Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Aston Whiteside

Joe Nathan?

The Twins declined Joe Nathan's $12.5 million option and he has said he would like to be a closer, not a setup man. Do you think the Jays should go after him?

The Twins are interested in keeping him, just not at $12.5 million, which I can understand. He isn't an A or B type reliever, coming off Tommy John surgery in 2010. He had a bit of an up and down year but held batters to a .207/263/.391 line in the second half of the year, with 5 walks and 22 strikeouts in 23 innings.

I'm not sure how big a contract he is expecting, maybe just a year and an option. If he has a good season he could be an Type A or B free agent next year, we could end up with draft pick. 

The downside is that he turns 37 next month and we can't be sure he'll be the pitcher he has been in the past. We might sign him and have him turn out to have a season like Jon Rauch's 2010. 

Poll
Should the Jays sign Joe Nathan?
Yes
375 votes
No
295 votes

670 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 71 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It all depends on the price

For $2-4MM I think he could be a good/great one year addition for the team. Anything more and the risk is a little too high.

Can't wait for some October Baseball.
@VagabondBansal

by Vagabond13 on Oct 26, 2011 3:23 PM EDT reply actions  

no way he signs for $4M

he was worth 12 WAR over 6 seasons from 2005-2011. I’d be happy with a 5-6M deal, maybe with a team option (though I don’t know if he’d do that either)

by benk on Oct 26, 2011 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

things changed since 2005...

Nathan’s worth will be decide by the length of the line of suitors, the depth of their wallets, and the look of desperation in their eyes, and NOT by accumulated WAR.

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Oct 27, 2011 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Vagabond has identified the exact problem with this poll

Should the Jays sign Joe Nathan for $1? Absolutely. it would be idiotic to not do so. Should the Jays sign Joe Nathan for $20 million? It would be idiotic to do so.

Now, if the poll had been “Should the Jays sign Joe Nathan for $8 million for next season?”, how many of you would say yes?

by siggian on Oct 27, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, I want to interview this guy!

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 26, 2011 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I wanna see Joe's birth certificate.

In honor of the Jays 2nd Baseman who played with fire in more ways than one.

by Damaso's Burnt Shirt on Oct 26, 2011 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Vampires should be good at pitching, right?

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 26, 2011 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

not in day games though....

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Oct 27, 2011 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Another reason to play for the Jays :)

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 27, 2011 7:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

If he comes at a Rauch price, sure. I like the idea of adding him if his arm still has some life, because his experience will be a side benefit to a likely young bullpen. But I think someone will offer something a little higher on his name alone.

by dexfarkin on Oct 26, 2011 3:26 PM EDT via iPhone app reply actions   1 recs

I wouldn't

velocity is down, SwStr% is down, Contact% is up, and not a good groundballer. If he was 10 years younger you could say it was 2011 was an aberration, or you could say it’s because of the TJ, but I wouldn’t touch him.

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 3:34 PM EDT reply actions  

shockingly, I agree with Pikachu

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Oct 27, 2011 7:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Depends on the price

Another risky player that could be available is Grady Sizemore.

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 26, 2011 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I was thinking DH/CF or 4th OF. Or just in the OF when Morrow starts because he is a fly ball pitcher.

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 26, 2011 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes please!

He’s only 1 season removed from a 6 year stretch that ranks as some of the best relief pitching of all time. I don’t expect him to be THAT good again but his numbers were absolutely mind-blowing. In 2006 his WHIP was 0.790. I’ve never seen a number that low.

Man who has four balls cannot walk

by Beer Leaguer on Oct 26, 2011 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

2 seasons removed

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, why not?

If he bounces back and is the Nathan of old, you’ve got a valuable asset at the trade deadline (or if the Jays are in the playoff hunt, he makes the bullpen better). If he flops, it’s just money and the Jays will probably be spending some coin on relievers this offseason anyway.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones

by JaysfanDL on Oct 26, 2011 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

If you can for the right price, sure.

I tend to agree with Dexfarkin re: cost (Rauch price). I’d maybe consider a $5m/yr plus mutual option for a 2nd. That said, I doubt that will get it done. Someone who misses out on one of the big closers will probably give him $8m/yr or guaranteed 2 years, and I probably wouldn’t be that interested in that case.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Oct 26, 2011 4:01 PM EDT reply actions  

No thanks on Nathan.

I would much rather go after Jonathon Broxton, he’s younger, proven, got amazing stuff, and is a buy low option from bad performance then injury.

by Adamthebluejay on Oct 26, 2011 4:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I kinda agree

They are both quite concerning, but Broxton probably has the higher upside at this point in their respective careers, and will likely cost less. I suspect the real question is what the the medical reports say, and what the Jays’ scouts report.

by gabrielsyme on Oct 26, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Should be interested

It usually takes a year for a player to regain his form after Tommy John, so I would expect something similar to .207/263/.391 in 2012. Would be a good fit at a right price

by voislav on Oct 26, 2011 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

awesome

he’ll be very useful during interleague

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im always a fan

of buying low on a player and taking chances on players coming back form injury, you sign him for a year cheap maybe a club option for a second year and see how it goes, he has talent even at 37 he can be effective

by FenixL on Oct 26, 2011 5:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not a big fan of

RP that say they aren’t interested in being set up guys. I can understand not wanting to sign with a team that has an established closer but whether you pitch in the 8th or 9th should be based on your performance.

by Nadia on Oct 26, 2011 5:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Second that

a reliever comes out of the pen when his manager tells him to come out of the pen.

Ask TLR…

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Oct 27, 2011 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I believe this is more posturing than anything else

If you pull a Yankee’s, and offer him “Closer” money, to set-up. I think he’ll gladly do it.

Can't wait for some October Baseball.
@VagabondBansal

by Vagabond13 on Oct 28, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

sure why not

he’s probably not as good as his peak, but he’s probably still pretty good

by benk on Oct 26, 2011 5:43 PM EDT reply actions  

At this point, I'd rather keep Frank Frank

If it were Pre 2009 Nathan then I’d say hell yeah. Now a 36 year old RP one year removed from TJ. Probably want him as a setup guy for sure but he doesn’t want that so pass.

Broxton looks like someone to take a look at, but I’m not sure about his mental toughness especially against the AL East. He wasn’t the same guy after he blew that save against the Yanks.

In honor of the Jays 2nd Baseman who played with fire in more ways than one.

by Damaso's Burnt Shirt on Oct 26, 2011 6:12 PM EDT reply actions  

If we get a FF equivalent then we get a draft pick.

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 26, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably not

Francisco was pretty decent for both 2010 and 2011. Nathan had a pretty bad 2010, he’ll have to be really good to be worth type B.

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

What I meant is that if we sign FF, then we don’t get compensation for him :)

by JaysSaskatchewan on Oct 26, 2011 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

oic

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be more concerned about his velocity than mental toughness

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

2mph loss is pretty serious

However it might mean he threw his fastball with more movement and command like Koufax did (not to say Broxton was Koufax.)

His 2010 was looking like a world beater till he got a world beating by the Yanks.

In honor of the Jays 2nd Baseman who played with fire in more ways than one.

by Damaso's Burnt Shirt on Oct 26, 2011 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Papelbon?

A day that will live in infamy: August 4th, 2011, Sept. 28, 2011 wasn't bad either.
7 members waiting for Aaron Hill's return...

by jays182 on Oct 26, 2011 6:30 PM EDT reply actions  

k..k..kk..kill me

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

sorry

meant to agree that watching Papelbon would kill me……Besides who would I hate or love to watch blow key games?

by Keith72 on Oct 26, 2011 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

definitely go for it

1 – He does not cost us a pick
2 – We need help at the back end.
3 – If we are in it, we keep him and use the option. Out of the race we trade him

For up to 6 – 7M for one year and a club option, I definitely take this this risk.

by Keith72 on Oct 26, 2011 6:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd do it

I’d even go as far as 6 million for him. Take a gamble, I think it’s worth it. If he sucks, he’s still less than half what BJ Ryan cost to send home(poor reasoning I know, but Im pretty confident this won’t happen), and if he lives up to expectations, hopefully that results in a couple extra home games at the end of the year that will help pay for him.

by sportsguy2905 on Oct 26, 2011 6:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Imagine being able to purchase a 1st round pick

With a return to form, WE CAN. I was at the game he got Lind to ground out with the bases loaded to lose the game. He looked fine.

by IWantYu on Oct 26, 2011 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

He could look like Cy Young for all I care

His results have been way off.

Sad, Drunk, And Poorly

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you sure about that game

I saw that game on TV and I know it was his first game back from TJ, but he was awful.

Nathan’s line was 1IP 2H 1R 1ER 2BB 0K 31 pitches 16 balls 15 strikes does not look fine. It looks more Kevin Greggian.

Lind nearly bounced that 1st pitch slider down in the 1st base line for a game winner.

In honor of the Jays 2nd Baseman who played with fire in more ways than one.

by Damaso's Burnt Shirt on Oct 26, 2011 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I remember the game vividly, I was right behind home plate

the stats are misleading, Mike Mccoy hit a dead quail to right for a base hit. The only run allowed was a sac fly. He (Nathan) smartly walked Bautista and then got Lind for the Save. Talk about feeling pressure it was his first game situation in a LONG time.
Not to say I think hes great or anything but hes an upgrade on Rauch and has a very decent chance of landing us draft picks, thats what I like most

by IWantYu on Oct 26, 2011 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I went back to the box score to jar my memories of that game

He couldn’t find the plate with Juan Rivera (walked him on 5 pitches)
IIRC he was actually trying to get Jose out, and walked him on a 3-2 pitch. The reason why Adam swung at the first pitch was because Nathan’s control/command was awful compared to what it was before. Nathan fooled him with a first pitch slider as Lind was sitting on a 1st pitch get me over fastball.

In honor of the Jays 2nd Baseman who played with fire in more ways than one.

by Damaso's Burnt Shirt on Oct 26, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

ALSO

Denard Span homered off Rauch to win it.

by IWantYu on Oct 26, 2011 7:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Do it

we need good relievers, he can be just as good as some of the premium guys for half the price. At worst hes like Rauch and we lose 5-7 million. At best he returns to form and vastly improves our bullpen

by STZ513 on Oct 26, 2011 7:58 PM EDT reply actions  

and possibly nets us a pick or 2

by STZ513 on Oct 26, 2011 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, I changed my mind

after a godawful April, he wasn’t really that bad. I wouldn’t mind him on a 1 year deal

My New Favourite Song

If you don't like video game music, I don't think we can be friends.

@medical_sword's #1 fan.

by Pikachu on Oct 26, 2011 8:05 PM EDT reply actions  

I am a no because I would like the Jays to start searching for someone that could realistically handle the position for more than a year. I don’t think the Jays will be able to get Nathan in one of the team friendly contracts where you get a draft pick when he is done.

If they can get him to sign one of those contracts that turns into easy draft pick compensation, then sure.

by Joey P on Oct 26, 2011 9:08 PM EDT reply actions  

but we know how long term contracts for relievers tend to work out

unless you mean, like, convert Alvarez to closer, which would almost definitely be a bad idea

by benk on Oct 26, 2011 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's 37

And coming off major surgery. I think his best years are behind him. I don’t see him being any better than what we have now. Regardless of how good his numbers used to be. We need bullpen help, but we can’t be desperate.

by outoforder87 on Oct 27, 2011 1:09 AM EDT reply actions  

You think his best years are behind him?

Well yes they are!

That has nothing to do with this question though, unless the Jays pay big $$ on a multi-year deal, which they wouldn’t do.

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Oct 27, 2011 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

PLEASE NO!

He’s too expensive, old and inconsistent to be even considered. Lots of young guns in our system that could be tried. Remember BJ?

by Marcos Montenegro on Oct 27, 2011 8:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Not quite the same situation as BJ Ryan,

Definitely wouldn’t be 5 year deal.
Not coming off a career year
Not considered a top closer in the game at the moment
Older

I think you'll find I'm universally recognised as a mature and responsible adult.
Twitter is the thing with all the tweets...

by JohnnyG on Oct 27, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

i voted yes

he was terrible in the first part of the year, then went on the DL, and came back looking more or less like the nathan of old. the difference: his velocity was way up after he came from the DL: http://www.fangraphs.com/pitchfxo.aspx?playerid=1122&position=P&pitch=FA

i would expect him to be much closer to the pitcher he was in the 2nd half of last year than the pitcher he was in the 1st half.

by Jono411 on Oct 28, 2011 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about our heroic azure-tinged corvidae, the Toronto Blue Jays.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hal2_small
Quantifying the Effect of Team Defense on Over/Underperforming the Team's FIP
Small
Brett Lawrie's historic defensive prowess

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blue Jays Player Stats Multiplied by 4
Small
Petition to change Suckage Award Titles
Jaysfanimage_small
The Lansing 4: What to do when they outpitch expectations?
Misc_003_small
Jays' All-Star Alliterative Name Team
Kingkelly_small
Stats tools?
Small
Jays Future Closer?
N41306733_31278203_7401_steve_golfin_small
my MLB power ranking, May Edition
Jaysfanimage_small
Blue Jays Farm Report - Apr 29-May 5

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Bluejayperched_small hugo

Rincewind-1_small Tom Dakers

Assistant Manager

Smith_up_small JohnnyG

Authors

Hiro_small jessef

Profile_small masterkembo

Profiel_small Woodman663

Minorleaguer_small Minor Leaguer

Tony_fernandez_small TonyFernandezSavedMyLife

Moderators

J_bau_small jays182

Aejfuulciaar18g_small Bowling_Guy25