Jays Trade for Dana Eveland
Here is the press release:
The TORONTO BLUE JAYS have acquired LHP DANA EVELAND from the Oakland Athletics in exchange for a player to be named later or cash considerations.
EVELAND, 26, appeared in 13 games last season for the Athletics making nine starts and posted a 2-4 record with a 7.16 ERA. The 6-1, 220 lb. left-handed pitcher was originally drafted by the Milwaukee Brewers in the 16th round of the 2002 First Year Player Draft. In parts of five seasons with Milwaukee (2005 & 2006), Arizona (2007) and Oakland (2008 & 2009) the Palmdale, California resident has posted a 13-17 record with one save and a 5.54 ERA in 83 games, 44 starts.
Tom: I don't really understand it, but we want to collect all the pitchers we can get. Here is his career numbers. He had a decent season in 2008. I think our 40 man roster is full so someone will have to be dropped or perhaps Dirk Hayhurst will be put on the 60 day DL. Eveland is out of options, so he can't be sent down unless he clear waivers.
Hugo: I'm snowed in and just got power back, so just found out about this move now. I actually like it quite a bit, as depth moves go. I think it's funny that people here seem to like the pickup of someone like Valdez (or at least think he should/will make the team), a guy with one pitch he can't control at all, but are turning up their noses at a 26-year old lefty starter who has actually shown he can be an effective pitcher. Eveland is still pretty young and while his 2009 was a complete mess, he's only a year removed from a very solid season in 2008. His strengths are keeping the ball on the ground and in the park.
While he obviously struggled mightily in 2009, (although he only made 9 starts) I wouldn't expect another BABIP anywhere near the .390s, so he should bounce back some just on that. He also was hurt by an abnormally low strand rate (63%). His FIP for 2009 was 5.05 (4.09 in 2008 over 29 starts, btw), not fantastic by any means but not nearly as bad as his ERA would suggest and about average for a 5th starter.
I'm not necessarily clamoring for him to make the rotation out of spring training, (though as Tom said, I doubt he would pass through waivers), but it's good to have an option of someone with experience but who still has some potential and upside. If there are injuries or ineffectiveness in some of our young pitchers, he's a much better option to fill in than we had last season in someone like Mike Maroth. And maybe a fresh start in Toronto will help him get his career back on track.
By the way, Jordan Bastian tweeterates that Eveland will come into camp with a shot at a starting job with the Jays.
0 recs |
27 comments
|
Comments
Out on a limb ...
Probably just another arm to compete for a job in the spring. I would think (and I could be wrong) that the PTBNL/cash component won’t be decided until after spring training, and will depend on whether or not he makes the team and/or whether or not he clears waivers.
Fwiw Eveland is a high GB pitcher, which might work well even despite lower K #‘s if he didn’t walk so many batters. Wonder if his stuff might play a little better in the bullpen …
holy shoot (hi hugo's mom)
how many pitchers do we need? I’m getting tired of rationalizing all these moves.
I'm figuring Dirk will go on the 40 man.
We still need a roster spot for a catcher. I really don’t understand, we have a ton of pitchers and no right fielder and we keep picking up more pitchers.
hmmm...
Cito and AA seem content in having Bautista as a starter in RF and leading off.
/sigh
by Civilizedworm on Feb 6, 2010 5:39 PM EST up reply actions
well ..
- - just b/c they can’t find a fit doesn’t mean they are content
- - it’s a rebuilding year, who cares? Heck, put Travis Snider up there and maximize his AB when he’s playing. I’m only half kidding.
In all honesty I would really like to see this, though I don’t expect it would EVER happen:
Snider (LF) – b/c he kicks off L/R theme and b/c you want to get him ab
Wells (CF) – b/c you want to get him as many fastballs as possible, hence you need him in front of Lind
Lind (DH) – b/c he’s your best hitter
Hill (2b) – b/c he’s the only guy who has a chance to offer any protection to Lind
Overbay (1b) – keeps L/R theme, and does offer Hill some protection
Encarnacion (3b) – from here on out I don’t really care to be honest, they all suck to varying degrees
Buck ©
Bautista (RF)
Gonzalez (SS)
overbay should bat higher in the lineup against righties
so that you better leverage his high obp. maybe swap him with vernon.
"Look at me! I'm Tomokazu Ohka of the Montreal Expos!"
well ..
I kind of agree, but 3 LH in a row would be tough to get away with and as I said, I really really like Wells hitting in front of Lind to potentially see more fastballs. If you’re ignoring speed Overbay at leadoff and Snider behind Hill is an option, but if my scenario is unlikely than the chances Cito hits Overbay leadoff is next to impossible. He’s not that kind of manager.
That lineup begs to ask the question why do the Jays place such a low emphasis on players that can run. I don’t see anyone who can steal double digit bases in that lineup, maybe Vernon on a good year. I like the thought of your lineup, with staggering lefties and righties, but Snider is not a leadoff hitter and Vernon is the anti #2 hitter, more often than not, Lind will come up with 2 out and no one on.
- - b/c it actually is overrated unless you can steal at a high %
- - Wells stole 17 last year, that’s easily into double digits (and actually not bad for a guy who rarely ever gets on first base)
As for your comments on the lineup, I agree re: Snider and Wells but the point is we don’t really have anyone perfect for those roles. I kind of like Overbay as a #2, but that likely means Hill at #3 and nobody protecting Lind and that’s a really bad plan. Sometimes building your lineup is about putting your best hitters where they fit best, and filling in the holes around them as best you can. That’s basically what I was doing … Wells in front of Lind is good (IMO), Hill behind him is ideal, Overbay protecting Hill is also good. Heck you could argue that dropping Snider below EE and moving everyone else up a slot is our absolute best lineup. But I just sort of figured that getting Snider more experience helps.
Doesn’t this fill the spot vacated by Bocock? Counting…
no…that’s 41.
If I was deciding it would be Henn who was DFA’d
I am guessing that Dirk goes on the 60 day DL....
but then someone would have to be released for a catcher, but that doesn’t have to happen until the start of the season.
too early
No DL in the off=season. Can’t carry the extra guy until you get to that point.
can you DFA someone for the two weeks then put him back on the roster??
that would get us to spring training?
I don't think so
I think after you DFA someone, you only have 10 days to trade them, release them outright, or put them through waivers
"Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our closed rooms... The game of ball is glorious." - Walt Whitman
Dirk could be DFAed and assigned to the minors
I doubt anyone would take him off waivers when he can’t pitch for 4 to 6 months
Oh boy
Another reject. What was the point of this? Cito and Brucie aren’t exactly La Russa & Duncan.
HEADING STRAIGHT FOR THEM, I PRESS DOWN MAH GUNS!
by BenjiDoc on Feb 6, 2010 4:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Reclaimation Project
Eveland has the raw stuff to be a good pitcher, but he’s never even come close to putting it together. Real control issues, although has had some really nice stints in the minors, and in 2008, looked on the verge of establishing himself. There was a rumour that he was trying to pitch through a minor injury last year right before being called up, which is why he was so awful.
Really, this is a Josh Towers kind of guy right now, with the potential to go further. Considering he isn’t going to cost much of anything, it’s worth seeing what he does in the spring. Could establish himself as a solid end of rotation starter if he can get his control locked in.
Eveland is a headcase
His confidence snowballs once he gets in trouble. He had control issues, they changed his delivery and his velocity went down. He blamed it on vision problems,delayed his lasik surgery till the offseason instead. Struggled, then got passed up. Though ive seen worse 5th starters before, taking a risk. If he sucks, just DFA him again since he’s out of milb options.
Dana Eveland Anagrams
Anal Van Deed
Lava And Need
A Landed Vane
Ohhh Brett...One more year! One more year! One more year!
Superbowl Prediction - Colts 41 Saints 23
by craig in calgary on Feb 6, 2010 7:41 PM EST reply actions
I think the reason why the Jays are loading up on SP
Is that the SP tend to get overworked and end up getting injured so management is just acquiring some back up in case it happens again this year

by 

















