Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Heating Up: Miami Evens Series; LeBron, Wade Take Charge

Toronto Should Target Clint Barmes at Second Base


The Toronto Blue Jays club currently has an opening at second base. A number of names have been bandied about including incumbent Kelly Johnson, former Jay Aaron Hill (who recently re-upped with Arizona), and Jamey Carroll (who just agreed to terms with Minnesota).

The best free agent option for Toronto, though, is Clint Barmes, an infielder who spent 2011 playing shortstop for the Houston Astros. The former Rockies draft pick hit just .244 but he produced a 3.1 WAR, good for a value of $14.1 million according to FanGraphs calculations. He made just over $3 million in '11 and is in line for a modest raise (probably no more than $5 million per season). He'll open the 2012 season at 33 years of ago so a two-year, $8-10 million contact might be reasonable.

Despite the "meh" batting average, Barmes walks at a reasonable clip (7.7%) and has line-drive power that produces a good number of doubles and 10-12 home runs a season. He's also a good base runner (who doesn't steal a ton of bases). Barmes handles the bat quite well and has a history of being able to bunt, sacrifice, and advance base runners.

Star-divide


This is important because he could fill a vital need for the Jays, not only at the keystone, but in the No. 2 hole in the lineup. The Jays club needs to get hitters on base - and into scoring position - in front of slugger Jose Bautista. Anyone who watched the club in 2011 knows that the Jays lineup struggled to play small ball and did not do a good job at advancing base runners. Barmes fits the No. 2 spot much better then the two players who spent the most time there last season: Corey Patterson and Eric Thames.

The real value in Barmes lies in his defense. He has experience at shortstop, second base and a little third base. According to his career UZR rates, Barmes is an above-average fielder at both middle infield positions. With four pitchers - including staff ace Ricky Romero - currently boasting above-average ground-ball tendencies, a strong middle infield is important.

1. Luis Perez 60.3 GB% in 2011
2. Ricky Romero 54.7
3. Joel Carreno 53.7
4. Henderson Alvarez 53.5

Barmes' posted a 10.8 UZR/150 at shortstop in '11. The last time he played second base regularly (‘09) he had a 6.1 UZR/150. Johnson had a 3.1 UZR/150 rate split between Arizona and Toronto in '11 and his career rate is -0.6. Former Jay Aaron Hill's career UZR/150 rate is 4.1. Barmes would be an outstanding option at second base, while also offering protection at two other positions.

Like C/1B/LF Ryan Doumit, whom I previously recommended for the Jays, Barmes is not a star player but he fills multiple club needs as a defensive-minded veteran with the necessary skills to fill the No. 2 spot in the lineup. He also comes at a reasonable cost (based on current market projections) and would not block any young players.

Comment 96 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This is important because he could fill a vital need for the Jays, not only at the keystone, but in the No. 2 hole in the lineup. The Jays club needs to get hitters on base – and into scoring position – in front of slugger Jose Bautista. Anyone who watched the club in 2011 knows that the Jays lineup struggled to play small ball and did not do a good job at advancing base runners. Barmes fits the No. 2 spot much better then the two players who spent the most time there last season: Corey Patterson and Eric Thames.

You want the Jays to give a 31 year old with a career .302 OBP the starting 2B job and the number 2 spot in the lineup?

No. Thank. You.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 15, 2011 4:46 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Averaged more than 2 WAR for the last 4 seasons

don’t have a better option, other than Johnson, but I really want that draft pick

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 15, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

He's probably the next best 2B after Johnson

If Johnson signs elsewhere, then I’m ok with Barmes. Just not ok with Barmes hitting No. 2.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones

by JaysfanDL on Nov 15, 2011 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

and I really don’t think the Jays will be winning next year

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 15, 2011 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Then why not pursue someone that might be worthwhile as a future option? I can sorta understand signing Barmes if you are going to spend money elsewhere next year and want a defensive presence that hits 9th, while you load up your money elsewhere and contend. But if not, what’s the point?

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 15, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

like who?

There’s really no options available. You could save a little more money by using McCoy, I guess.

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 15, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Considering they are already paying Hech, might as well have him instructed by the big boys.

Or, make a trade.

I am somewhat coming around after reviewing Barmes defensive reputation. But to suggest (repeatedly!!!) that he is good solution for the number 2 spot in the lineup is just baffling to me.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 15, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

"the number two spot"

I don’t think he’ll be hitting second in the lineup, to be honest

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 15, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I would assume Farrell wouldn’t do that.

That said, making comments like that reflects poorly on the rest of the article. Especially when it talks about OBP being important, and then suggesting a terrible OBP player be inserted directly in front of Bautista.

If the article said “sign Barmes to be a stopgap at 2B for his excellent defensive abilities and with the ability to have him on a cheap enough contract to be moved to the bench as soon as a better player is acquired”, I would have probably said “that seems reasonable enough”.

Heck. Sign both him and KJ, and end this Mike McCoy experiment. I’d be ok with that.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 15, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Assuming Barmes’ defense doesn’t drop at all as he plays his 33 and 34 year old seasons, he is at best a defensive 2B that should hit no higher than 9th.

Suggesting that he hit 2nd in the lineup is bizarre to me.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 15, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said that, I responded to Pikachu's comment...

Realistically, Johnson is the best option but Jays need to find a long term solution. As far as I know, we have no promising middle infield prospects except for Hech and who knows whether he’ll ever be able to hit.
Best case scenario, AA trades for a young promising second basemen.

by Nadia on Nov 15, 2011 9:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Barmes would be an okay stop-gap

If Kelly Johnson declines arbitration, and we don’t find a better 2B on the trade market that works for the Jays, then sure, Barmes would be acceptable. But let’s not give him a two-year contract.

by gabrielsyme on Nov 15, 2011 6:08 PM EST reply actions  

In response...

The OBP is dragged down by the AVG – you can’t just look at the OBP when deciding if a player should be at the top of the order. Barmes has a walk rate of more than 7%, which is reasonable for No. 2 hitters.

Top of the order guys like Michael Bourn, Jose Reyes, and Jacoby Ellsbury all had similar walk rates. If you move his BABIP up .030 to league average levels, his OBP would be .340, which is not terrible.

The article didn’t suggest OBP was important as a blanket statement. In the same sentence you’re getting that from, it states that it’s also important to move the runners into scoring position. If you look at Barmes’ sacrifice numbers over his career, they are among the best in the Majors during that time frame.

As well, if he does decline in the second year of his contract you can use him as a glove-first utility player in the John McDonald mold.

Who would fit better as the No. 2 hitter among the players currently on the 40-man roster?

by Marc Hulet on Nov 15, 2011 6:17 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Well, I'm a fan of the Book

So, one of the Jays best hitters. Bautista should hit 4th, so Lawrie would make a lot of sense in the 2-hole.

by gabrielsyme on Nov 15, 2011 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 16, 2011 7:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Number two

Rasmus, Snider, Thames, Escobar, Encarnacion, Lawrie…lots of better options. Barmes is a 9 hitter at best. And sacrifice bunts have been proven to be counter effective statistically.

by TimZig on Nov 15, 2011 6:24 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Joe Inglett?

.283 .342 .392 .734

That is Joe Inglett’s career batting line.

He filled in for an injured Aaron Hill for almost a full season, and I don’t remember him being disastrous defensively.

Given the thin market at 2B, it’s funny that he isn’t being discussed… Reputation as a backup I guess? (similar to pre-Jays Scutaro?)

by REMO on Nov 15, 2011 6:36 PM EST reply actions  

Voodoo Joe is certainly an upgrade on McCoy at the very least.

by dexfarkin on Nov 15, 2011 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

haha, Voodoo Joe.. Forgot about that. He was a favourite of mine

Agreed on McCoy. I think that overall, he could be as good as Barmes, Ellis and some of the other options out there as well… not to mention 2010 and 2011 Hill.

I won’t happen though.

by REMO on Nov 15, 2011 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, McCoy can play SS, which Inglett cannot

However, he’s an interesting option for 2B. He was decent in ’08 when Hill went down. His stats look terrible the last two years but that might be due to only playing part time.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones

by JaysfanDL on Nov 16, 2011 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Why did we let him go in the first place?

He was solid defensively when he wasn’t in the outfield. Without looking deeper into his stats I also remember him being almost impossible to strike out. He almost had an Ichiro like swing with decent speed which makes him almost impossible to double up on a grounder. Sounds like a good #2 hitter to me.

Man who has four balls cannot walk

by Beer Leaguer on Nov 16, 2011 1:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I actually dont hate it

But to me he makes more sense as a utitility type. I think we get a 2 bagger via trade and also if hes ever in the lineup, he bet6ter be in the bottom third. not hitting second haha

Another idea for catcher

Jeff Mathis? likely to be non tendered

by Brett4PM on Nov 15, 2011 9:33 PM EST reply actions  

No

NONONONOONNONONO

No Mathis

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 15, 2011 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I’l call your “NONONONOONNONONO” and raise it by a couple more NONOs…

Mathis,… ugh

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Nov 16, 2011 10:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Hmm

I actually might prefer Mathis over Doumit. Mathis is horrible with the bat, but does seem to have the framing and other defensive skills that Doumit lacks. I guess it really depends on whether you want your backup catcher to have offensive or defensive skills.

by siggian on Nov 16, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

He's impossibly bad at hittting though

wRC+ since 2007:
60, 53(!), 56(!), 32(!!!), 26(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

Check yoself before you rec yoself.

by Gerse on Nov 16, 2011 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

It's what happens when you make a backup catcher the fulltime catcher

I have no idea what Scioscia sees in the guy. Maybe Mathis has some compromising photos of his manager.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones

by JaysfanDL on Nov 16, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

actually

he played more in 2008~2009 than he did in 2010~2011

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe in some weird BTTF way Scioscia is gradually fading from the pictures?

Check yoself before you rec yoself.

by Gerse on Nov 16, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

nah

he played more in 2011 than he did in 2010

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

That article about pitch framing

Might explain what Scioscia sees in Mathis.

by siggian on Nov 16, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

is Mathis not the worst batting regular starting position player in baseball over the past 4 years? In fact, the season Adam Dunn put up this year is comparable to Mathis’s career season average. I don’t see AA ever making a deal and getting the worst hitting player in baseball no matter how good defensively he is.

by Sean Coleman on Nov 15, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

that 14.1 million dollar value

made me LOL. big time lollergags

by ddbumpus on Nov 15, 2011 9:52 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

that just goes to sow that

while WAR is a very useful tool, it couldn’t be the all-important-single measure-for-how good-a-player-is that some believe it to be.

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Nov 16, 2011 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Barmes or Johnson at 2B…what a depressing topic. My problem with Barmes is his BB%. Its true that it was 7.7% last year (whether or not this is a “reasonable clip” i suppose is another debate). The season before it was 8.1% which was even better however prior to that, it is’n pretty. 2005-4.2% 2006-4.1% 2008-4.1% 2009-5.1% If 2010 was a career peak and his BB% continues to decline back to his career average, he really offers very little offensively at all. I suppose I would have to lean towards Johnson over Barmes though i find neither particularity enticing. To me, there is a higher probability that by some slim chance Johnson finds his swing and returns back to his 3.5 to 6 WAR then the probability that Barmes ever even duplicates his career high of 3.1 WAR that he put up playing for a horrible Astros team last year. Of course, the fact that Barmes does hit a lot of line drives would make his outs a lot more exciting then Kelly Johnson’s popups/fly balls so i suppose that’s a point for Barmes.

by Sean Coleman on Nov 15, 2011 10:20 PM EST reply actions  

what's the problem with Johnson?

3 WAR average over past 3 years. I think people don’t like him because he doesn’t do anything that stands out in people’s minds well. he takes some walks, hits for decent power but plays average defense, is only a little bit fast, and strikes out a lot. he’s a solid player.

by benk on Nov 16, 2011 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s a little surprising how sour people are on Johnson. Even in 2011, which was bad, it wasn’t completely disasterious. He still showed plenty of power and the ability to take a walk. Unless Johnson is looking for big money or years commitment, I’d still support trying to lock him up for at least a couple of years.

by dexfarkin on Nov 16, 2011 7:48 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s baffling to me as well. If we hadn’t traded for him and watched him up close for the last 2 months, I assume he’d be high on the list of “undervalued guys we’d want AA to target”.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Nov 16, 2011 7:49 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

ding ding ding

Check yoself before you rec yoself.

by Gerse on Nov 16, 2011 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah I dont get it either and I dont know why people are so obsessed with the pick.

People, we have a good farm system, lets actually try to improve the club now and KJ is the best 2nd baseman on the market and as you said, he’s not spectacular but he is solid with an all-around game.

im hoping we re-sign him

by Sniderlover on Nov 16, 2011 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

pick up scutaro to play 2nd base

scutaro plays well defensely and can hit for average and rbi. alternatively, use brett lawrie at 2nd and edwin E or bautista at 3rd.

by jack w on Nov 15, 2011 11:21 PM EST reply actions  

baited…

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assaults of thought on the unthinking." (J.M Keynes)

by HESS2479 on Nov 16, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

meh

a. Barmes is suited more for the 8 or 9 hole. Getting on base 30% of the time is not what I want out of the 2 hole
b. at age 33, I’m not expecting him to repeat his levels of the past few years. I’d rather take Johnson, going into his age 30 season, even with poorer glove.
c. We don’t know what the compensation situation will be until the CBA is agreed, so picks as compensation may not be as high for Johnson as in past years. Hopefully that bit of business will be resolved shortly.

by msgg139 on Nov 15, 2011 11:39 PM EST reply actions  

predo for thames with snider in left

atlanta gets a young outfielder and we have our second baseman

by ADIL on Nov 16, 2011 12:19 AM EST reply actions  

i've been thinking about this

i think it would be good for both teams

by Jono411 on Nov 16, 2011 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

you know what would be better?

Thames for Prado and Heyward.

but yeah, it’s a nice trade for both teams

by benk on Nov 16, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

even better

throw in Teahen and bring back Jurjjens. Let’s do it ;)

by khaleeji on Nov 16, 2011 1:11 AM EST up reply actions  

jurrjens?

I was thinking Hanson instead. why not?? :)

by ddbumpus on Nov 16, 2011 8:31 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Barmes

Has not been good since he fell up the stairs with Todd Helton’s deer meat. If he was good before that…which he probably wasn’t.
As a result AA will not pay him real money, because he tends to avoid real money to guys who aren’t good.

by Underachiever11 on Nov 16, 2011 5:47 PM EST reply actions  

So I guess

That AA will not pay him in venison?

by siggian on Nov 17, 2011 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

howie kendrick is eligible for arbitration in 2012 and would be a great addition to the Jays

kendrick can play 2B and also 1B and LF. he has very good bat control and can be great hitting #2 in the lineup between escobar and bautista.

by jack w on Nov 16, 2011 9:52 PM EST reply actions  

sure

but he’s likely to be expensive and we don’t even know if he’s going to make it all the way to free agency. I don’t think hoping guys become FAs and then hoping they sign with you is a good strategy, though teams do occasionally do it

by benk on Nov 16, 2011 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

sometime you need to spend big $$$ to get a key player to become a winning team

kendrick has had a high batting avg for 6 consecutive seasons in the majors and also several years in the minors. jays need to learn to pay up for consistency. it cost the jays to pick up joe carter and robbie alomar in 1990, but they were key pieces to create a winning team. these days, the jays pay big $$$ to unproven one-season wonders like aaron hill, bj ryan, adam lind, alex rios, vernon wells, etc. or they pick up non-impact players like corey patterson, jon rauch, juan rivera, etc. for big $$$ to create a .500 or sub-.500 ball team.

by jack w on Nov 16, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

sometimes the answer is just that simple

kelly johnson will also be very expensive and kj does not even come close to kendrick in terms of consistency.

by jack w on Nov 16, 2011 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

this is true

okay, I agree with you on some points but not on others.

yeah, I kind of agree that we need to be acquiring some elite talent to compete, but I very much don’t think that acquiring a player at the peak of his value (or close to it anyway) with only one year of team control is the way to do it. I’m not prepared to give up our only elite prospect (the conversation starts at d’Arnaud) plus more to get him. KJ isn’t as good, yes, but I don’t think he’s going to cost much more than like $8M/year tops.

the second part is that Hill and Lind were pretty highly touted prospects. I don’t think many people saw them completely fall off a cliff like they did. Rios was coming off back-to-back 5 WAR seasons, I don’t think many people saw his collapse either. Wells was a bad deal, as was Ryan, but all of these deals were signed by the previous administration.

Rauch had had four straight good years before 2011. Patterson is an acceptable 4th outfielder, it’s not his fault Snider couldn’t hit and Davis got injured. Rivera had to be taken in order to make the Wells trade.

the 2011 Jays are much further from contention than the 1992 Blue Jays are. completely different scenarios

by benk on Nov 16, 2011 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm a massive fan of Howie Kendrick

I think the price just might be a little high. But if we want to go for it then I think trading prospects for him this year would make sense.

by Mike Andrew on Nov 16, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

only if he can be extended

and he’s coming off a near 6 win season… he’d be really expensive

by benk on Nov 16, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

The only way I would even bother picking up the phone is if he got off to a rocky start next season. I have a feeling he would be willing to sign an extension for the right $$ figures. Just a hunch :P

by Mike Andrew on Nov 16, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

okay

prepare to trade d’Arnaud+

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Naw

I would only do it if his value was lessened by a rocky start or something but even in full swing I don’t think he would command a top 5 farm systems best prospect. Especially one that plays a rare position.

I would see a few serviceable major leaguers(Lind, Edwin, Thames), top 10 prospect and a high ceiling guy who is in low-A/high-A

I’m no pro so that’s just a guess.

by Mike Andrew on Nov 16, 2011 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

true

he only has 2 years of control left.

Lind/Edwin are zero to no value for the Angels, they’re full at 1B/DH.

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Kendrick?

BB-ref shows him at 5 years, 91 days of service time, so he’d only have 1 more year of control

by MjwW on Nov 16, 2011 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

if the jays prove to be a serious contender, good players will want to stay regardless of control

we have control of travis snider and colby rasmus, but these guys seem to choke in the majors thus resulting in a .500 ball club. kendrick is a strong impact player.

by jack w on Nov 16, 2011 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

kendrick has a overall batting avg of .292 over 6 seasons in the majors

if that is not an impact player, i don’t know what is. i don’t think the jays currently have any hitters that have that kind of a stat. i am sure bautista, escobar and lawrie may have that one day.

by jack w on Nov 16, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Kendrick's career line pre-2011

.295/.327/.425, 99 OPS+, with above average defense.

That’s a good player. That’s not an impact player, in my opinion.

I would say Yunel Escobar is a better player, and a much more valuable player, thanks to his awesome contract. Kelly Johnson is also close.

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 11:26 PM EST up reply actions  

but I'm not taking anything away from his 2011

it was a very good year, but he’s definitely going to be overvalued.

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

really?

Kendrick career: .292/.329/.434
Johnson career: .260/.343/.441

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

of course

there’s the defense and baserunning issues, in which Kendrick has a lead in, but Johnson has the edge in health.

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, whoops

my bad, I thought he becomes a FA after 2013

Illuminate My Heart, My Darling!
Rookie writer at Baseball Canadiana
Twitter? I hardly know her!

by Pikachu on Nov 16, 2011 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about our heroic azure-tinged corvidae, the Toronto Blue Jays.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hal2_small
Quantifying the Effect of Team Defense on Over/Underperforming the Team's FIP
Small
Brett Lawrie's historic defensive prowess

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blue Jays Player Stats Multiplied by 4
Small
Petition to change Suckage Award Titles
Jaysfanimage_small
The Lansing 4: What to do when they outpitch expectations?
Misc_003_small
Jays' All-Star Alliterative Name Team
Kingkelly_small
Stats tools?
Small
Jays Future Closer?
N41306733_31278203_7401_steve_golfin_small
my MLB power ranking, May Edition
Jaysfanimage_small
Blue Jays Farm Report - Apr 29-May 5

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Bluejayperched_small hugo

Rincewind-1_small Tom Dakers

Assistant Manager

Smith_up_small JohnnyG

Authors

Hiro_small jessef

Profile_small masterkembo

Profiel_small Woodman663

Minorleaguer_small Minor Leaguer

Tony_fernandez_small TonyFernandezSavedMyLife

Moderators

J_bau_small jays182

Aejfuulciaar18g_small Bowling_Guy25