FanPost

Blue Jays Organization Depth / Rule 5 / Options Info

Juan Perez - USA TODAY Sports

With the calendar having turned to November, the hot stove season is in full gear. For most, this means visions of free agents to fill holes and blockbuster trades. But it also means that the Rule 5 draft is a month away, and the deadline for protecting players from the Rule 5 draft is looming (November 20). It's also a good time to take stock of the organizational depth chart to think about prospects coming through the system, and what type of flexibility might be needed in the future. To that end, the last couple years I've put together a post looking at the organization depth chart and Rule 5 eligibility. e&n4e has put together a series of posts the last month examining this, which somewhat of not largely obviates the need for me to do so, but there's been good feedback the past couple years I think there's still some use in putting it together as a resource.

As I did last year, I've tried to add more useful information. In addition to details about the player and how they were acquired (directly relevant to Rule 5) and the signing bonus they received to provide context about how they were valued, this year I've added the level(s) at which each player has played in the Jays' system from 2011 to 2013 per a request last year. This was largely done using data quickly and easily pulled from Baseball-Reference, and so it only covers time spent with the Jays' affiliates. For players with three or more levels, I've only included the most significant two. In addition, I've included an update of the framework on options and outrights for Blue Jay players that I previously had posted. I think it makes sense to include it here, though I'll probably post another update around Spring Training once minor league free agent signing are complete.

Onto the Rule 5

As a brief primer, the Rule 5 draft was designed to prevent teams from stockpiling talent in their minor league systems without giving them a shot at the majors. For $50,000, a team can claim an eligible player not on his team's 40-man (MLB) roster, but they have to keep him on their 25-man (active roster) for the entire next season or offer him back to his original team. In general, players under 19 are Rule 5 eligible four years after signing, and players over 19 are eligible 3 years after signing. So, with some exceptions, high school players and international free agents (IFAs) drafted in 2009 or before are eligible this year, as are college players drafted in 2010 or earlier. I did a much more detailed summary last year, it is linked below.

2012 Rule 5 Eligibles (detailed explanation of Rule 5)

2011 Rule 5 Eligibles

Below are the charts breaking up players by the year of their first Rule 5 eligibility. Below that is some commentary and how I see things happening, as well as some changes from last year (including one affecting IFAs), and some scattered facts. For 2013, players highlighted in yellow are those I believe merit protect and in blue may attract some interest from other teams if left unprotected. For future years, yellow highlighting indicates I believe the player is a consideration to be added to the 40-man.

2013 FIRST TIME ELIGIBLE PLAYERS

2013_fte_large

2013 PREVIOUSLY ELIGIBLE PLAYERS

2013_pe_large

2014 FIRST TIME ELIGIBLE PLAYERS

2014_fte_large

2015 FIRST TIME ELIGIBLE PLAYERS

2015_fte_large

2016 FIRST TIME ELIGIBLE PLAYERS

2016a_fte_large

2016b_fte_large

2017 FIRST TIME ELIGIBLE PLAYERS

2017_fte_large

*The only signing date for Barretto is the 6/2013 date listed by the Jays on their transaction page. However, he was part of the 2012 July 2 signing class and if his signing is consistent with others in that class, he will be Rule 5 eligible in 2016 (see below)

Thoughts on 2013 Rule 5 Protection and Beyond

The Jays currently have 38 players on the 40 man, which leaves little flexibility to protect additional players without removing others. As it turns out, that's not really an issue since there's not really many players meriting protection this year. In terms of first time eligibles, I'd expect only Deck McGuire to be protected. Kenny Wilson has been the subject of some speculation, but I don't see it. In the recent past, Danny Barnes and Santiago Nessy would have been considered candidates, but beyond their merits would be likely difficult to keep on a MLB roster and are therefore unlikely to be chosen anyway.

In terms of previously eligible players, there's not really anyone to protect either. Ricky Romero is eligible to be taken (and technically this is his first time subject to Rule 5 since he would was protected in 2008), but at this point he's already been through waivers twice so he's almost certainly not going anywhere. Any minor league free agent is technically available, so the likes of Juan Perez and Mike Nickeas are eligible to be poached. Perez I suppose could be taken if a team had a bunch of spots and really liked him, but if there was that kind of interest why re-sign with the Jays on a minor league deal.

Looking forward to 2014, the prime candidates for protection are Andy Burns, Aaron Sanchez and John Stilson, though I'd expect at least one of Burns and Stilson to force their way on the 40-man before next November. Other possibilities who could make a push in my view include Dalton Pompey, Shane Opitz and Jon Berti though the latter two in particular are longshots. 2015 is really far off, but there's a multitude of names that will be 40-man factors if not already on, headlined by Stroman, Norris, Osuna.

Notes on the Lists and Changes from Last Year

  • As before, I have attempted to include all players in the organization. Previously, I included all players who had signed, and removed those who had been released, traded, waived, etc. This left a handful of players who had not played in several years and did not appear to be actively in the organization, but without a formal transaction to this effect. This year, I removed all players who had not played in the last two seasons without a transaction indicting they remain active (Carlos Pina has been injured since 2010, but with transactions).
  • Most of these players were "org guys", signed to round out summer league teams and low draft picks. The two of significance were Aderlin Gonzalez, who received a $260K bonus in 2010 but has not played since 2010; and Kendry Melo who BA reported as having signed for over $100K, and has a MLB page but has never played. For the latter in particular, it's possible he's still in the org.
  • In addition, there are several similar type players who did not play in 2013 who ostensibly remain in the organization. I included them in the lists, but italicized. In most cases, I think it's probably they've moved on from baseball.
  • The other major change is the Rule 5 eligibility for certain IFAs, including significant ones such as Roberto Osuna and Franklin Barreto, has been moved up a year from where it was last year. The timing of the signing date can effect when they become Rule 5 eligible, as generally if a player signs after the end of August they're deemed to have signed after the next Winter Meetings and gain an extra year of avoiding the Rule 5 draft. Rather than being eligible on the 5th Rule 5 draft after signing, it's effectively the 6th Rule 5 draft. For the signing date, I had been using the date reported in the Jays' transactions page and many were reported in this time period (I thought the Jays had found a loophole). I've noticed that in certain cases, their MiLB player profiles indicate earlier signing dates. I'm not sure exactly why they're different (maybe has to do with when they sign and when MLB approves the contract), but I've switched to using the earlier date to be conservative
  • For example, Osuna was signed in 2011. Generally, a player under 19 signed in 2011 would be Rule 5 eligible in 2015 (5th Rule draft after signing). The signing is listed in the Jays transactions on 8/30/2011, which qualify for the signing to be deemed to have occurred after the 2011 meetings, so the 5th Rule 5 draft after signing would not be until 2016. However, Osuna's profile lists Aug 3, 2011 as the signing date, which would not qualify for exemption and he would be eligible in the 2015 Rule 5 draft.

Miscellaneous Points of Possible Interest

  • The Jays had 6 players become 7-year free agents this month, meaning their minor league contracts had been renewed the maximum six times after their initial season: 2007 draftees Kevin Ahrens, John Tolisano, Jon Talley, Alan Farina and Marcus Walden; as well as 2007 IFA Daniel Arcila.
  • This compares with only one drafted player in each of the last 2 years: Rey Gonzalez (2011) and Jonathan Diaz (2012). I believe that Oliver Dominguez was also FA-eligible last year and re-signed, in any event he was granted free agency this year. I imagine this trend is due to the addition of affiliates, which meant more players were needed and so fewer were released.
  • Other notable players granted minor league FA earlier this month include First Half Superstar(tm) Jim Negrych, Adam Loewen, Luis Jimenez, Ricardo Nanita, Chad Beck, Tyson Brummett and Joel Carreno (whom I wish had got more of a chance with the Jays)
  • With the above 2007 draftees hitting free agency, there are only four 2007 Blue Jay draftees left in the organization: J.P. Arencibia and Brett Cecil on the 40 man, in addition to Justin Jackson (who would have been a FA had he not re-signed) and Randy Boone (who signed after the 2007 season, making 2008 his first year and 2013 his 5th renewal)
  • This compares to no 2006 Blue Jay draftees left in the organization (though they other 2006 draftees such as Drabek, Lincoln and Jeffress), one 2005 draftee (Romero), two 2004 draftees (Lind and Janssen), none from 2001-2003 and Dustin McGowan from 2000.
  • The only IFAs signed before 2008 who remain in the organization are Luis Perez (2003) and Moises Sierra (2005).

OPTIONS / OUTRIGHT - 40 Man Roster Players

40_man_options_large

5+ Years (14): Bautista, Buehrle, Cabrera, DeRosa, Dickey, Encarnacion, Happ, Izturis, Janssen, Lind, McGowan, Morrow, Rasmus, Reyes

Out of Options (8): Cecil, Jeffress, Lincoln, Perez, Redmond, Rogers, Santos, Sierra

There are 22 players currently on the 40-man roster who would be locked into the 25-man come Opening Day, before any additions through free agency. Beyond the possibility of needing 40-man spots this winter, it seems unlikely the Jays can carry all these players next season. I would look for the Jays to try and sneak the likes of Luis Perez, Lincoln, and one of Redmond/Rogers through waivers (or trade them).

OPTIONS - Non 40-Man Players

Other_options_large

This only includes players with previous time on a 40-Man roster, as any player who has not spent time on the 40-Man roster will have a full complement of options

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bluebird Banter

You must be a member of Bluebird Banter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bluebird Banter. You should read them.

Join Bluebird Banter

You must be a member of Bluebird Banter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bluebird Banter. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker