Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Heating Up: Miami Evens Series; LeBron, Wade Take Charge

FAN VOTE: What should be the jays 2012 starting lineup? Thames or Snider

After making a FanPost viewing what looks to be the 2012 starting lineup & guessing what Farrell WOULD do on opening day, there were tons of debate on what we as jays fans should do for their 2012 lineup. So I say, why don't we get alittle excitement going here & get a vote going on the lineup 1 through 9 here.

Before we can determine who should bat #1 for the Blue Jays, we need to determine our starting lineup. I'd say 8 positions are solidified, the only real battle going into the start of the season (barring injuries/trades) is in LF between Travis Snider & Eric Thames. So lets do a vote here to determine who you think should be the opening day Left Fielder for the Blue Jays.

Star-divide

I think theres no debating that Snider has shown more promise in the field thus far, especially with big improvements in 2011, and also showing a very strong/accurate throwing arm. But his struggles & inconsistency at the plate continued in 2011, and it was/is one of the most frustrating things for Jays fans to see, everytime he is tearing it up in the minors & you get glimpses of it in the majors, then it fades away to nothing.

Meanwhile Thames was a pleasant surprise in 2012. His fielding is ughhhh, well, its a left fielders fielding for sure. But he did show some consistency at the plate, and some very good power, but has lacked ability to take a walk (and strikes out more then you'd like).

Keep in mind also, Thames is 1 year older then Snider, it may not seem like that as we've seen so much of Snider, but he is still a very young player.

Its most likely the loser of this preseason battle will be sent to the minors to maxamise their plate appearances before getting called up due to injury or possible contention.

Poll
Who should be the Jays starting Left Fielder in 2012?
Travis Snider
182 votes
Eric Thames
67 votes

249 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 68 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

my vote is snider

at this point I believe that him and dwayne murphy just on’t click. And I’m not sure if they ever will unfortunately, so this may not be the right choice. But I do believe the potential in Snider, the fact hes a better fielder, and that he’s still younger then Thames; I want to give him every single chance to succeed.

Another rough outing could be extremely tough on him though, and if I don’t see improvements from him/rasmus/Arencibia (most importantly, taking more walks) i am seriously considering firing Murphy & giving Chad Matolla the chance to work with these youngsters at the big league level after all the success he’s had in the minors.

by TheMainEvent on Dec 8, 2011 9:33 PM EST reply actions  

…i am seriously considering firing Murphy & giving Chad Matolla the chance

So this is AA’s psuedonym?

by MjwW on Dec 8, 2011 9:58 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I would suggest waiting on doing any line-up voting

So much of the winter is left, I would AA still has some moves up his sleeve, be they free agents or trades.

Consider the moves made after this date:
In 2009-10 winter – Buck signing (12/16), Morrow trade (12/23), Molina signing (2/19)
In 2010-11 winter – EE signing (12/12), Patterson signing (12/21), Dotel signing (1/4), Rauch signing (1/17), Wells trade (1/21), Francisco trade (1/25)

Based off this, I’d wait until the New Year if you really want to do it. Personally, I think the discussion in the other thread was a better forum for it, but obviously it’s up ot you.

by MjwW on Dec 8, 2011 10:07 PM EST reply actions  

who do you really see being bumped from the lineup?

outside of a jaw dropping trade that would move one of these starters out, i don’t see anybody in this lineup being bumped to the bench. and…. people want to talk jays, regardless if this is the final lineup, this is a way of getting a fun discussion going.

by TheMainEvent on Dec 8, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously?

I’d argue none of 1B/DH/LF are locked down. I think if they brought in a bat as a FA, then Lind and EE platoon at first.

Anyway, just my two cents. By all means, proceed

by MjwW on Dec 8, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Well, it depends

Depends on if the hitting coaches think Snider has fixed the problem that causes him to hit balls weakly. If they don’t, I don’t see much reason to let Snider struggle in the majors again.

Blogging about the Toronto Blue Jays at Bluebird Banter

by Woodman663 on Dec 9, 2011 6:07 AM EST reply actions  

I think it entirely depends

On how things go in spring training for both of them. I think that Snider has the incumbent advantage, but it’s a slim lead and he really doesn’t have a margin for error.

by siggian on Dec 9, 2011 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

Hey everyone can you help me with this?

Apparently a couple of seasons ago there was some sort of issue between Cito and Travis and/or Travis and Murphy.

Can anyone tell me what happened and what it was all about? I have heard about it mentioned in passing but never heard the full story on what happened.

by TrueBlue4Ever! on Dec 9, 2011 12:09 PM EST reply actions  

I think Snider needs to be given another shot

This is his last option year, so they really need to see if he’s worthy of an every day spot in starting lineup. Thames has plenty of options, so another season in Vegas won’t hurt. I think he’d have a good attitude about it too. In the event of an injury, he’d be the first call up.

Another option might be to give him some at bats at DH with EE. However, I think I’d prefer having him work on his defense at AAA, and maybe keep Cooper up as the left handed bat off the bench.

by REMO on Dec 9, 2011 6:58 PM EST reply actions  

I voted Snider

But Thames should be first man off the bench for any injuries to LF/CF/RF/3B/DH. Snider deserves another shot but Thames doesn’t deserve to be sent back down to AA after showing so much progress in the majors.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 9, 2011 10:20 PM EST reply actions  

he doesnt deserve it

but he should get it because its much more benificial for him to start down there & bat in the top 4, get tons of at bats & field time, and get called up when a spot opens. For either of them, i’d prefer to see that rather then sit on the bench & bat every 2nd or 3rd game

by TheMainEvent on Dec 9, 2011 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

He could play 100+ games covering 5 positions

Because of how people would move based on injuries and days off.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 9, 2011 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

but wouldn’t you rather a severely defensively-challenged player get all the reps he can?

by Gerse on Dec 10, 2011 2:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Well then

If Eric Thames can’t improve defensively. Neither can JP.

JP is several months older and also terrible defensively. One could also make the case he doesn’t frame pitches well and is a bad game caller. Maybe both should be sent down to AAA for life?

I heard once you turn 25, you start regressing.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 10, 2011 11:32 AM EST up reply actions  

that's exactly the opposite of what Gerse said

he said because Thames is bad at defense, we should give him as many reps as possible so he can improve

by benk on Dec 10, 2011 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

lol

arencibia is the starter and could start 130 games this year, so hes getting that much needed playing time but at the major league level.

by TheMainEvent on Dec 10, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I know he is

But I’m trying to argue that if JP can improve/is expected to improve then why isn’t Thames?

People act like Thames is a finished product.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 10, 2011 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

to be honest

I don’t expect Arencibia to improve. At best, he’ll be below average, I think.

Derp

by Pikachu on Dec 10, 2011 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

That isn't...thing.

Your sarcastic analysis has also entirely ignored any of the zillion of other factors that contribute to a player’s ability.
Logic!

by Gerse on Dec 10, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I know

But you can’t argue that Thames can’t improve.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 10, 2011 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Reading comp!
Wouldn’t you rather a severely defensively-challenged player get all the reps he can?
that’s exactly the opposite of what Gerse said
he said because Thames is bad at defense, we should give him as many reps as possible so he can improve

by Gerse on Dec 10, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Sarcasm doesn't work on the internet

When did I ever suggest playing Thames not in the field? If E5 got injured Bautista could move to DH and Thames to RF?

I think he can get more than enough reps filling in for 5 positions. Between injuries and days off he can be in the lineup quite frequently.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 10, 2011 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Where's the sarcasm?

I didn’t say you did. I said that he would learn more by playing 1) every day and 2) in the same position

by Gerse on Dec 10, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Well when you put it that way

It makes sense. IMO Snider should start still.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 10, 2011 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree. This whole thing was in reference to why it might be advantageous to send Thames down to AAA at the start of the season, even though his performance last year warrants MLB time at some point this year.

by Gerse on Dec 10, 2011 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

why would they put bautista at dh and thames in the field

when bautista is a far greater outfielder then thames. That wouldn’t make any sense unless we want to give up on the season right away lol

by TheMainEvent on Dec 11, 2011 1:16 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

far greater?

-10.6 UZR/150 for Bautista and -15.5 UZR/150 for Thames. I would argue that Thames will be a better fielder next year and Bautista worse. It would also protect Bautista from injury and give Thames reps.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 11, 2011 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

In fact

exactly zero people in this thread (from your initial comment, not the whole post) have said that Thames can’t improve.

by Gerse on Dec 10, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

They tell you not to use it because it's not reliable

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Dec 12, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

That's why

you go to the wiki article on the thing you’re writing about, then go to the list of sources at the bottom and use those.
Same information, real sources.

by Gerse on Dec 12, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

You're not getting my point

I’m not saying check the sources to see if wiki is correct. I’m saying totally ignore whatever wikipedia says, and just use it as link dump.

by Gerse on Dec 12, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I see what you're saying, I just think it's a waste of time

It’s faster to just go to a source that doesn’t have to be checked. But I still use books sometimes for research, so maybe I’m just old, haha.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Dec 12, 2011 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Snider Sucks

This guy can’t hit and if he can improve in the field why can’t Thames. I’d even take Thames at DH over EE any day. I’m surprized at the voting do any of you watch the games, Snider comes up with men on…well we can forget about scoring any runs now…

by dmon on Dec 10, 2011 7:52 AM EST reply actions  

Eh

I don’t think it’s delete-worthy. he/she’s not being troll-y or anything (you could argue that I’m the one being troll-y)

Derp

by Pikachu on Dec 10, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Classic troll lines

“playername sucks”
“Do you even watch the game?”

Rent this for cheap!!

by Bowling_Guy25 on Dec 10, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

ah

i missed the "Do you even watch the game?" part

Derp

by Pikachu on Dec 10, 2011 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Do you even read the comments!??!!

Rent this for cheap!!

by Bowling_Guy25 on Dec 10, 2011 12:11 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

if we could afford cable

don’t you think we could afford to move out of our parents’ basements?

by SuckaMD on Dec 10, 2011 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I actually live in my uncle's basement

my parents were starting to charge me money

Blogging about the Toronto Blue Jays at Bluebird Banter

by Woodman663 on Dec 10, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

snider doesnt suck

hes a great prospect who hasn’t materialized at the majors yet. But he’s still only 23, and has shown a much higher talent level in the minors then thames, so why would you give up on him when you know thames ceiling & you know sniders ceiling is much higher.

by TheMainEvent on Dec 10, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

he hasn't materialized into a star yet

so he’s not Pujols, but he’s been a league-average player (1.7 fWAR) through a little more than a full season’s worth of PA (877) over 3 seasons despite breaking into the bigs at 21, suffering injury trouble and being jerked around by the franchise.

That’s actually pretty good. There are tons of guys who end up being very good players, and even stars, who don’t even sniff the majors until they are 23 or older. And plenty of guys who have done what Snider has thus far turn into very good players.

Snider’s BBref Similar Batter’s through Age 23 list includes players like:
1) former Jays hitting coach Larry Hisle, who put up a 22.5 offensive rWAR peak over 6 years in the 70’s
2) George Hendrick – 14 orWAR over 4 years from age 24-27 in the 70s
3) Bobby Murcer – 4.2, 8.3, 7.1, 4.6 orWAR age 24-27
4) Hall of Famer Ralph Kiner who OPS+’ed 173 at age 24.

Sure, there are some guys on that list who flopped, too, but it’s too early to simply say that Snider sucks and should be discarded. Especially if the alternative is Thames. If Snider was blocking Heyward, then that’s a different story.

by SuckaMD on Dec 10, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

League average

Is closer to 2.3-2.5 fWAR in a full season’s worth of PAs – the average to replacement translation is 2 fWAR/600 PAs. So over 877 PAs, he’d need almost 3 fWAR to be league average. So that 1.7 fWAR isn’t very good at all

That’s not to say, as you note, that he couldn’t yet be a good player.

by MjwW on Dec 10, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

alright

in 2010 he was still a league average/slightly better player

by benk on Dec 10, 2011 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

should have added

the only season he’s been anything approximating healthy when he was playing

by benk on Dec 10, 2011 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't trying to prove he was "doing well"

I was speaking more to the “Snider comes up with men on you can forget about scoring runs” comment. It was only a month’s worth of work but that’s all there is to go on for his latest stint

by Aidin on Dec 12, 2011 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

As it stands

If both go with the Jays into spring training, it will be a compitition for left field. Snider is going to have to win the starting job back. It’s not really a case of who should be starting in left, but who will win the starting job.

by Alan F. on Dec 10, 2011 5:52 PM EST reply actions  

When is Snider going to be a given full big league season?

Still don’t know why Thames stayed with the team last year and Travis was sent down. I get that we needed to see Thames, but Snider is a “premium talent” and he was coming off a pretty good month. Thames’ bat might have been marginally better at that point in the season, but they’re worlds apart defensively. Its actually ridiculous how big the gap is

by Aidin on Dec 12, 2011 3:05 PM EST reply actions  

Personally

I think players who play their first year on a new field with a new surface and don’t fare well should get a second chance. That’s not scientific but it makes sense.

I think Snider should start, but I hate how people think they’re “worlds apart” defensively.

by Mike Andrew on Dec 12, 2011 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

from the only data we have

they are. possible in the order of two wins through a whole season. I don’t think Thames is that bad, but I’d be pretty shocked if he ever turned into an average defensive corner OF. I think he’d be lucky to be as good as Bautista defensively

by benk on Dec 12, 2011 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

probably wont get that chance until hes out of options

and lets hope hes still with the jays when they are finally forced to keep him in the lineup to sort out his problems, but if he doesn’t figure it out this year I wouldn’t count on it. Maybe as a bench player, but not ever getting a starting role for a full season

by TheMainEvent on Dec 12, 2011 11:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about our heroic azure-tinged corvidae, the Toronto Blue Jays.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hal2_small
Quantifying the Effect of Team Defense on Over/Underperforming the Team's FIP
Small
Brett Lawrie's historic defensive prowess

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blue Jays Player Stats Multiplied by 4
Small
Petition to change Suckage Award Titles
Jaysfanimage_small
The Lansing 4: What to do when they outpitch expectations?
Misc_003_small
Jays' All-Star Alliterative Name Team
Kingkelly_small
Stats tools?
Small
Jays Future Closer?
N41306733_31278203_7401_steve_golfin_small
my MLB power ranking, May Edition
Jaysfanimage_small
Blue Jays Farm Report - Apr 29-May 5

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Bluejayperched_small hugo

Rincewind-1_small Tom Dakers

Assistant Manager

Smith_up_small JohnnyG

Authors

Hiro_small jessef

Profile_small masterkembo

Profiel_small Woodman663

Minorleaguer_small Minor Leaguer

Tony_fernandez_small TonyFernandezSavedMyLife

Moderators

J_bau_small jays182

Aejfuulciaar18g_small Bowling_Guy25