clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Hall of Fame Polls: Mark Buehrle

New, 13 comments
Division Series - Texas Rangers v Toronto Blue Jays - Game Five Photo by Tom Szczerbowski/Getty Images

This year is Mark Buehrle’s second time on the ballot. The first time he appeared on 11% of the ballots. If he can stay on the ballot for a couple more years, his numbers should start growing.

Buehrle is one of the most challenging choices on the list.

Mark was never the best pitcher in the game. He received Cy Young votes just once, finishing 6th in 2005, though he likely deserved votes in other seasons. Mark only made 5 All-Star teams. He never won 20 games (got 19 once), but in all but his rookie year, he had between 10 and 19 wins.

On the other side, he was incredibly consistent. He started more than 30 games in 15 of his 16 MLB seasons. He had the streak of 14 seasons with 200 innings pitch (and came up just 1.1 innings short of making it 15 seasons). We won’t see that again for, at least, a very, very long time (even before 2020 was a shortened season, it was unlikely to happen).

His career 214-160 record puts him number 91 on the all-time list in wins. He’s 65th in bWAR for pitchers. He didn’t walk many, just 2.0 per 9 innings career.

Mark only had one losing season. He was 12-13 in 2006. I know it doesn’t mean all that much, but to be consistently on the winning side, even on some not-so-great teams, is a positive.

When he came to the Blue Jays, Cee Angi told us, in a guest post, that we would love Mark Buehrle, and she was right. It took a bit. He has a plodding start with the Jays but turned it around after a particularly crappy start against the Rays. He gave up 7 runs in the third inning (including two home runs). Amazingly, John Gibbons left him in the game. He finished out 6 innings, giving up 9 hits and the 7 earned. That turned out to be a turning point. He lowered his season ERA every start for his next 21.

I wrote that he taught me about pitching:

I’ve always thought that pitchers need to be assured that they are throwing the right pitch before starting their wind up. Buehrle would rather throw the wrong pitch and keep himself in his rhythm. Keeping in rhythm is essential to Mark.

He also just throws and uses his defense. That’s not a fair way of saying it, but he tries for contact, preferably soft contact, and he figures that the ball will often find a glove.

Continuing:

When he’s going well, he is a joy to watch. Innings go by quickly. He doesn’t walk anyone (less than 2 per 9 innings as a Jay). He pitches to the strike zone’s edges but rarely off the edge. He gets by with movement, changing speeds, mostly from slow to slower. He gives us the feeling that we could be pitchers if we learned to hit our spots.

He’s kind of Batman, not Superman. We think we could work hard enough to be him. We all know we can’t throw 100 mph, but we all believe we could hit the high 70’s (with work), and if we had learned to hit those spots, we could be him. We know we can’t throw as hard as Marcus Stroman, but we think (wrongly) that we could have been Buehrle if we worked enough.

With the Jays, he took the role of the elder statesman. He was great with Marcus Stroman in particular.

One more bit I wrote:

I also like that he didn’t wear goggles for the Jays celebration, preferring to let the champagne sting his eyes. For some reason, that seems far more zen to me. Why spray it around if you don’t want to feel it when it hits you.

I think it will be more challenging for the Writers to make their Hall of Fame votes, on pitchers, in the future. The line always seemed to be 300 wins, something that we will not see in the future. Two hundred wins will be a tough line to cross.

I think Mark is a player who will need time for the writers to talk about and think about before fairly judging him.

Poll

Would you vote Mark Buehrle into the Baseball Hall of Fame?

This poll is closed

  • 53%
    Yes
    (213 votes)
  • 46%
    No
    (188 votes)
401 votes total Vote Now