FanPost

The Inevitable regression of Colby Rasmus

Peter Llewellyn-USA TODAY Sports

Note: I originally wrote this piece on my blog, but figured I'd post it over here as well to get a wider audience. Thanks for reading!

This has been a roller coaster ride of a baseball season. We're 133 games in, and, despite reaching a high of 14 games over .500 in June, and starting this month ten games over and in a playoff spot, it's now the end of August, the Jays have, for lack of a better term, completely shit the bed on their most promising season in decades. It's at that point where I don't know how far back they are in the standings for my own personal sanity.

In a season full of peaks and valleys, one storyline has kinda been mind boggling, intriguing and frustrating all at the same time: Watching Colby Rasmus and his puzzling, yet seemingly inevitable regression.

Last year, Rasmus slashed .276/.338/.501, posting a 129 wRC+, .365 wOBA, and a solid 11.2 UZR, all coming together for a career high 4.8 fWAR, in only 118 games played. He was a silver lining to probably the most disappointing season since 1987, considering the expectations. However, in the offseason, Blake Murphy of Fangraphs wrote a piece on whether Colby Rasmus could survive a trip from the regression monster. It turns out, he hasn't been able to.

IN 2014, his slash has dropped to .223/.285/.437, his wRC+ is at 98, and his defense has dropped off a cliff as he's posted a -6.8 UZR, all coming together for a dismal 0.4 fWAR, down over 4 wins from a career year in 2013.

You see, one of the most interesting and unpredictable aspects in baseball is dumb luck. If you've ever read Moneyball, you'd know that in the average baseball game, about one run is attributed to skill, while four others are attributed to luck. Over 162 games, this evens out for every team, and the skill shines through. Often, however, for one player, their luck evens out over the course of multiple seasons. Is that what we're seeing from Colby Rasmus?

Well, maybe not. This might be an average season from Colby Rasmus. Last season, he had a BABIP (batting average on balls in play) of .356 (league average was .297), which was thirteenth highest among hitters with a minimum 450 plate appearances. In his vicinity, were the likes of Marlon Byrd, Miguel Cabrera, Jayson Werth, Matt Carpenter and Joey Votto. Despite Rasmus' insane batted ball luck, most guys who had the same luxury put up better overall offensive seasons.

2013 BABIP Leaders (Minimum: 450 PAs)

Rank Player PA BABIP wRAA K% oRAR
5 Jarrod Saltalamacchia 470 .372 12.9 29.5 10.1
6 Freddie Freeman 629 .371 36.2 19.2 33.6
7 Allen Craig 563 .368 21.9 17.8 15.6
8 Mike Napoli 578 .367 24.1 32.4 17.7
9 Starling Marte 566 .363 13.4 24.4 20.8
10 Joey Votto 726 .360 49.1 19.0 45.5
11 Matt Carpenter 717 .359 37.8 13.7 41.4
12 Jayson Werth 532 .358 37.0 19.0 35.8
13 Colby Rasmus 458 .356 18.4 29.5 16.1
14 Miguel Cabrera 652 .356 72.1 14.4 63.4
15 Marlon Byrd 579 .353 22.7 24.9 24.3
16 Andrew McCutchen 674 .353 41.7 15.0 47.0
17 Daniel Nava 536 .352 21.7 17.4 17.7
18 Brandon Belt 571 .351 22.8 21.9 25.6

Source: Fangraphs
oRAR=Offensive Runs Above Replacement, the offensive discriminant used in fWAR

In that entire list of 13 guys, the only two guys with a worse oRAR than Rasmus are Jarrod Saltalamacchia and Allen Craig, and Mike Napoli is barely ahead. If you look at Napoli and Saltalamacchia next to Rasmus, they all have a major similarity: They strike out alot. The thing is with guys who strike out approximately 25%-33% of the time is, they need to have an inflated BABIP to have any sort of sustained success over multiple seasons. It's also worth noting that Rasmus was probably due for a regression last year as well, but two separate stints to the disabled list in the last two months put a halt to his season.

So let's look at Colby Rasmus over the past two years, and see the difference.

Metric Rasmus '13 MLB '13 Rasmus '14 MLB '14
BABIP .356 .297 .286 .299
K% 29.5% 19.9% 31.5% 20.3%
LD% 22.0% 21.2% 23.1% 20.7%
LD Avg .823 .690 .633 .693


While the BABIP is down this year, it's not sorely below league average. His line-drive% is still above average, and we've seen him line into the shift a few times. The big thing is his average on line drives. Last year, almost every line drive he hit fell in. This year, he's seen that regress almost 200 points. So, he's been a little bit unlucky, but not so much so that it's significantly affecting his production. In order for Colby Rasmus to produce more often, he needs to put the bat on the ball with some consistency. If you only put a ball in play two-thirds of the time, you need the kind of luck he had in 2013 to produce, and that hasn't happened this year, and the issue is compounded by the extreme shift used against him, which have zapped quite a few hits.

Now, let's take a quick glance at his defense, the other factor on him being worth four less wins above replacement. Last year, his UZR (the defensive metric in fWAR, measured in runs above/below average) was 11.2 runs above replacement. This year, it's down at -6.8 runs below replacement, which is a swing of 18 runs (almost two wins). If we use the extrapolated UZR/150 to compare the two years, the difference jumps to 28.4 runs, which is almost three wins. The defense of Colby Rasmus continues to be a mystery; he's had two outstanding years (2009, 2013), three awful years (2010, 2011, 2014), and in 2012 he had a 0.4 UZR in over 1200 innings, which is average.

After a pair of Jekyll and Hyde seasons, where is Colby Rasmus' production headed in 2015? It's hard to say. This year has been a little unlucky, but it will be difficult to match the BABIP and line drive average that he had in 2013 in his career, considering the rate at which he strikes out.

But one thing is likely: with Anthony Gose having two of his three option years used up, Dalton Pompey's slingshot through the system, along with Jose Bautista and, God willing, Melky Cabrera part of the future, whatever Colby does in 2015 probably won't be north of the border.


Note: All metrics are from FanGraphs, and are accurate as of August 26th.

Editor's Note: This is a FanPost written by a reader and member of Bluebird Banter. It was not commissioned by the editors and is not necessarily reflective of the opinions of Bluebird Banter or SB Nation.