if he’d started in the rotation and stayed there?
Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!
They had another ace. His name was Cliff Lee. Problem was other than Ichiro their hitters couldn’t hit a pinata
Brandon Morrow was rushed to the majors. Morrow isn’t an ace yet, but hopefully he becomes one.
It is also important to have some depth at the starting pitcher position. Most teams use a lot more than 5 starters in a season.
by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 5, 2010 10:38 PM EDT reply actions
Offseason Moves
Trade to Kansas City: Drabek, Hechavarria and Arencibia for Greinke
Trade to San Diego: Zach Stewart, Anthony Gose and Travis D’Arnaud for Adrian Gonzalez
Trade the rest of the farm system to St. Louis for Colby Rasmus
Sign Cliff Lee to 6 yr-120 million dollars contract
Sign Carl Crawford to 5 yr-100 million dollar contract
Holy chrissakes
You’re joking right?
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 6, 2010 10:52 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Troll, troll, troll your boat...
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 6, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The Jays are ready to win now. Make these moves and we’ll be holding a championship. Forget the future
There’s no guarantee we’d win the AL East, let alone the championship, and we’d be the Pirates of the AL within a couple of years and stay that way for a long time.
No thanks.
Also, we’d be bidding against the Yankees for both Lee and Crawford. Again, it sounds like a great move in a baseball videogame, but in real life, it’s impossible even if the Jays were willing to do it.
It only works if you judge it by video game logic.
Video games hugely overvalue a player’s percieved skills and reputation, as opposed to his most recent numbers. So in a video game, Crawford is a beast who’s almost impossible to throw out stealing and Lee is nigh unhittable and will get your 22-30 wins.
It’s an old trick in the 2K- series of MLB games to go out and get a couple of top rating free agents you have no intention of keeping, package them for a good player you want, and dump the salaries with them. Then go and get a couple of guys who are past their prime in reality, but have a huge reputation/record, and plug them in to have an All-Star season. For example, in MLB 2K8, Frank Thomas hit .340 with 68HR for me. In 2K10, Carlos Delgado is hitting above .400 with 22HR as of May 5th in the season.
Most video games rate like a terrible fantasy team owner, giving guys they think are ‘clutch’ ridiculous numbers. Also why you generally want to avoid young prospects that in reality have high ceilings, because they just get murdered in the game.
i gotta say
nice job with delgado
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 6, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, he’s a beast in the game. The downside is that, thanks to the developer mentality, playing the Yankees or Red Sox is like smashing your own face with a hammer. Any mistake against them turns into a home run. I played a three game series against them and did not get Jeter out at the plate once; he went 14-14. It can get very frustrating.
Supposedly Yankees are willing to stand pat with their outfield
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
Theres no guarantee these prospects are going to turn into anything. WE GOTTA SELL THESE PROSPECTS AT PEAK VALUE!
How the heck are they at peak value???
please tell me how they are at peak value
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 6, 2010 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions
We gotta trade them before they struggle in the majors. WE HAVE NO TIME TO DEVELOP PLAYERS! WE GOTTA BE LIKE THE YANKEES WERE UNDER STEINBRENNER!
A) turn off the caps...it doesn't help your argument at all. Just makes you seem hysterical.
B) if a moderator says stop…stop.
C) telling people to piss off doesn’t help your argument either.
G'bye
Normally when someone wants to be banned so badly, I don’t do it, but in your case I am willing to make an exception.
Should have done it long ago....
I always think people will come around when they see how things work here.
Yankees under Steinbrenner
There’s a couple of problems with that (leaving aside the fact that only in the last 15 years under Steinbrenner were they any good and that’s only because he was suspended from operating the team day-to-day. Prior to that, the Yankees were a joke despite having the largest payroll.)
1. The Yankees have by far the most lucrative TV deal for any individual team in sports. This allows them to outbid anybody else for talent and buy out mistakes. Basically, even if the Jays want to get into a bidding war, they cannot win.
2 The Yankee are owned by a private individual. As such, they do not have to answer to investors who are seeking a return. Rogers investors would have a fit if they were asked to foot the bill it would cost for the Jays to compete with the Yankees dollar for dollar. If the Rogers investors did not have a fit, the Rogers customers would after their cable bill doubled or tripled.
The Yankees were good when Steinbrenner originally took over
ie. the Reggie Jackson years. And just because the Yankees have a larger budget than anyone else doesn’t mean they don’t have a budget.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
I gotta believe AA will make a lot of changes through trades...
I imagine he could sign and trade Frasor and Downs to lessen teams fear of losing draft picks and get major league (ready) pieces. I think he passes on Buck and goes with 2 of JPA, Jeroloman, R. Chavez unless Russell Martin is Non tendered then get him. EE is non-tendered and A. Hill moves over there.
This team needs to get on base more, get faster and AA’s biggest trade chips are J. Bautista and K. Drabek. We need to upgrade at 2B or 3B and at least one outfield position.
Can’t wait for the WS to end so AA can get to work….
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 6, 2010 11:32 AM EDT reply actions
We have $16M coming off the books that was going to players who weren't on the roster
Plus $16M that was going to players who are leaving as free agents (not even counting obvious non-tenders), plus $22M that we know the team was able to spend but chose not to, plus AA claims the payroll isn’t a hard cap. So, the Jays can absolutely afford to spend (competitively!) on big free agents, and I don’t know why AA is handcuffing himself by saying he won’t.
Anyways, my offseason plan was sign Crawford to play LF (moving Snider to RF, Bautista to 3B, NT E5) and Thome to DH (moving Lind to 1B), and generally stand pat on the pitching side, but then I realized that that would be wasting an opportunity to sign a second type A free agent for only a second round pick, so… maybe go after Rafael Soriano too?The other type A relievers don’t seem good enough to bother going after (ie. Guerrier) or young enough to keep it up (ie. Wagner, Rhodes).
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
why AA is handcuffing himself by saying he won’t
I think AA is taking a page from the Gillick playbook and not taking the high priced free agent route until he feels the foundation of the team is ready to win. Despite the success this year, this team is awfully young in a lot of areas. We still haven’t had a full season of Snider, we have no idea what JPA will do, we don’t know what we will get from the Jedi, we don’t have a manager, and it’s entirely likely at least one of this year’s starters will have a down year next year. To me, all of this needs at least one more year to mature. I’m not saying we should not try to win, but I think we need to spend a year figuring out exactly what we do have.
I think you’re exactly right. I think at the end of next year we’ll have seen some more of Drabek, Snider, Bautista, Arencibia as well as have given Hill and Lind a chance to rebound. I am quite hopeful about Snider having a breakthrough year, Drabek being solid and Hill and Lind Rebounding. I think Arencibia is a bit more of a toss up, but he sure improved leaps and bounds last year and he’s worth giving a good solid chance to start in the bigs. I think between better years from Snider, Hill, Lind and Drabek we should be moderately better next year, and maybe we breakthrough in the first half, but then we can spend at the all star break. But I don’t think we spend until we know.
I think we should look into low price high risk players in areas where we don’t have immediate options. Bring back Delgado and EE to fight it out for DH for instance. I also think a good OBP guy at a low price is not a bad idea.
If you're so sure Hill and Lind are going to rebound
then why do you want to waste their rebound year by not surrounding them with a competitive team?
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
because other guys are going to regress
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 7, 2010 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions
On every team you're going to have players that play below their talent level
and players that play above it.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
We already spent a year figuring out what we have in a bunch of these players.
And given the fact that you’re not accepting Bautista’s breakout year, a single year apparently doesn’t actually tell you what you have in a player, so what’s the point in spending a year getting that info?
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
okay
we’ll accept Bautista’s breakout year.
Since there’s no point in getting another year to look at what we have in him, lets sign him to a huge multi-year deal.
sound good?
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 7, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Bautista doesn't have to hti 50 home runs
(or even 40) to be someone I’d want on my team… at third base. He’s always had a good walk rate.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
what do you want me to say?
here, tell me
I’ll say it just so you can be happy that someone agrees with you
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
There’s plenty of reasons to be cautious about the Jedi’s year:
1) He’s had an unprecedented year. No one as late in his career has made such a gigantic leap in power. Is this increase in power sustainable over multiple years?
2) He will have a new manager and may have a new hitting coach. Given that Jedi credits so much of his improvement to Cito Gaston and Dwayne Murphy, even if his mechanics don’t change, this might affect his confidence.
3) Players begin to decline in physical abilities in their 30s. Jedi will be 31 next year. Given how much his swing is based on timing, pitch recognition, and reflexes, Jedi’s ability to turn on an inside fastball could go away quickly
4) Opponent will adjust even more next year. We saw in September more and more often the Jose gets a steady diet of junk. That trend will continue next year.
I think the Jedi will hit 35-40 HR next year followed by further declines every year. I think he will be valuable as a hitter for about 4-5 years with his ability to take a walk managing to keep him in the game for that long.
remember how Crawford doesn't like to play on artificial turf?
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 7, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Link to where he said that please?
And our turf is different from theirs.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
"No players should have to play on turf," - Crawford
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/sports/baseball/13crawford.html
another one
"It’d be nice to play on grass," Crawford acknowledged. "Turf is hard to play on. But I take good care of my body on the turf. I have to go the extra mile to get ready to play. Compared to turf, (on grass) your body feels like you’re playing on a mattress."
happy now?
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/carl-crawford-enjoying-the-ride-while-it-lasts-090810
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Jordan Bastian article
Here’s a good Jordan Bastian MLB article running through all the players currently in the fold and what may be in store for them in the off-season / next year.
This is a great thread!
Let’s keep it going till April!
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 7, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions
Since people seem to accept win numbers in stuff like UZR, how about this argument?
The Jays were only 1.4 fWAR behind the Rays this year. Go to Fangraphs and add up the pitching and batting numbers if you don’t believe me. Rays: 43.5; Jays: 42.1. The funny thing is, the Red Sox had 48.5, ahead of even the Yankees’ 47.5. And that’s with those teams actually trying to be good, and us just plodding along. Do you think Aaron Hill will play like he did in 2009? That’s 3 more wins. Do you think Adam Lind will hit like he did in 2009? That’s almost 4 more wins. Do you think Brian Tallet’s place will be taken by a replacement level player? That’s a win and a half. Look, we’re better than the “big three” and we didn’t add anybody yet. So I don’t get why people think we’re only good enough to see what other teams will have when they sign it away from us at the end of the year. We’re not as far away as you think.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
i don't think there's a point to rush for contention
i mean, we want to win,
but theres no point in burning money on free agents if the only reason to do it is that we ‘think’ we’re close
it would be a nice surprise if 2011 turns out to be a contending year,
but realistically, 2012 would be when things come together imo
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 7, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions
In 2012 we lose Bautista and gain one of Drabek and Stewart
I don’t see why that makes the 2012 team so much better than the 2011 team that we have to wait to spend money, especially when there are guys available now that fill our current holes better than anyone after 2011 is likely to, and anyone we sign for 2011 is probably still going to be here in 2012.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
Our starting rotation, other than marcum, will be at their peak years (assuming it stays the same)
and Hech will probably be up, and unless something really mindblowingly bad happens, our infield (assuming we have a decent 1B and Hill moves to 3B or we get one from outside) will arguably be the best infield in MLB.
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I feel like you're counting your chickens before they hatch
expecting Hechavarria to be up by 2012, or assuming he will take Escobar’s job even if he is major-league ready. Even with no fifth starter to speak of our rotation had a better FIP than the Rays and Yankees. Waiting a year doesn’t so much make our rotation better as it does waste a year of our rotation already being good enough.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
But you can’t just say the Hill and Lind will automatically improve to their 2009 numbers and Tallet will be replaced and we automatically gain all these wins.
Even if the above happen, you can guarantee that there will be some players in 2011 who will not perform as well as they did in 2010 either through just having a bad year or suffering an injury. Those declines could easily wipe out the gains you make from Hill, Lind, and replacement Tallet.
I do think that the fWAR numbers show that the Jays are a lot closer than we thought at the beginning of the year. They might be good enough to hang in the pennant race for most of the year next year, but I don’t think we are quite ready to do the major free agent thing yet.
You also can't say that nobody will have a breakout season next year
In fact, I can guarantee that someone will. I have no idea who, but on a 25 man roster someone will have a season better than you’d expect. My point isn’t that we’re already good enough to compete, it’s that we’re not so far away as people seem to think, and we have plenty of money to make up the difference with all the contracts that are coming off the books (not to mention that we were already $20M below our high water mark). Instead of crying that the sky is falling, let’s apply a little rigor. Don’t think Bautista will repeat his year? Fine, tell me what numbers you think he’ll put up, and we can calculate what his value will be. Let’s repeat that for the whole team, and then we’ll know how good we are, which means we’ll know how much we need to—and can—improve.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
We have significant question marks going in to next year which makes spending risky
Lind and Hill (will they return to form), Bautista (how much will he decline), Snider (when Snider will breakout), Arencibia (is he ready), Wells (is he going to continue to produce). Given that there are serious question marks pertaining not to the edges of the Jays order, but the very heart of it, I think it’s best to wait until after next year to spend. If some of these questions sort themselves out by midseason and were in a race, spend then, but right now we should be looking for trades that make us competitive in the long over short run (like the Gonzalez trade). I do think we should go for it soon while the starting rotation is together, but I prefer to wait till next year to plug in our better defined holes through free agency. I think minor pickups in positions where we don’t have any options should be considered, but it is not time to spend.
I feel like these exact same questions will still exist next year regardless of what happens in 2011
except for Bautista because he’ll be a free agent. If Arencibia breaks out, we’ll ask if he’s going to have a sophomore slump. If he doesn’t, we’ll ask if this is the year he puts it together, or if he ever will. Same thing with Snider. If Hill and Lind rebound, we’ll wonder if they’re only good every other year; if they don’t, we’ll wonder if they ever will.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
its okay
you can have your own opinion
just don’t expect a lot of people to agree with you
feel better now?
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Appeal to Ridicule is not an argument.
Your claim seems to be “We suck, but prospects will save us.” Well, I’ve made my claim that we don’t actually suck. Do you have contradicting numbers that support your claim that we will suck, and numbers that you think our prospects will put up in 2012 that justify your claim that they will save us?
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
okay then
you’re right, im wrong. We should acquire all the high class free agents this offseason in order to compete next year,
But there’s no way AA does that. At least, in my mind.
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Tweeted by Jon Morosi:
Carl Crawford on whether he might be back with the #Rays next year: “You always keep that little ounce of hope.” (link)
So much for him wanting to be off turf.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
Does anyone really WANT to play on turf?
That turf in the Trop is disgusting.
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 8, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
fixed:
the Trop is disguting
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Whats he going to say?
No get me the hell out of here!!
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
definetely yo
he’s so gangsta that crawford
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions
He could have said "no comment"
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
Thats the same as no in that instance.
And you know very well that people don’t say that.
If they do come out and say they want to leave its usually done in the offseason when shit hits the fan and they are asking for a trade. See Edmonton Oilers for some good examples lately.
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
Cito's 2011 Batting Order
CF Dewayne Wise
SS Yunel Escobar
RF Adam Lind
1B John Buck
3B Kevin Millar
2B John McDonald
LF Mike McCoy
C Jose Molina
DH Travis Snider
snider DH?
are you kidding me?
he belongs on the bench
To Infinity. And BEYOND!!!
by YunelTheLazyLatino on Oct 8, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions
The Jays have no money...
Just kidding.
Actually, the Jays are just a very small cog in the very large money-making machine, Rogers Communications. In 2009, from its internet, cable TV, telephone and wireless operations only, Rogers sales exceeded $11 billion which yielded a gross profit (before taxes) of $4.09 billion.
Having mentioned that, I’ve never believed that anything more than fleeting MLB success can be achieved by being active in the free agent market. But it is important to hold on to what you’ve got, if they’re productive or “plus” players like Bautista, Buck, Downs, Gregg and perhaps a few others. At least until they can be replaced from within the organization with players of similar effectiveness.
Along these lines, J.P. Arencibia’s situation obliges the Jays’ front office to make a decision on John Buck’s future with the team. The best move might be to offer Buck a four-for-two deal, with a team option for five. (Keep Molina, too.) If JPA comes on strong, Jays can always move Buck. So what if the team has to eat part of his contract somewhere along the line. That wouldn’t be the end of the world.
Not too eager to keep Molina
A defense-first catcher with bad defense isn’t a valuable piece.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
How does this look?
1. C. Rasmus CF (L)
2. Y. Escobar SS
3. A. Lind 1B/DH (L)
4. J. Bautista 3B/RF
5. T. Snider LF (L)
6. V. Wells RF/DH
7. A. Hill 2B
8. JPA C / R. Martin C
9. B. Emaus DH/3B/2B
SP R. Romero (L), B. Morrow®, B. Cecil (L), S. Hill , K. Drabek
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 15, 2010 8:07 PM EDT reply actions
I like I like
I would switch Lind and Snider personally, and am wondering what happened to Marcum, otherwise it is all good.
There She Gooooooes!
by Rugged Rock on Oct 16, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Yup along with Zach Stewart
Even a mistake may turn out to be the one thing necessary to a worthwhile achievement
by TonyFernandezSavedMyLife on Oct 17, 2010 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions























