Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Possible trade target at deadline

During this offseason we've seen AA sign plenty of quality relievers on short term deals. I can't help but compare this to last year when we did the same, then flipped some of them to acquire Rasmus. If we do another deadline trade, where would you want the upgrade to be?


Star-divide

So I was just thinking about how AA has used the last 2 deadlines to acquire major upgrades at positions of weakness in Yunel Escobar and Colby Rasmus. Escobar had a great first full season with the Blue Jays and we're all hoping the same will happen with Rasmus. Assuming AA again makes a similar trade at the deadline, what position would you want to be upgraded? (I know some of the positions fairly are secure at the moment, but just want to see what everyone thinks)

Poll
If AA again trades for a player at the deadline, what position would you want him to be?
1B
69 votes
2B
25 votes
SS
1 votes
3B
0 votes
C
0 votes
OF
1 votes
DH
4 votes
SP
98 votes

198 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 64 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agreed

I want a package containing some mix of prospects, lottery picks and IFA Cap money.

by T_Mizz on Feb 15, 2012 2:58 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

though the question didn’t ask who he should target…so lets assume he acquires the best package available, what position do you hope is addressed?

by ayjackson on Feb 16, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe another outfielder

Thats the only position that may need a serious upgrade if Snider and Thames fail. Lind is at worst an acceptable 1B but could be upgraded.

Man who has four balls cannot walk

by Beer Leaguer on Feb 15, 2012 2:28 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

Lind is at worst best an acceptable 1B but could be upgraded.

by Mathlete on Feb 15, 2012 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha, the Force is strong with this one

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Feb 15, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec’d for Star Wars reference.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Feb 16, 2012 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

My definition of acceptable:

If he is the worst position starter on our team, we are doing something right.

Man who has four balls cannot walk

by Beer Leaguer on Feb 15, 2012 3:48 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

if he's replacement level?

then we’re doing at least one thing wrong

by benk on Feb 15, 2012 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

True

At least we don’t have Daric Barton at 1B though.

Man who has four balls cannot walk

by Beer Leaguer on Feb 15, 2012 5:09 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

eh?

His 2011 wRC+ is 26

by Pikachu on Feb 15, 2012 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

He's clearly anti-BB :)
Man who has four balls cannot walk

by MjwW on Feb 15, 2012 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

ha!

great sig

I am the Walrus

by yleviticus on Feb 15, 2012 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Hahaha. Unintentional Pikachu bait. Awesome.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Feb 16, 2012 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think there was anything unintentional about it.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Feb 16, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

And if he's the worst position starter on our team

he’s probably the one we should upgrade, as per the poll.

by Mathlete on Feb 15, 2012 10:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Last year he wasn't though

But this year there is no way the outfield will be as bad.

Man who has four balls cannot walk

by Beer Leaguer on Feb 16, 2012 12:35 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

I think Lind is going to have a big year, personally. His core mechanics are solid and he’s got another year of conditioning under his belt. If he can avoid injury and keep his swing consistant, I think his 2009 numbers are very replicable.

by dexfarkin on Feb 15, 2012 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

we thought that last year

and 2010. Do you have reason to believe that 2012 is more likely to be 2009 than the last 2 seasons? I hope you do, but Im skeptical.

by SuckaMD on Feb 15, 2012 11:59 PM EST up reply actions  

He was epic bad in 2010. But last year, he was hot for a solid stretch before going down. I think there’s been a combination of injuries, positional changes and his own bad habits involved in the last two years. Can I make any kind of statistical argument? Not in the slightest. But, I look at the core mechanics of his swing and his plate approach, and I still see a very good bat there.

by dexfarkin on Feb 16, 2012 3:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Hope you are right. At the very least he should be able to play the solid side of a platoon, if healthy.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Feb 16, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope I’m right too. The Jays need solid offense out of 1B, and this is likely Lind’s last real shot at being a full time player.

by dexfarkin on Feb 16, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd like Morales

should not be tooooo expensive with him being out so long with that leg injury and the comeback uncertainty + excess of 1B/DH in the angels roster.

I am looking forward to watching both Trumbo and Cabrera play 3rd this year hahaha (or how long they stay there)

by llello.loves.ace on Feb 15, 2012 2:46 PM EST reply actions  

Funny, the last time Morales had a good season was the last time Lind did

Actually, Lind was just a tick better than Morales in ‘09 at the plate. I’d say the odds of both being that productive again probably favour Lind due to Morales’ injury history.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Feb 15, 2012 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Fixed
I’d say the odds of both being that productive again probably favour Lind due to Morales’ injury historyif the Jays have the good sense to platoon him.

by MjwW on Feb 15, 2012 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Injury history?

That’s not fair. Neither is calling ‘09 Morales’ last good season. Morales broke a bone or 3 in a walkoff homerun celebration. He was having a really solid offensive season, best on LAA, hitting clean-up. It’s not fair to call him injury prone. As long as that freak injury has healed up, he should be good to go and keep building on the solid bat skills he was displaying before he went down.

by khaleeji on Feb 16, 2012 6:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd say it's fair if a guy can't play at all in the last two seasons to hold his injury history against him

I don’t get the love for Morales over Lind. Morales is injury prone and Lind is streaky but in their best season Lind was a bit better (better K and BB rates). Morales is only an upgrade if Lind never again reaches his ‘09 form, Morales can stay healthy and Morales hits like he did in ’09. I don’t think that’s likely.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Feb 16, 2012 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure

But it seems like to me in order to be “injury prone” you’d have to face a few injuries. You could say the reason he was sidelined last season was because of a “second” injury, but really it was just complications from the first one. And that being pretty much a freak injury

If I had to choose between Morales and Lind, I’d choose Morales, but that’s just me. He put up a higher fWAR in 50 games before being injured than Lind did all of last season

by Aidin on Feb 16, 2012 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

The position really does not matter as much..

as the years under control do. Of course, a good 2b would be good, but since we are not going to contend this year (hopefully next year) we should trade for another player that is having relationship issues with the team.

In AA we trust.

by bluejays13 on Feb 15, 2012 3:35 PM EST reply actions  

Just waiting for Guillen to have a twitter war with Morrison

And AA will be there to give Miami a couple of RP for him.

by Psychotoad on Feb 15, 2012 4:34 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Love it

In AA we trust.

by bluejays13 on Feb 15, 2012 7:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I'll take whatever can be found

There are only ever one or two premium talents available at the deadline. It’s hard to see a young, elite 2B being available, for instance, however much that would fit the Jays’ lineup.

by gabrielsyme on Feb 15, 2012 4:38 PM EST reply actions  

basically the point of this post was if you had to pick one position to upgrade, which would it be

I know we’ll take whatever upgrade we can get and years of control matter but I figured I’d try to keep things fairly simple

by STZ513 on Feb 15, 2012 5:46 PM EST reply actions  

2B

Need somebody to replace KJ. He will be fa, and probably will get good drAft pick for him.

by Ssamze on Feb 15, 2012 7:25 PM EST reply actions  

you think someone will sign him for 12M a year?

He’ll have to have a great season

His 2011 wRC+ is 26

by Pikachu on Feb 15, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought

it’s just that the Jays have to offer him a 1 year deal for ~12M. If he declines, it doesn’t matter what the AAV of his next contract is, the Jays get the pick either way.

by Gerse on Feb 15, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

This is correct

In practice though, if a player cannot get 12M on the open market, he is very likely to accept the offer.

by Playoffs!!!!1 on Feb 15, 2012 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep, exactly

It’s a game theory exercise – you want the pick, but unless you want the player, you don’t want to offer unless you’re sure he’ll decline. And the only reason he’ll decline is if he can do better on the open market, in which case you wouldn’t him accepting.

by MjwW on Feb 15, 2012 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sure we can think of a number of scenarios where a player may in fact decline the 12/1 in search of a lower AAV but over more years. For example, a player in the twilight of his career may decline 12/1 and instead seek out something like 27/3, no?

by Gerse on Feb 16, 2012 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure

But here’s the thing – if a player could get 27/3 on the open market, then he’s probably worth 12/1 anyway (figuring in aging curve and less risk on a 1 year deal), so you would offer anyway

by MjwW on Feb 16, 2012 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Now I'm confused

Do we want KJ to accept arb? For me I rather have draft picks. I know JK is good but not 12M good. If he will likely to accept arb, then I would like AA trade him for a possible good prospect or a good player. Hmm.. let me think who would we possibly trade for KJ.

by Ssamze on Feb 16, 2012 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

It's not arb anymore

It’s a qualifying offer. I think it really depends on how he does – if he has a bad year, no one’s going to give him, and we wouldn’t want to omake that qualifying offer in all probability because he’s accept and we’d be paying him $12M.

If he has a good year, say 3-4 WAR, I think he’d have a chance at something like 3/30M, but there’s still the draft pick thing, and teams might be really hesitant to give up a top 40 pick for KJ. But even then we’d have a 3/4 WAR 2B for 12M, which isn’t bad (and could always trade the contract too)

Ultimately, we want him to have a really good year. That’s how we’ll invariably maximize the asset value

by MjwW on Feb 16, 2012 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think so

I’m fairly sure that was only for this offseason, as a transitional measure from the old to new CBA. My understanding is under the new CBA, every free agent who receives a qualifying offer and declines it is the equivalent of a Type A under the old CBA (with no equivalent for Type B)

by MjwW on Feb 16, 2012 7:34 AM EST up reply actions  

just looked it up

good news is now only teams in the top 10 have protected picks. Bad news, this makes it less likely KJ will be picked up by a team after being offered arbitration. Unless he absolutely bombs or gets ridiculously good I’m thinking he’ll be traded at the deadline, unless we are contending

by STZ513 on Feb 16, 2012 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Its only the players who get offered a contract in the top 125 of players (this year would’ve been 12.5 mil) therefor KJ won’t be getting that offer unless he goes bananas

Kadri Fanboy since 2006

by WizardofNaz on Feb 21, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

OIC

that is cool

His 2011 wRC+ is 26

by Pikachu on Feb 15, 2012 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

not Lawrie

That would not be AA’s style. He would wait Votto will start his manger/teammate/organization and pick him up with EE or Lind. I wish..

by Ssamze on Feb 16, 2012 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

ABout going back to Atlanta for a trade

Trade Snider, Lind and Hech for Hayward and a SP, move Bautista to First and Hayward plays RF.

by jensan on Feb 16, 2012 3:59 PM EST reply actions  

Heyward would be a terrific buy low.

But they’d have no interest in Lind (because of Freeman), and it would take a lot more, I suspect.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.

by Jevant on Feb 16, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

They could play Lind in LF

but you’re right, I don’t think the Braves go for that.

Hic sunt fortuna dracones
There is only 1 "n" in Hutchison

by JaysfanDL on Feb 16, 2012 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Be reasonable at least

I want Matt Moore included in that package before I’d start to consider it

by MjwW on Feb 16, 2012 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

in any case

Heyward’d certainly be worth looking into, meaning AA already has

by benk on Feb 16, 2012 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about our heroic azure-tinged corvidae, the Toronto Blue Jays.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Grain-of-salt_small
On random variation: LOB%, BABIP and FIP vs. ERA
Graffiti-cbgb-bathroom_small
You know what Grinds my Gears?
Hal2_small
Quantifying the Effect of Team Defense on Over/Underperforming the Team's FIP
Small
Brett Lawrie's historic defensive prowess

Recent FanPosts

Img_0569_2_small
Tell me where to go...
Small
Blue Jays Player Stats Multiplied by 4
Small
Petition to change Suckage Award Titles
Jaysfanimage_small
The Lansing 4: What to do when they outpitch expectations?
Misc_003_small
Jays' All-Star Alliterative Name Team
Kingkelly_small
Stats tools?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Bluejayperched_small hugo

Rincewind-1_small Tom Dakers

Assistant Manager

Smith_up_small JohnnyG

Authors

Hiro_small jessef

Profile_small masterkembo

Profiel_small Woodman663

Minorleaguer_small Minor Leaguer

Tony_fernandez_small TonyFernandezSavedMyLife

Moderators

Ryder_small jays182

Aejfuulciaar18g_small Bowling_Guy25