Kyle Drabek: an analysis of the rookie's stuff
Do you remember April the 2nd, this year? Kyle Drabek had a no-hitter going until Denard Span hit a cutter for a line drive single after 5.1 innings of dominance by Drabek. Drabek struck out seven Twins and walked three that day, and the Jays won resoundingly after crushing Francisco Liriano. Optimism was at a maximum: the Jays had won their first two games in convincing fashion against the Twins, projected AL Central winners, who sent well-regarded pitchers like Liriano and Carl Pavano to the mound. Kyle Drabek was looking like an ace, he now had 4 career starts, and he had limited the walks, got a decent number of strikeouts, but most of all he had an impressive groundball ratio. Kyle Drabek, I think we all thought, was going to be an ace pitcher immediately.
It didn't turn out like that. First of all, the Twins turned out to be Oriolifically crappy this year, to the point where even the masters of such crappiness, the Orioles themselves, beat up on them. Pavano and Liriano have been crushed by almost every other team (the White Sox don't count as a team) as well. But apart from that it makes our Jays look less awesome, it doesn't concern us. What does concern us, is the performance of young Kyle Drabek, our future ace. Well, one of three aces anyway, as Brandon Morrow v 2.0 and Ricky Romero seem like legitimate aces as well. Drabek started walking a lot of batters in his next two starts, but was limiting the damage somehow. However, when he then faced the Yankees his peripherals turned ugly (4 BB, 2 K) and he allowed 4 runs in 5.1 innings pitched. He had a good game against the Rangers, he got a lot of groundballs, before getting crushed by the Yankees again with 5 runs allowed in 2.1 innings. Since then, he had an average outing against the Rays, and a positive one against the Red Sox this Tuesday. Although he allowed two home runs, one to Ortiz and one to Adrian Gonzalez, he had more Ks than BB for the first time since facing the Mariners, which was almost a full month earlier.
If you look at Drabek's opponents since that awesome Twins game, you'll find he has faced a tough bunch of teams, to put it mildly. The Yankees (twice) and the Rangers are the top 2 in wOBA of the (American) league, and the Red Sox, Angels and Rays are also pretty good. The Rays probably look worse than they are, because they missed Evan Longoria, who came back right before Drabek faced the Rays. The Mariners aren't any good, but Drabek might not have been at his best that day, as his fastball velocity was down a bit. Looking at Drabek's splits, he has a 4.54 xFIP against lefties, and a 4.45 against righties. He walks and Ks more lefties, but gets more groundballs against righties. He has faced almost twice as many lefties as he has righties.
(more after the jump)
Because the Pitch F/X data from TexasLeaguers for Kyle Drabek wasn't accurate (classifying his changeups as curves for most of the season) so I gather the data myself. You can see the results here: link.
First of, what does Drabek throw? He throws a fastball (2-seam and 4-seam, they are hard to distinguish so I lumped them together) 59.5% of the time, mostly away from lefties, and in to righties. It sits around 94 mph, will touch 96 mph on occasion and can be down to 90-91 mph later in games. He throws a cutter at around 89-92 mph, mostly inside to lefties and outside to righties, and he uses it 21.8% of the time. Then there's a 84-87 mph changeup which he will throw mostly to lefties, and he throws it 9.5% of the time. Last but not least there's his curveball which he throws 9.2% of the time to both lefties and righties, but more to righties. I will compare his pitch type stats with those of Romero, Litsch and Morrow (data from TexasLeaguers). First the fastballs and cut fastballs:
| Pitch | Usage% | Strike% | Swing% | SwStr% | InPlay% |
| Drabek Fastball | 59.5% | 59.9% | 40.7% | 7.8% | 17.2% |
| Drabek Cutter | 21.8% | 48.2% | 35.3% | 6.5% | 16.5% |
| Litsch Fastball | 39.0% | 52.0% | 34.9% | 3.3% | 20.1% |
| Litsch Cutter | 15.7% | 60.2% | 30.0% | 6.5% | 12.0% |
| Romero Fastball | 64.2% | 59.8% | 41.9% | 6.0% | 18.8% |
| Morrow Fastball | 63.5% | 61.7% | 46.3% | 11.7% | 12.5% |
Drabek's fastball seems to get strikes at a normal rate, and whiffs at an above average rate. It isn't at Morrow's level, but it seems to be good enough. The cutter, which he throws a lot of, has not been a good pitch. It started off well against Minnesota and LA, but since then Drabek's command over it seems to have completely disappeared. Pitchers who throw cutters a lot tend to get more than 60% strikes with it, but Drabek has been getting himself into a lot of hitters counts by throwing this pitch wide of the strikezone. Drabek did throw it for 63.6% strikes in his first two outings, so you can imagine how low his strike% since then is. The amount of times he's thrown the pitch has also decreased.
Well, on to the changeups:
| Pitch |
Usage% |
Strike% |
Swing% |
SwStr% |
InPlay% |
| Drabek |
9.5% |
56.8% |
48.6% |
23.0% |
13.5% |
| Litsch | 12.2% |
69.0% |
61.9% |
19.0% |
23.9% |
| Romero |
24,8% |
69.9% |
59.0% |
26.5% |
16.3% |
| Morrow* |
5.8% |
72.7% |
45.5% |
4.5% |
13.6% |
| Marcum |
32.6% |
65.8% |
56.0% |
21.0% |
21.4% |
| Cecil 2010 |
24.2% |
60.1% |
50.3% |
16.4% |
18.1% |
*Morrow uses a splitter as a sort of changeup
It should be noted here that Romero and Marcum are masters of the change. And still, Drabek does not compare all that unfavourably to those guys. He gets a lot of whiffs but a below average number of strikes, and if he threw it more batters would probably get better at recognizing the pitch. That said, over his last four outings Drabek has thrown the pitch for a strike 61.9% of the time, with a 32.6% swinging strike rate. Drabek seems to trust the pitch a bit more as he threw more changeups against the Red Sox than cutters. And to great effect, as the Sox hitters whiffed at 7 of his 18 changeups (38.9%). Drabek's changeup seems to be getting better all the time and has lately been producing at a phenomenal level for him. On to the breaking balls:
| Pitch |
Usage% |
Strike% |
Swing% |
SwStr% |
InPlay% |
| Drabek CU |
9.2% |
62.5% |
41.7% |
18.1% |
15.3% |
| Litsch SL |
25.4% |
69.7% |
49.1% |
16.0% |
16.6% |
| Litsch CU |
7.7% |
54.7% |
43.4% |
13.2% |
17.0% |
| Morrow SL |
25.7% |
60.8% |
50.5% |
19.6% |
14.4% |
| Romero CU |
10.4% |
48.6% |
31.4% |
14.3% |
8.6% |
| Cecil SL* |
19.0% |
64.3% |
49.2% |
11.7% |
17.8% |
Cecil's data used here is from 2010
Drabek gets a good number of strikes with his curveball, a lot of them looking. When batters do swing, they will not make contact very often. However, like his cutter, Drabek's curve has also gotten worse results after having a phenomenal first two games. Over his last four games, Drabek has thrown it for a strike 52.8% and gotten just 11.1% swinging strikes.
To summarize, Drabek has the stuff you want from an ace pitcher. His fastball, changeup and curveball all rate as above average over the course of the season. It has really been mostly the command of his cutter over the last six games that has made him a much less effective pitcher than he could have been. Perhaps Drabek could drop it for a few games, increase the use of his promising offspeed stuff, and see how that goes. Drabek has the stuff to be an ace, I'm certain of it. But then, you all knew he does because you've watched him. What perhaps you didn't know was how good his changeup has been, most notably in his last few starts. I can't wait to see him become what we all know he can become. The third ace of this young staff.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m not sure any of the three pitchers you mention are truly aces. They all seem like reliable 2nd-3rd starters, but not true staff aces.
by scrambles the death dealer on May 13, 2011 3:50 PM EDT reply actions
That’s a good question. Certainly the quality of their “stuff” needs to be exceptional, and in Morrow’s case it is. In general though, an ace needs to have a good blend of power, control, movement, consistency and most importantly, results. When I think of staff aces I think of pitchers like Halladay, Johnson, Hernandez, Lester, Lee, Weaver, Kershaw, Lincecum, Jo-Jo Reyes (haha just kidding) and other similar pitchers.
Morrow, Romero and Drabek are all very good pitchers but I’m not sure they can be labeled as aces, or truly elite talent.
by scrambles the death dealer on May 13, 2011 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Romero’s changeup to me qualifies as exceptional. Perhaps your view of an “ace” is narrower than mine. I think when you have an xFIP of below 3.40 you qualify as an ace. They are currently at that level of performance and I see no reason why they couldn’t maintain that level of excellence.
People define the word ace by completely different and arbitrary means for the most part.
It seems like pitchers who throw consecutive 200+ inning, 3.50 and below era/fip/xfip seasons are all universally annointed as such however, and that’s generally the (admittedly arbitrary like everyone elses) criteria I personally use, which Romero and Morrow are both definitely capable of placing themselves under in the near future. But neither of them have the track record required for the average fan of any given team to look at, and apply the word ‘ace’ to.
Ultimately it’s kind of a silly thing to try and define, and I think anyone could acknowledge both as currently being legitimate frontline starters, which is probably what we mostly assume Drabek is capable of becoming, and probably what you were getting at.
Like I said, it is a blend of a number of different characteristics which defines an ace. All three Blue Jays you mentioned have very good pitches but have struggled elsewhere. Morrow and Drabek struggle to find the zone sometimes and Romero is giving up way too many home runs. Once they can bring it all together and consistently perform well they can be classified as aces.
by scrambles the death dealer on May 13, 2011 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Romero and Drabek both have better stuff than Lee and Weaver
so if those two are aces (which they are), Drabek and Romero have the potential to be as well.
Cliff Lee has an unreal K/BB ratio, and Weaver consistently fools opponents. Furthermore, I did not say that Romero and Drabek did not have the potential to be aces, which I do not believe. I believe that currently, they cannot be classified as aces.
by scrambles the death dealer on May 13, 2011 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s some good stuff right there.
I find it weird Drabek uses his curveball the least when it’s his best pitch and has the strike % of all of his pitches.
I know it could be just Drabek using his change-up, cutter and fastball to improve those pitches since his curveball is already a good pitch but I think he’ll be much more successful if he starts using his curveball more often.
Just a thought but maybe he gets the best results from his curveball because hitters don’t see it very often?
by scrambles the death dealer on May 13, 2011 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s possible. But I think that when Drabek can get ahead in the count more, he can also get more whiffs on curves out of the zone because batters are now often just taking the pitch because of Drabek’s inability to find the strikezone (mostly with the cutter).
I’m sure all his pitches will be more effective if he can get early strikes, but for some reason he seems to be struggling to hit the zone.
by scrambles the death dealer on May 13, 2011 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
no day job...
anyone?
but on a more serious note, good job and a nice read.

by 






















