Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Strikeforce: Cormier vs. Barnett Fight Video Highlights

Could we have actually still be in the Wild Card race?

I decided to take a look at the WAR and RAR numbers if we still had Halladay. Therefore I subtract these values off the cumulative fifth starters - Scrabble, Eveland, Litsch, Tallet, Mills, and Hill.

Roy Halladay
Pitching WAR: 6.8
Pitching RAR: 66
Offense WAR: -0.3
Offense RAR: -3
Total WAR: 6.5
Total RAR: 63

Marc Rzepczynski
WAR: -0.3
RAR: -2

Dana Eveland
WAR: -0.2
RAR: -3

Jesse Litsch
WAR: -0.1
RAR: -1

Brian Tallet
WAR: -1.0
RAR: -12

Brad Mills
WAR: 0.0
RAR: 0

Shawn Hill
WAR: 0.0
RAR: 0

We would have got about 8.4 wins and 81 runs more if we still had Halladay and therefore didn't have to use these pitchers this season. That would put us 7 games back of the Yankees for the AL East, and 5.5 back of the Wild Card Rays.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No

It would just be another season of almost. Good job by AA starting the rebuild and now if we can clean out our bullpen and Buck to get more draft picks in good draft. None these A and B type free agents are core players and we can use the draft picks in a few years.
btw long time reader first time poster…great site

by lambo on Sep 23, 2010 8:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Not saying we shouldn’t have made the trade, just posting some numbers out

by adiderek on Sep 23, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

No

The problem I see with trying to statistically calculate how many wins the Jays would have if Halladay had been on the team this year is that is more to the game (and life) than just numbers. For instance, I’ve read a number of times over the course of this season, including yet again just recently, pitchers tactfully saying how great Halladay was, but that his leaving was a good thing for the young guys as gave them space to be loose and gel together as a group. So one or more the young pitchers may have fared worse this year under that scenario. Halladay staying totally changes the dynamic of the team this year and not necessarily for the better, as this needed to be a year to rebuild and bring up young guys.

by jabalong on Sep 23, 2010 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

No disrespect to the original question or anything, but just read something related that made me laugh. In his new Mail Bag in the Star, someone asked Richard Griffin for his view on the best new baseball stat(s), to which he replied:

As for stats that I prefer, fans of the mailbag know how much I am a fan of something called "wins" for starting pitchers. For those that aren’t aware, that’s when you start a game and pitch five or more innings, leave with the lead and your team hangs on to win. If pitchers put enough of these together for the same team, maybe 95-100, then that gives you a chance to play in October and maybe win a fluttery thing called a pennant that they present at the end of the year and flies high over your ballpark the next year…

by jabalong on Sep 23, 2010 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

What a moron.

Onions Baby Onions

by ohmybosh on Sep 23, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry

Old fashion ball fan here. I love this post! I won’t put down the people who like the new statistics, but it’s not nice to say those of us who still like the old ones are morons.

All this buttoning and unbuttoning

by Marttisdad on Sep 24, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Felix Hernandez is a .500 pitcher this season.

Except arguably he is the best pitcher in the AL

Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...

by JohnnyG on Sep 24, 2010 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ha ha, I got a good chuckle out of it too. Personally, I have nothing against trying to mine new kinds of statistics, but it all gets a bit too much at times and the traditionalist tries to keep it simple. Anyway, it’s all good – part of what makes baseball fun. Griffin was just needling the propeller heads a bit.

by jabalong on Sep 24, 2010 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

We would have got about 8.4 wins and 81 runs more if we still had Halladay and therefore didn’t have to use these pitchers this season.

Or our big four of Marcum, Romero, Cecil and Marrow might not have stepped up and turned in the kind of performances they have with the presence of Halladay helming the rotation.

What Ifs are fun but they are a long way from fact. There’s so many factors that you can’t just swap guys in and out and declare what would have been authoritatively. That being said, I doubt there’s anyone who wouldn’t have kept Halladay as a Blue Jay if it had been at all possible.

by dexfarkin on Sep 23, 2010 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

I liked Halladay and appreciated his time with him, but looking back I wouldn’t have kept even if had a choice. I really think his leaving has helped create an environment in which our young starters can gel as a group and find their MLB footing – several of them have said as much. And I’m really pumped about getting Drabek (D’Arnaud and Gose could be significant down the road too) – and that’s part of renewing your team, getting good return for your older players while you can. So I can’t say I was “happy” to see Halladay go, but it was the right decision for the right time and I wouldn’t change it even if I could.

by jabalong on Sep 24, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

2 Things

I don’t get how keeping a Pitcher would have let us score 88 more runs…

Secondly, we also must take Halladay’s 2010 stats with a grain of salt, ie pitching against pitchers and a far easier schedual in the NL East.

Though, I do believe Doc is the best pitcher in all of baseball. Don’t be hating.

There She Gooooooes!

by Rugged Rock on Sep 23, 2010 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Tallet, Scrabble, Litsch, etc. gave up 88 more runs than Doc?

by adiderek on Sep 23, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Keeping a pitcher wouldn’t have let us score more than 80 runs. RAR, and WAR are based off of the principle that a run scored, is a run allowed – they are worth equal amounts and most years, approximately 10 runs above a replacement level player (scored or saved) is worth one win above replacement. Halladay would have saved 81 RAR compared to our fifth starters this year, which is worth approximately 8.4 wins (above replacement level – I think a ‘replacement level’ team is worth 48 wins a season).

As for the second point, Halladay’s WAR last season was over 7 and he’s at 6.8 this year, so I’m not too sure about the ‘grain of salt’ since he might actually be worth less this year than last.
If you read the WAR primer over at fangraphs, it explains that some of those factors are actually considered in the calculation (i.e., park factors and run environment). WAR is based off of FIP – the league average FIP is regressed to the league average ERA every season so it actually takes into account the league played in as well.

by masterkembo on Sep 23, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I should add that the RAR/WAR values aren’t literally what a player provides, but are an indication of what a player is worth.

by masterkembo on Sep 23, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

not to nitpick

but a run prevented is actually slightly better than a run saved — a ridiculous but explanatory example: Over the course of 162 games, Team A scores 332 runs and gives up 162. Team B scores 162 runs and gives up zero. Although the team’s have the same run differential, Team B will be undefeated whereas Team A will just be extremely good.

"Look at me! I'm Tomokazu Ohka of the Montreal Expos!"

by jessef on Sep 26, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wouldn’t that work the other way as well?

Team A Scores 162 and Gives up 324 Runs = -162 Run Differential
Team B Scores 0 and Gives up 162 Runs = -162 Run Differential

In this situation Team B is going to lose everygame whereas Team A will probably just be really bad, but it demonstrates that a run scored is worth more then a run saved.

We had this discussion in a fan post awhile back and it was very interesting, some people on both sides but ultimately shouldn’t they be equal?

Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...

by JohnnyG on Sep 26, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, you're correct in that

but i think we’re assuming that the team in question has a positive run-differential, otherwise there’s no chance they’d be making the playoffs, anyway.

"Look at me! I'm Tomokazu Ohka of the Montreal Expos!"

by jessef on Sep 26, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

A reasonable assumption I suppose.

Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...

by JohnnyG on Sep 26, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice thought,

But it has to be said that its doubtful that Halladay keeps up the same numbers pitching in the AL East that he put up in the National League.

Yes we would be better, still not sure it would have been good enough.

Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...

by JohnnyG on Sep 23, 2010 5:44 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah and what if....

we had never let Rios go last year either! we could be fighting for the pennant!
But… then Jedi never gets a chamnce to play last sept. and maybe he doesn’t gain the confidence that has allowed him to have the year he has.

In 2011 or 2012, when drabek is part of an AL east contender, we won’t be worrying about 8 more wins in 2010.

by upstate jay fan on Sep 24, 2010 12:17 PM EDT reply actions  

You mean we’re trading Drabek in 2011 or 2012? ;-)

by CuseJay on Sep 24, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

rude,

Prehistoric Hoops - We're back! And we have a real domain!

by boo15749 on Sep 27, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade Drabek Now! While his stock is high

by Asham on Oct 4, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about our heroic azure-tinged corvidae, the Toronto Blue Jays.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hal2_small
Quantifying the Effect of Team Defense on Over/Underperforming the Team's FIP
Small
Brett Lawrie's historic defensive prowess

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blue Jays Player Stats Multiplied by 4
Small
Petition to change Suckage Award Titles
Jaysfanimage_small
The Lansing 4: What to do when they outpitch expectations?
Misc_003_small
Jays' All-Star Alliterative Name Team
Kingkelly_small
Stats tools?
Small
Jays Future Closer?
N41306733_31278203_7401_steve_golfin_small
my MLB power ranking, May Edition
Jaysfanimage_small
Blue Jays Farm Report - Apr 29-May 5

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Bluejayperched_small hugo

Rincewind-1_small Tom Dakers

Assistant Manager

Smith_up_small JohnnyG

Authors

Hiro_small jessef

Profile_small masterkembo

Profiel_small Woodman663

Minorleaguer_small Minor Leaguer

Tony_fernandez_small TonyFernandezSavedMyLife

Moderators

J_bau_small jays182

Aejfuulciaar18g_small Bowling_Guy25